Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
College, Reinvented

Ditch the Monograph

By Jennifer Howard October 14, 2012
What If Tenure Didn’t Require a Book? 1
David Schwen for The Chronicle
What if Higher Ed Had a Designated Tax

David Schwen for The Chronicle

A historian or anthropologist spends years working on a monograph, bulking up an argument. A scholarly publisher takes more years to shepherd that argument into print. Meanwhile, academic libraries have ever-smaller amounts of money and space to lavish on such books, which often have more pages than they have readers.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

What if Higher Ed Had a Designated Tax

David Schwen for The Chronicle

A historian or anthropologist spends years working on a monograph, bulking up an argument. A scholarly publisher takes more years to shepherd that argument into print. Meanwhile, academic libraries have ever-smaller amounts of money and space to lavish on such books, which often have more pages than they have readers.

What if scholars, publishers, and tenure-and-promotion committees embraced short-form e-books as a respectable way to deliver serious scholarship? A Kindle Singles model could help academics and publishers pick up the pace of production. It could be priced low enough to appeal to library budgets. It wouldn’t devour precious shelf space. It would suit libraries’ current desire to build up their e-book collections. And it might pull in new readers for serious scholarship.

How to overhaul academe

  • Writing required—in every course
  • 2 presidents for every institution
  • The end of grades
  • Degrees with a price tag
  • Community colleges for real students
  • An NCAA that puts students first
  • High-tech college counseling
  • School at age 3; no more 12th grade
  • Truly global campuses
  • No more monographs
  • The new for-profit: a low-profit
  • Want space? Pay for it
  • Crowd-financed research
  • Faculty trained to teach
  • A tax for higher education

Read more | Send us your ideas

The approach would also free up scholars to write shorter, if that’s what their project called for. Not every idea needs 300-plus pages to fully explore. Daniel Cohen, an associate professor of history at George Mason University and an advocate of revamping the academic-publishing system, calls this “right-sizing scholarship.”

Some scholarly presses are already experimenting with shorter-form publishing. Princeton University Press has a series, Princeton Shorts, that serves up highlights from previously published books. It’s trying what the director, Peter Dougherty, describes as “short-form serialization,” releasing peer-reviewed chapters of a book on the 2012 presidential election by John Sides and Lynn Vavreck, two political scientists. Mr. Dougherty hopes that will help build interest in the final book while giving the press a greater voice in the coverage of contemporary events.

Publishers and authors will have to lead the way, and demonstrate to departments that shorter-form, digital work can be serious work.

Stanford University Press has taken the idea further, recently introducing a series of original short e-books called Stanford Briefs. They take less time and money to publish but “carry just as much academic significance” as traditional long-form monographs, says Alan Harvey, the press’s director. “Our feedback to authors is there’s no reason they shouldn’t count toward tenure and promotion just as much.”

If shorter e-books are going to catch on with academic authors, they’ll have to be taken seriously by disciplinary gatekeepers. Several years ago, the Modern Language Association called on departments of language and literature “to give serious consideration to forms of scholarship other than the monograph in promotion-and-tenure reviews,” says Kathleen Fitzpatrick, the association’s director of scholarly communication, via e-mail. Short e-books are “in keeping with that call.”

Publishers and authors, though, will have to lead the way, and demonstrate to departments that shorter-form, digital work can be serious work. More authors will have to take the leap that Margret Grebowicz, an associate professor of philosophy at Goucher College, is taking.

She’ll publish her next book, Why Internet Porn Matters, as a Stanford Brief next year. (The book is a feminist critique of the social and political consequences of online pornography.) Stanford put the 35,000-word manuscript through rigorous peer review and editing, she says. The press will price the book at around $10—far less than a monograph—and offer her a greater share of the royalties than she usually gets. (That might be a moot point given the market for academic books, she acknowledges.)

Ms. Grebowicz is in a good position to try something different. She has tenure, and she’s published traditional monographs. Still, she expects that many of her colleagues “will react with horror” to the shorter book. “Longer books have greater credibility,” she says, even though few of them find an audience.

If enough scholars and presses are willing to give it a go, serious, short-form digital publishing could help change that.

Correction (10/17/2012, 12:43 p.m.): This article originally stated incorrectly that Princeton University Press plans next year to start releasing peer-reviewed chapters of a book, in an experiment called “short-form serialization.” The press has already begun releasing the book chapters. The article has been updated to reflect this correction.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Jennifer Howard
Jennifer Howard, who began writing for The Chronicle in 2005, covered publishing, scholarly communication, libraries, archives, digital humanities, humanities research, and technology.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.
lab-costs-promo.jpg
Research Expenses
What Does It Cost to Run a Lab?
Research illustration Microscope
Dreams Deferred
How Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Are Derailing Young Scholars’ Careers

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

Chronfest25_Virtual-Events_Page_862x574.png
Chronicle Festival: Innovation Amid Uncertainty
07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin