> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Accreditation
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Despite Fight Over 2-Year College, Accreditor Wins Support for Recognition

By  Eric Kelderman
December 13, 2013
Washington

Emotional testimony from faculty members, students, and union officials from City College of San Francisco was not enough to convince a federal panel on Friday that the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges was not worthy of federal recognition.

The commission was seeking to renew its recognition this week at a meeting of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, an 18-member panel that advises the U.S. secretary of education on accreditation matters.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Emotional testimony from faculty members, students, and union officials from City College of San Francisco was not enough to convince a federal panel on Friday that the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges was not worthy of federal recognition.

The commission was seeking to renew its recognition this week at a meeting of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, an 18-member panel that advises the U.S. secretary of education on accreditation matters.

With only one dissent, the committee voted to recommend that the accreditor continue to be recognized and report to the panel in a year on its efforts to fix more than a dozen deficiencies in its procedures, including ensuring widespread acceptance of its policies and standards by its member colleges and their employees and students.

The vote followed testimony from more than a dozen City College staff members and students, who asked the committee to recommend that the accreditor lose its recognition because of actions the commission had taken in deciding to remove the college’s accreditation.

In July, a year after putting the college on “show cause” status, the commission, part of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, announced that it would strip City College of accreditation in 2014. Because unaccredited colleges cannot receive federal student aid, an institution’s loss of accreditation typically leads to its closure.

ADVERTISEMENT

‘A Tough Call’

After the vote, Lalo Gonzalez, a student at City College and member of its student council, said the accreditor had been unfairly forcing the college to focus too much on degree completion at the expense of its open-access mission. “The standards are completely disconnected from the reality of students,” he said.

Vincent Tarikhu Farrar, chairman of the department of African-American studies at City College, said the accreditor had overstated financial difficulties at the college and was now forcing it to make austerity cuts that would harm students and faculty members.

Programs and courses at City College should be expanded, not cut, to meet the educational demands of the region, Mr. Farrar said.

While committee members voiced their empathy for the plight of students, who will be forced to find another college if the institution closes, some also credited the accreditor for holding the college accountable for its shortfalls.

Jill Derby, a member of the advisory panel and a governance consultant at the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, said the group could not ignore the outcry from students who had traveled all the way from California to register their complaints.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Arthur J. Rothkopf, president emeritus of Lafayette College, said the accreditor should be commended for taking action at a time when accreditors, in general, are being criticized by policy makers for going easy on poorly performing institutions. “The agency made a tough call,” he said. “We need to support the agency.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Law & PolicyPolitical Influence & Activism
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin