> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
The Review
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Do we need more university presses? Fewer?

June 4, 2017

There are about 125 university presses, and somewhere around 4,000 institutions of higher learning. For decades, universities that don’t have presses have relied on the few that do for the scholarly production of their faculty. University presses became the gatekeepers and validators not only of the tenure system but also of faculty productivity. Most people within the university-press system believe it’s time all universities should contribute to support scholarly and creative production. We need more university presses, not fewer.—Dan Williams

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

There are about 125 university presses, and somewhere around 4,000 institutions of higher learning. For decades, universities that don’t have presses have relied on the few that do for the scholarly production of their faculty. University presses became the gatekeepers and validators not only of the tenure system but also of faculty productivity. Most people within the university-press system believe it’s time all universities should contribute to support scholarly and creative production. We need more university presses, not fewer.—Dan Williams

•

The same or slightly fewer, though that is not likely to be a very popular answer. There are likely too many specialized books published each year — and because library monograph budgets have been decimated in the post-recession period, there is simply not enough of a remaining market to truly sustain this level of output. —Leila Salisbury

•

Review - Publishing Package
The Future of the University Press
Publishers, press directors, editors, scholars, and other insiders share their views on the state and future of academic publishing.
  • Our Contributors
  • What is the most common misunderstanding that scholars have about university presses?
  • Scholarly prose gets a bad rap. Is it deserved?
  • How will university presses look 20 years from now?
  • How should the university press role in hiring and promotion change?
  • What book do you wish someone would write?
  • What is the biggest challenge in university-press publishing?
  • What topic areas are overpublished?
  • Acquisitions editors are overwhelmingly white. How does this affect what gets published?

The number of university presses is about right. Since commercial publishers have almost no interest in the value of scholarship (except insofar as it serves the interests of shareholders), fewer university presses necessarily means fewer publications in scholarly disciplines and safer and more conventional approaches to topics of general interest. —David Rosenbaum

ADVERTISEMENT

•

We need more university presses, not fewer. The next generation of scholars will find a narrower range of publishing possibilities if the number of publishers shrinks, and our conversation about things important will be greatly reduced. —Sandra Dijkstra

•

We need more nimble university presses — presses willing to experiment with new forms of publication. And if that means that we need more university presses than we currently have now, then yes, we need more.— Matthew K. Gold

•

ADVERTISEMENT

Consolidation is dangerous but probably necessary. There are economies of scale, particularly in production, sales, publicity, marketing, and fulfillment. Perhaps a consortia model would work, the way Perseus was set up before its sale to Hachette: independent editorial imprints that shared back-end services. —Wendy Strothman

•

In my perfect world there are a dozen or so consortia defined by geography, where each university in the region exists as an imprint under one large umbrella group. —Justin Race

•

I would be much more interested in seeing institutions that do not have presses routinely develop subvention funds for scholars, which would help alleviate some of the costs of their books’ production.—Dawn Durante

ADVERTISEMENT

•

It’s always tempting to respond to such questions by saying “more.” But even the best parties, populated by the most delightful people and with the most delicious food, sometimes become crowded. And “fewer” doesn’t seem a very smart answer as it would inevitably increase workloads and expenses among the remaining presses, as well as potentially diminish opportunities for authors and readers. —Bruce Austin

•

I would phrase the question somewhat differently. We need fewer books. This is the elephant in the living room. There is an oversupply of books as a result of current tenure requirements. This is happening as library budgets are flat or cut. Who is going to buy these books if there is not enough money for them all to be acquired? What really needs to happen is a change in tenure requirements. Not every scholar in every type of institution (research university, liberal-arts college, community college) should be required to write a book. —Beatrice Rehl

•

ADVERTISEMENT

University presses offer such an important alternative to commercial academic publishers that it would be terrible to lose any of them. The partnership they provide for academic authors, and the value they provide to society, simply can’t be replicated by other publishing models. —Gita Devi Manaktala

•

We certainly don’t need fewer. There’s a great value in having a diversity of university presses, some large, some small, each with a distinctive profile. —Laurie Matheson

•

More university presses? I’d rather see a more coherent vision of university-based publishing. — Richard Brown

ADVERTISEMENT

A version of this article appeared in the June 9, 2017, issue.
Read other items in this The Future of the University Press package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Opinion
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin