Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Legal

Court Gives Guidance on Colleges’ Responsibility to Prevent Suicide

By Nell Gluckman May 7, 2018
A panel of state judges ruled that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology wasn’t liable for the suicide of a student, but that doesn’t mean universities are off the hook, law professors say.
A panel of state judges ruled that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology wasn’t liable for the suicide of a student, but that doesn’t mean universities are off the hook, law professors say.AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

Massachusetts’ highest court gave colleges and universities some guidance on Monday about their responsibilities on a complex and delicate issue: suicide prevention.

The Supreme Judicial Court agreed with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that it was not responsible for the death of a 25-year-old graduate student who killed himself by jumping off a campus building in 2009. The student’s father had sued the university, an administrator, and two faculty members, asserting they should have known that his son, Han Nguyen, was at risk.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

A panel of state judges ruled that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology wasn’t liable for the suicide of a student, but that doesn’t mean universities are off the hook, law professors say.
A panel of state judges ruled that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology wasn’t liable for the suicide of a student, but that doesn’t mean universities are off the hook, law professors say.AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

Massachusetts’ highest court gave colleges and universities some guidance on Monday about their responsibilities on a complex and delicate issue: suicide prevention.

The Supreme Judicial Court agreed with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that it was not responsible for the death of a 25-year-old graduate student who killed himself by jumping off a campus building in 2009. The student’s father had sued the university, an administrator, and two faculty members, asserting they should have known that his son, Han Nguyen, was at risk.

“Until today we haven’t had really complex decisions come down from a lot of high state courts on the specific issue of suicide responsibility in colleges,” said Peter F. Lake, a professor of higher-education law at Stetson University. “In some ways this is the first major case.”

Lake said MIT had won the case because university officials had done what the court thought was reasonable, given the circumstances. The unanimous decision does not apply outside Massachusetts, although other courts are likely to consider the ruling if they face similar cases. Still, the decision does not mean that colleges and universities should rest easily. The Massachusetts judges made it clear that colleges do have a responsibility to do what they can to prevent suicide on their campuses.

MIT won the case, but the message to colleges is, you can’t simply look away. You will have some responsibility.

“MIT won the case, but the message to colleges is, you can’t simply look away,” Lake said. “You will have some responsibility.”

In their decision, the judges said that while universities do not have the same high degree of responsibility to students as jails or hospitals do to prisoners or patients, for example, they have a closer relationship to a student than to a passing stranger. They operate sports teams and other activities that might be considered dangerous, and they touch almost all aspects of students’ lives when they are on campus.

“Universities are clearly not bystanders or strangers in regards to their students,” the decision says. “But universities are not responsible for monitoring and controlling all aspects of their students’ lives.”

Daniel S. Medwed, a professor at Northeastern University’s School of Law, said the decision “gives a little bit of guidance in an area that’s very gray.” It says that there are circumstances in which university officials should take action, and it outlines broadly what that action should be.

The judges said that universities must respond when they have “actual knowledge of a student’s suicide attempt that occurred while enrolled at the university or recently before matriculation.” They must also take action if they know about “a student’s stated plans or intentions to commit suicide.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Taking action could mean initiating a suicide-prevention protocol, if one exists, the judges said. It could also mean alerting officials who are “empowered to assist the student” or, if the student refuses care, notifying the student’s emergency contact.

The decision “balances privacy concerns with student health and suicide-prevention concerns,” Medwed said. The judges also took into consideration that the MIT student was 25 and lived off campus.

This is one of a few court decisions this year that will help shape universities’ understanding of their role in student safety, Lake said. In March, California’s highest court ruled that public colleges “must protect their students from foreseeable violence” in a decision that allowed a woman who had been stabbed by a classmate at the University of California at Los Angeles to sue the institution.

“If you put them side to side with each other, they say a lot of the same things,” Lake said of the cases in Massachusetts and California. Though neither MIT nor UCLA was found responsible, he said, higher education in general is “in an age of enhanced accountability.”

Nell Gluckman writes about faculty issues and other topics in higher education. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the May 25, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gluckman_Nell.jpg
About the Author
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Court Decision May Signal More Legal Liability for Colleges Over Violent Crimes

More News

Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.
Tufts University student from Turkey, Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested by immigration agents while walking along a street in a Boston suburb, talks to reporters on arriving back in Boston, Saturday, May 10, 2025, a day after she was released from a Louisiana immigration detention center on the orders of a federal judge. (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi)
Law & Policy
Homeland Security Agents Detail Run-Up to High-Profile Arrests of Pro-Palestinian Scholars

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin