Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Finance

Critics Take Aim (Again) at Rich University Endowments

By Goldie Blumenstyk August 24, 2015

Fat endowments make for attractive, fat targets.

That was true earlier this summer, when the Twitterverse went, well, all atwitter, over the news that John A. Paulson, a hedge-fund mogul, decided to donate $400 million to Harvard, the richest university in the world.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Fat endowments make for attractive, fat targets.

That was true earlier this summer, when the Twitterverse went, well, all atwitter, over the news that John A. Paulson, a hedge-fund mogul, decided to donate $400 million to Harvard, the richest university in the world.

And it seemed true again last week, after Victor Fleischer, a professor of law at the University of San Diego, skewered Yale University in a New York Times op-ed column for paying out $480 million to the equity-fund managers of its endowment, while spending just $170 million on tuition assistance.

Mr. Fleischer’s essay, laden with references to endowment “hoarding” and none-too-subtle questions about the “symbiotic relationship” between elite universities and the hedge-fund managers who donate to them, argued that the management and performance fees that Yale and other universities pay to private-equity managers reveal a deeper problem: “We’ve lost sight of the idea that students, not fund managers, should be the primary beneficiaries of a university’s endowment,” he writes. “The private-equity folks get cash; students take out loans.”

Apparently, that’s the kind of argument that struck a nerve with Times readers — it drew 787 responses before the newspaper closed off comments. Malcolm Gladwell, the author and New Yorker writer, also jumped into the fray, at first issuing a series of snarky tweets about the Wall Street culture overtaking academe …

All the Wall Street analysts are in agreement: Time for Yale to shed the declining legacy educating business.

— Gladwell (@Gladwell) August 19, 2015

… and also about a tax system that favors wealthy institutions at the taxpayers’ expense.

Ivy League students are on the government free lunch program — only the lunch is at Nobu.

— Gladwell (@Gladwell) August 20, 2015

Mr. Gladwell, who was later invited onto NPR’s Weekend Edition Saturday show to explain his outrage, said he’s “gotten increasingly incensed” by the inequality in higher education, a discovery that no doubt prompted many others who have been sounding that alarm for years — groups like the Institute for Higher Education Policy; the Council for Opportunity in Education’s Pell Institute; the Education Trust; and the Center on Education and the Workforce at Georgetown University, to name just a few — to wonder, What took you so long? The economic divide in higher education has been growing for decades.

(This isn’t Mr. Gladwell’s first foray into college matters. He tweeted mockingly about Mr. Paulson’s gift to Harvard, and in his 2013 book David and Goliath, he argues that many students would be better off skipping elite institutions for the sake of their rankings and attending less-prestigious institutions instead, where they could have more chance to rise to the top.)

Mr. Fleischer brought a fresh approach to his analysis with his pointed comparison of financial-aid spending to that of payments to private-equity fund managers (while never quite noting, as BloombergBusiness later did, that Yale’s overall spending from its endowment in 2014, including $830-million in additional expenditures, provided about one-third of the university’s operating budget).

But his argument builds on a noisy, and heretofore unsuccessful, history of endowment shaming, an effort that seemed to have its heyday in 2007. That was the year that U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa, raised his own questions about endowment hoarding, and wealthy colleges found themselves on the defensive to explain the limits to their endowment spending.

Like Mr. Fleischer, Senator Grassley proposed forcing endowments to spend more, although he focused his ire on those with $500-million or more. (There were 136 university endowments in the United States of that size back then; today, with many endowments more than recovered from the Great Recession, there are 166.) Mr. Fleischer proposed that all endowments over $100-million spend at least 8 percent a year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The endowment debate has been a lot quieter since the recession, but it never stopped simmering. In fact, a proposal voiced in 2010 by Charles B. Reed, then chancellor of the California State University system, to penalize endowment-rich institutions that enroll low numbers of Pell Grant students, would fit nicely in the current debate.

And a Nexus Research and Policy Center report last spring by Mark Schneider and Jorge Klor de Alva, pointing to the ways the federal tax system overwhelmingly bestows benefits on wealthy private institutions, compared to the benefits that go to community colleges and public four-year colleges, continues to have the kind of legs its authors hoped it would. Mr. Gladwell, for one, must have found it good reading. He cited several of its findings in his Twitter barrage.

While some of the observers (this author among them) have publicly wondered why so little of the response to Mr. Fleischer’s essay has focused on the private-equity fee structure — and by implication the tax benefits it enjoys — Alexander Holt at New America took a much-bigger-picture point of view. Let Yale spend as much or as little as it wants, he says in a blog post. But since “there’s not much about Yale’s behavior of paying $480 million to equity fund managers versus $170 million for tuition assistance that suggests that Yale’s top priority is ‘dissemination of knowledge,’” he argues, just tax the endowment. “Colleges act like corporations and they should be treated as such,” Mr. Holt writes.

Of course there are plenty of people of people who question whether corporations pay their fair share. So as for the can of worms that proposal would open. …

ADVERTISEMENT

Correction (8/24/2015, 9:28 a.m.): This article originally misidentified John Paulson, who gave $400 million to Harvard. He is a Harvard alumnus but was never secretary of the treasury.

Correction (8/25/2015, 11:30 a.m.): The Pell Institute is a project of the Council for Opportunity in Education, not the Institute for Higher Education Policy, as this article originally reported.

Goldie Blumenstyk writes about the intersection of business and higher education. Check out www.goldieblumenstyk.com for information on her new book about the higher-education crisis; follow her on Twitter @GoldieStandard; or email her at goldie@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Finance & Operations
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Blumenstyk_Goldie.jpg
About the Author
Goldie Blumenstyk
The veteran reporter Goldie Blumenstyk writes a weekly newsletter, The Edge, about the people, ideas, and trends changing higher education. Find her on Twitter @GoldieStandard. She is also the author of the bestselling book American Higher Education in Crisis? What Everyone Needs to Know.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Access & Affordability
Congressional Republicans Want to End Grad PLUS Loans. How Might It Affect Your Campus?
Florida Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, Jr. delivers remarks during the State Board of Education meeting at Winter Park High School, Wednesday, March 27, 2024.
Executive Privilege
In Florida, University Presidents’ Pay Goes Up. Is Politics to Blame?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of a tentacle holding a microscope
The Review | Essay
In Defense of ‘Silly’ Science
By Carly Anne York
Illustration showing a graduate's hand holding a college diploma and another hand but a vote into a ballot box
The Review | Essay
Civics Education Is Back. It Shouldn’t Belong to Conservatives.
By Timothy Messer-Kruse
Photo-based illustration of a hedges shaped like dollar signs in various degrees of having been over-trimmed by a shadowed Donald Trump figure carrying hedge trimmers.
The Review | Essay
What Will Be Left of Higher Ed in Four Years?
By Brendan Cantwell

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin