> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Duke to Pay $112.5 Million to Settle Scientific-Misconduct Lawsuit

By  Zipporah Osei
March 25, 2019
Duke is alleged to have accepted $200 million in federal research grants after submitting falsified and fabricated lab results.
Good Free Photos
Duke is alleged to have accepted $200 million in federal research grants after submitting falsified and fabricated lab results.

Duke University will pay $112.5 million to settle a lawsuit over its alleged submission of falsified data to obtain $200 million in federal research grants.

The lawsuit, filed by a former lab analyst, Joseph Thomas, alleged that from 2006 to 2013 a research technician, Erin Potts-Kant, fabricated data that Duke used to get research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Thomas also alleged in the lawsuit, filed under the False Claims Act, that Duke covered up the fraud. The university said on Monday in a written statement that its officials discovered the possible fraud only in 2013, after Potts-Kant was fired for embezzlement. The university did not initially understand “the extent of her research misconduct.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Duke is alleged to have accepted $200 million in federal research grants after submitting falsified and fabricated lab results.
Good Free Photos
Duke is alleged to have accepted $200 million in federal research grants after submitting falsified and fabricated lab results.

Duke University will pay $112.5 million to settle a lawsuit over its alleged submission of falsified data to obtain $200 million in federal research grants.

The lawsuit, filed by a former lab analyst, Joseph Thomas, alleged that from 2006 to 2013 a research technician, Erin Potts-Kant, fabricated data that Duke used to get research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Thomas also alleged in the lawsuit, filed under the False Claims Act, that Duke covered up the fraud. The university said on Monday in a written statement that its officials discovered the possible fraud only in 2013, after Potts-Kant was fired for embezzlement. The university did not initially understand “the extent of her research misconduct.”

The Department of Justice, which joined the whistle-blower lawsuit, said on Monday in its own statement that the settlement sends a “strong message that fraud and dishonesty will not be tolerated in the research-funding process.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Individuals and institutions that receive research funding from the federal government must be scrupulous in conducting research for the common good and rigorous in rooting out fraud,” said Matthew G.T. Martin, the U.S. attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina, in the statement. “May this serve as a lesson that the use of false or fabricated data in grant applications or reports is completely unacceptable.”

Vincent E. Price, Duke’s president, said in the statement that the university was taking steps to improve research integrity.

“We expect Duke researchers to adhere always to the highest standards of integrity, and virtually all of them do that with great dedication,” said Price. “When individuals fail to uphold those standards, and those who are aware of possible wrongdoing fail to report it, as happened in this case, we must accept responsibility, acknowledge that our processes for identifying and preventing misconduct did not work, and take steps to improve.”

12 Papers Retracted

Potts-Kant, a former researcher in the pulmonary, allergy, and critical-care departments of Duke Health, has had more than 12 scientific papers retracted since news broke of the allegedly falsified data, according to Duke’s student newspaper, The Chronicle. Duke said in its statement that it had retracted scientific publications that relied on the data.

The settlement includes reimbursement for 30 grants received as a result of the falsified data, as well as associated penalties. Thomas will receive more than $33 million in the settlement, according to the Justice Department.

ADVERTISEMENT

The National Institutes of Health imposed additional regulations on Duke researchers in April 2018, according to the student paper. Researchers applying for grants of less than $250,000 are required to provide a detailed budget.

Price said in the statement that the university had already made changes to promote scientific integrity. The university appointed Geeta Swamy as associate vice provost and vice dean for scientific integrity in November 2018. Duke also began requiring science and accountability plans for all School of Medicine units and started an Office of Scientific Integrity.

“Through these efforts, many of which have been underway for several years, we aim to promote and adhere to the highest standards of research excellence and integrity,” Price said. “Our difficulties in ferreting out and ending such misconduct remind us that important work remains to be done.”

Price also announced new steps in response to the settlement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Duke will appoint an Advisory Panel on Research Integrity and Excellence that will provide recommendations to the university by June 30. It will also create an executive oversight committee, led by A. Eugene Washington, chancellor for health affairs.

“We continue to have great confidence in the high quality of Duke faculty and their research,” Price said. “This settlement, which results primarily from willful misconduct that took place in one laboratory, but which affected the work of many more researchers, should not diminish the life-changing and life-saving work that takes place at every day at Duke.”

The settlement announced on Monday is Duke’s latest brush with research misconduct. The university accepted the resignation of a cancer researcher in 2010 for alleged misconduct.

Zipporah Osei is an editorial intern at The Chronicle. Follow her on Twitter @zipporahosei, or email her at zipporah.osei@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the April 5, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Finance & OperationsScholarship & Research
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin