Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
The Review

Don’t Be Fooled: There Is a Free-Speech Crisis

Polls show most students support free speech — all the more reason to protect it

By Oliver Traldi April 23, 2018
Protesters gathered outside an event featuring Attorney General Jeff Sessions at Georgetown U. in September.
Protesters gathered outside an event featuring Attorney General Jeff Sessions at Georgetown U. in September.Chronicle photo by Julia Schmalz

Recent surveys of college students have cast doubt on the idea that they are largely opposed to free speech. But even if the data is right, what really matters about student opposition to free speech is not its prevalence but its zealousness. The danger of a sentiment depends not just on the number of its adherents but on the intensity of their belief. Racist ideology in America, for instance,

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Recent surveys of college students have cast doubt on the idea that they are largely opposed to free speech. But even if the data is right, what really matters about student opposition to free speech is not its prevalence but its zealousness. The danger of a sentiment depends not just on the number of its adherents but on the intensity of their belief. Racist ideology in America, for instance, has eroded among both Democrats and Republicans over the past few decades. But in that time it has also coalesced: More extreme strategies and tactics have begun to take hold among those attached to the waning view. So it is with opposition to free speech. It should come as no surprise, therefore, that during the protests at Yale in the fall of 2015, it was precisely a forum on free speech whose attendees were spat upon, or that during the same season’s protests at Missouri it was a student journalist who was “muscled” out of a protest.


Also important is the anti-speech movement’s support by powerful administrators. Just as the alt-right’s connections to the Trump administration render it a legitimate threat, so, too, do student ideologues’ allies in college administrations make small groups of hecklers far more powerful than they would otherwise be. Diversity officers and vice deans of equity and inclusion will explicitly support protesters. It was just such an administrator who cut off Christina Hoff Sommers during her talk at Lewis & Clark College last month. Invited by the Law School’s chapter of the conservative Federalist Society, Sommers was interrupted by protesters singing “No platform for fascists,” as the journalist Andy C. Ngo documented. Faculty members offer a different kind of support. Yale’s Jason Stanley and Cornell’s Kate Manne, for instance, wrote in 2015 that it was the student activists at Yale who truly believed in free speech, and not the conference attendees they spat upon.


In their demands and their rhetoric, protesting student groups have recently emphasized their links with supportive faculty and administrators. This is what the Harvard Law professor Jeannie Suk Gersen called “a new family feeling on campus” — protests were outbursts of pain designed to induce more emotional warmth and caretaking. There is thus a symbiotic relationship between activist fervor and administrative bloat.


Bureaucratization and university corporatization are increasingly rendering the free-speech situation on campus more and more like the miserable state of expressive rights in the American workplace. The perilous position of adjunct teachers makes them highly unlikely to voice any kind of controversial view. The logic of branding makes professors and students alike de facto public-relations officers for a university. As the Chicago Tribune reported, when Northwestern University removed Alice Dreger’s guest-edited issue of its medical journal Atrium, Dreger says the administration explained its actions with “explicit reference to a brand.” Meanwhile, campus speech is judged for whether it is “aligned with our mission”; campus association, for whether it “uphold[s] the institution’s core values.”


At Vox, Matt Yglesias argues against the idea that there is a free-speech crisis on campus by emphasizing three aspects of the survey data. First, support for free speech is growing. Second, college students are unusually supportive of free speech compared with other age groups. Third, left-wing beliefs correlate with support for free speech rather than opposition to it: “Extreme liberals” express the most support for free speech, and “extreme conservatives” the least.


But how do these facts relate to the notion of crisis? The growth of support for free speech is likely a cause of the shared sense of concern about its suppression. This felt support is not victorious simply by existing; it must be translated into campus policy, which seems to be what writers like Yglesias oppose. Similarly, that college students are unusually supportive of free speech means precisely that in better respecting free expression, colleges will also better serve their students. But a group of left-wing and liberal writers have branded the concern for free speech a conservative one, despite the fact that such ardent free-speech advocates as Noam Chomsky argue that their position emerges from principle, not partisanship. The polls Yglesias discusses provide strong evidence that free-speech advocates are not the crypto-conservatives they’re often accused of being.


There is something very strange in the notion that polling evidence showing broad student support for free speech would mean there’s no free-speech crisis on campus. In fact, it suggests that the very real attacks on free speech are all the more scandalous insofar as they lack broad student support. Last month Reed College’s Lucía Martínez Valdivia spoke at Lafayette College’s Mill Series about her experience being confronted and outnumbered by student activists. Those activists wanted to topple Reed’s supposedly white-supremacist humanities survey course, in which Valdivia lectured in her capacity as a scholar of early-modern literature. At the Mill Series event, student support for free speech was a matter of debate. The faculty audience members who praised student protesters took the view that a silent majority of students, or at least a significant plurality, supported the student activists who disrupted Valdivia’s class. Valdivia, on the other hand, proceeded from the premise that most students support free speech. Shouldn’t the recent rash of experiences like hers strike writers like Yglesias as a crisis?


What nobody disputed was that a small cadre of activists — in this case, 20 students in a classroom of 400 — were able to wrest control of a class or event from a professor or speaker despite their group’s small size. Such temporary coups occur over and over again. That is the crisis. And if most students are uncomfortable with it, all the more reason to address it with the urgency and seriousness it merits.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Free Speech
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Oliver Traldi
Oliver Traldi is a graduate student in philosophy at the University of Notre Dame and a writing fellow at Heterodox Academy.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin