Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Learning

Does Reading on Computer Screens Affect Student Learning?

By Emma Pettit June 22, 2016
Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor at American U.: The mind-set with reading on a computer screen is “I’m studying for a test, and this piece of text is not going to become a part of who I am.”
Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor at American U.: The mind-set with reading on a computer screen is “I’m studying for a test, and this piece of text is not going to become a part of who I am.”American U.

Seven years ago Naomi S. Baron walked past her campus bookstore, noticed a sign advertising digital-textbook rentals, and started to worry.

Ms. Baron, a professor of linguistics at American University and author of Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World, studies the knotted relationship between technology and language. To her, the sign was a harbinger. It foretold a world where students would absorb less from the readings they did on the campus, as they temporarily interacted with texts online before casting them off and never returning.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor at American U.: The mind-set with reading on a computer screen is “I’m studying for a test, and this piece of text is not going to become a part of who I am.”
Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor at American U.: The mind-set with reading on a computer screen is “I’m studying for a test, and this piece of text is not going to become a part of who I am.”American U.

Seven years ago Naomi S. Baron walked past her campus bookstore, noticed a sign advertising digital-textbook rentals, and started to worry.

Ms. Baron, a professor of linguistics at American University and author of Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World, studies the knotted relationship between technology and language. To her, the sign was a harbinger. It foretold a world where students would absorb less from the readings they did on the campus, as they temporarily interacted with texts online before casting them off and never returning.

The mind-set with reading on a computer or tablet screen, says Ms. Baron, becomes “I’m studying for a test, and this piece of text is not going to become a part of who I am.”

Ms. Baron is not the only professor worried about how reading on screens affects student learning. The question was submitted by a Chronicle reader in our recent call to suggest a topic we should investigate, and it received the most votes from other readers.

The question was sent in by Michelle Blake, an adjunct professor of English at West Chester University of Pennsylvania. Ms. Blake became curious about the subject after she noticed that her students’ eyes seemed to glide over obvious errors in their papers while reading aloud. She wondered how the web affected students’ ability to engage with texts.

In search of an answer, we talked to several professors both about their research on the issue and their interactions with students. So far the major research findings on the topic are mixed, but scholars we spoke to agreed that how students digest knowledge in a digital world is unlike how they have ever done it before.

‘Wheat From the Chaff’

A few studies have found little difference in retention when students read on a screen versus in print, though one, from Norway’s University of Stavanger, did suggest that high-school students remember less when they read a text digitally.

Some evidence exists that when students multitask (or are faced with the temptations of internet access), their comprehension dips. But as of yet, it’s unclear what role screens play in that outcome.

Ms. Baron says researchers cannot rely on students’ immediate recall of what they just read, as most studies have done so far. How that text might have shifted their thinking, influenced their analysis, fostered their emotional growth, or nested in their brains for years are all variables to consider that are not yet easily measurable.

This is a question we have to ask. But we haven’t figured out how to ask it in a really meaningful way.

“This is a question we have to ask,” Ms. Baron says. “But we haven’t figured out how to ask it in a really meaningful way.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Baron says her research shows that students are more engrossed in the material when they read it in print. She surveyed 429 college students in five countries and asked them on which medium they concentrated best when reading. Ninety-two percent answered print.

The results solidified her hunch that students have trouble switching into academic-reading mode when the text is on a screen. With screens, you are conditioned to skim and scan, argues Ms. Baron. It is difficult for students to read deeply when they scroll through Baldwin or Chaucer in the same way they consume headlines from CNN.

Ms. Baron also says screen reading has distorted how students encounter printed works by altering their attention spans. Once, after she delivered a guest lecture, a student approached her and said that he loved to read in print but that, when he does, he constantly feels as if he is about to be interrupted by a ping from his phone.

Kaveri Subrahmanyam, chair of the department of child and family studies at California State University at Los Angeles, conducted a study that found no noticeable disparity between reading in print and on a screen.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Subrahmanyam says some divergence between print and screen reading might have arisen if the study had examined long-term effects. (She and her colleagues tested comprehension immediately after students had completed an exercise.)

The reading brain is literally molting under everyone’s fingertips.

Based on her teaching experience, Ms. Subrahmanyam says she is fairly certain that the two reading processes are substantially different. She and her colleagues have witnessed that difference in their own students. Students in her courses today are much less likely to retain information than those 20 years ago, says Ms. Subrahmanyam, possibly due to screens.

“Sometimes we laugh and say maybe we’re just getting older, getting less tolerant,” Ms. Subrahmanyam says.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sandra L. Calvert, a professor of psychology at Georgetown University, noticed similar retention problems in her students when they took notes with computers. Those who tapped on their keyboards and stared at their laptops copied her words verbatim. But they did not seem engaged with the lesson she was teaching.

Physically scribbling in margins, underlining, and highlighting — both for taking notes and reading — allow students to locate real substance and “pick out the wheat from the chaff,” says Ms. Calvert, adding that screens can inhibit that information-harvesting process.

The ‘Reading Circuit’

Maryanne Wolf is among those exploring how screen reading might be altering adolescent brains. Ms. Wolf, director of the Center for Reading and Language Research at Tufts University, chronicled the development of the reading brain in her book Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain.

After seven years of research, Ms. Wolf says, she had to change a few chapters right before publication because she realized, due to screens, that “the reading brain is literally molting under everyone’s fingertips.” Ms. Wolf thinks the prevalence of screen reading at a young age could warp the formation of the “reading circuit” in the brain, making children too reliant on “external platforms,” like the internet, for knowledge.

ADVERTISEMENT

But not all academics think screen reading could lead to such dire outcomes.

Mark Marino, an associate professor of writing at the University of Southern California, says online texts provide a resource that print cannot: hyperlinks. Students can click on a linked reference in a text and understand it against the larger backdrop of discourse, Mr. Marino notes.

Online texts also tend to be cheaper than printed textbooks, which can help a student’s budget.

The issue will probably continue to resonate with college professors, especially while evidence is largely anecdotal and studies are inconclusive. The heart of the matter may simply be the changing habits and attitudes of students toward their studies — essentially, a cultural divide between professors and pupils.


Join the conversation about this article on the Re:Learning Facebook page.

Read other items in Mapping the New Education Landscape.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Technology
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Emma-Pettit.png
About the Author
Emma Pettit
Emma Pettit is a senior reporter at The Chronicle who covers the ways people within higher ed work and live — whether strange, funny, harmful, or hopeful. She’s also interested in political interference on campus, as well as overlooked crevices of academe, such as a scrappy puppetry program at an R1 university and a charmed football team at a Kansas community college. Follow her on Twitter at @EmmaJanePettit, or email her at emma.pettit@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Department Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.
Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin