Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Academic Freedom

Dust-Up Involving Conservative Student Sparks Political Uproar in Nebraska

By Eric Kelderman September 21, 2017
Kaitlyn Mullen (center, in navy-blue shirt) and other students represented Turning Point USA in August at the U. of Nebraska at Lincoln student union. A lecturer berated her, using profanity, for trying to recruit students to the conservative group.
Kaitlyn Mullen (center, in navy-blue shirt) and other students represented Turning Point USA in August at the U. of Nebraska at Lincoln student union. A lecturer berated her, using profanity, for trying to recruit students to the conservative group. Adam Warner, The Omaha World-Herald

By some measures, the protest that occurred at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln on August 25 was relatively minor: Courtney Lawton, a graduate student and lecturer was caught on video making rude gestures and using profanity as she confronted Kaitlyn Mullen, a student promoting the conservative group Turning Point USA. Ms. Lawton and Amanda Gailey, an associate professor who brought a sign to the student union, were called out on Turning Point’s website after the protest, though Ms. Gailey had largely stood off to the side and only engaged the student by offering help.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Kaitlyn Mullen (center, in navy-blue shirt) and other students represented Turning Point USA in August at the U. of Nebraska at Lincoln student union. A lecturer berated her, using profanity, for trying to recruit students to the conservative group.
Kaitlyn Mullen (center, in navy-blue shirt) and other students represented Turning Point USA in August at the U. of Nebraska at Lincoln student union. A lecturer berated her, using profanity, for trying to recruit students to the conservative group. Adam Warner, The Omaha World-Herald

By some measures, the protest that occurred at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln on August 25 was relatively minor: Courtney Lawton, a graduate student and lecturer was caught on video making rude gestures and using profanity as she confronted Kaitlyn Mullen, a student promoting the conservative group Turning Point USA. Ms. Lawton and Amanda Gailey, an associate professor who brought a sign to the student union, were called out on Turning Point’s website after the protest, though Ms. Gailey had largely stood off to the side and only engaged the student by offering help.

In all, there were just a handful of protesters, no physical violence or vandalism, and the whole confrontation was over in little more than an hour.

But the incident has caused a political uproar. One of the university’s regents has questioned whether the institution has properly disciplined the two instructors, and several state legislators have called for both of them to be fired.

Those responses have some faculty members feeling vulnerable, fearful of backlash over their views, and worried that their university won’t support them in the face of public pressure.

I showed up that day to oppose Turning Point, not to censor them. I never questioned their right to be on campus.

Many on campus are now anxious that their teaching and research, and even their personal political views, could be attacked by groups like Turning Point USA, said Julia Schleck, president of the state conference of the American Association of University Professors and an associate professor of English at the Lincoln campus. Faculty members and graduate students fear the administration may bow to political pressure to discipline them, Ms. Schleck said, rather than protect them from such attacks.

Ronnie D. Green, chancellor of the Lincoln campus, said the institution’s response in such situations is based wholly on the facts. “We investigated the incident from all angles,” he said. That inquiry was completed by September 7 and resulted in a disciplinary action for the grad-student instructor and no finding of fault for the full-time faculty member.

Despite the current political turbulence, Mr. Green said he is not worried about retribution from state lawmakers. And he has not sensed any chilling effect on the faculty’s speaking out about the issues. “I think people feel very supported here,” Mr. Green said.

Negative Reactions

The incident comes at a time when colleges — especially public ones — are under increased pressure from conservative political groups seeking to counter what they see as a liberal bias in academe. Turning Point USA has taken on a major role in this effort, expanding its presence on campuses and even secretly pouring money and resources into the campaigns of some student-government candidates.

On August 25, Ms. Mullen, a second-year student, set up a table near the student union to promote Turning Point USA, which is not yet a registered student organization at the university. (Reached by email, Ms. Mullen offered to comment for this article but failed to do so before publication.) A university staff member mistakenly told Ms. Mullen that she was not in the university’s “free-speech zone” and asked her to move to another area near the student union, but she declined.

ADVERTISEMENT

Among the small group that assembled later to protest against Turning Point USA was Ms. Lawton, a doctoral student and lecturer in English.

Ms. Lawton carried a sign that read, “Just Say No! To Neo-Fascists.” In addition, she marched and chanted near the table, using profanity and deriding Ms. Mullen. Ms. Lawton could not be reached for comment.

Amanda Gailey, an associate professor of English, held her own protest sign. She says she offered to help the student working for Turning Point USA.
Amanda Gailey, an associate professor of English, held her own protest sign. She says she offered to help the student working for Turning Point USA. Courtesy Amanda Gailey

Ms. Gailey, an associate professor of English, also went to the protest, and carried a sign that asked for Turning Point USA to put her on the group’s controversial Professor Watchlist. Ms. Gailey, according to numerous accounts, did not confront Ms. Mullen and even offered to help her when she appeared distraught.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I showed up that day to oppose Turning Point,” Ms. Gailey said, “not to censor them. I never questioned their right to be on campus.”

By that evening, however, a video of the protest from Ms. Mullen had been widely shared on social media, and the negative reactions began pouring in.

On Monday morning, August 28, administrators spoke separately for several hours to Ms. Mullen and the two instructors, as well as to several staff members who were at the scene, said Mr. Green, the chancellor. University officials also reviewed the security footage of the incident, he said.

Following that inquiry, Ms. Lawton was removed from her teaching duties because of concerns for her safety, Mr. Green said. Ms. Lawton was also given a separate disciplinary action, he said, but he declined to elaborate, calling the matter confidential.

ADVERTISEMENT

The university found no reason to discipline Ms. Gailey, said Mr. Green.

On September 7, the university released a statement that its investigation “related to the exchange between a student and a lecturer that took place Aug. 25" had concluded.

“Our expectations for civility were not met by the lecturer in her behavior toward a student,” the statement read.

But the explanations from the university have not satisfied Hal Daub, a regent and former mayor of Omaha who has deep ties to the state’s Republican Party. In an August 30th radio interview, Mr. Daub questioned the accounts of Ms. Gailey’s actions, saying video evidence could dispel her story.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So there can be no manufactured excuses like, ‘Oh, I was just there trying to, uh, talk with her, hold her hand,’ That’s a bunch of bunk,” Mr. Daub told the radio host Gary Sadlemyer.

In an interview with The Chronicle, Mr. Daub said he was just raising the question, and that he and other board members were awaiting more details on the university’s findings.

He added that he real issue here was not freedom of speech, but the conduct of Ms. Lawton and Ms. Gailey. “Certainly, threatening gestures and swear words have no place,” he said.

“No one is saying teachers aren’t entitled to their point of view or in the proper time and place to express their point of view,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some elected officials have taken Mr. Daub’s doubts a step further and painted a picture that differed drastically from the university’s findings.

On his legislative website, State Sen. Steve Erdman calls for Ms. Gailey to be fired, saying she “berated and intimidated” Ms. Mullen. He also cites Mr. Daub’s saying her actions were “a premeditated and organized effort to intimidate and shut down Kaitlyn Mullen.”

In an interview, State Senator Erdman acknowledged that he had spoken with university officials and that their findings are far different. Supposedly, Ms. Gailey “went to her aid,” he said, “that’s their explanation.”

‘In This Kind of Limbo’

While the university’s actions and conclusions have not appeased Mr. Daub and elected officials, they have also left many faculty members questioning whether the university would bow to political pressures.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a letter to Mr. Green, the national office of the AAUP asserted that the university did not follow due process in suspending Ms. Lawton, and that the safety concerns cited for removing her from the classroom may have been a pretense. That’s because neither she nor the campus police had identified any active threats against her, the letter stated. In addition, there was no stated end date for the suspension, raising a concern that the action was meant to be a dismissal.

The local AAUP chapter wrote that although some may disagree with Ms. Lawton’s profanity, the bounds of professional civility required in the classroom do not extend to speech outside that area.

Certainly, threatening gestures and swear words have no place.

Ms. Lawton’s speech on August 25 “happened outside any teaching or instructional context, and thus falls under protected First Amendment rights, however offensive it may be to some members of our community or the public.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Gailey said the university’s response has left her exposed to a backlash.

The chairman of the English department and the dean of the College of Arts and Sciences have been helpful and supportive, Ms. Gailey said, but the university’s official statements have done nothing to clear her name.

“I’ve never been accused or heard anyone insinuate that I’ve done anything improper that day,” Ms. Gailey said in an interview. And yet, “there seems to be baffling motivations about clearing the air about what happened,” she said.

“I’m in this kind of limbo: There was never a real accusation to reach any conclusion about,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Gailey doesn’t expect the university to weigh in on the politics of the confrontation. “But because I played ball and didn’t speak to the press,” she said, “I think it was fair for me to expect that they release a statement that I have been found faultless.”

Mr. Green said that he had conveyed that information to the elected officials, as well as to the executive committee of the Faculty Senate.

The president of the Faculty Senate, Sarah Purcell, said Mr. Green was very clear that Ms. Gailey had been cleared of any wrongdoing. And she disputed the idea that faculty members are now fearful of any political retribution, either from advocacy groups like Turning Point USA or elected officials.

“Maybe it’s ‘Nebraska nice,’ or not wanting to add fuel to a fire that someone else started, or maybe the feeling that the University of Nebraska was a target. There is no fear,” Ms. Purcell said in an email.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Schleck, president of the Nebraska AAUP conference, says that such a disclosure at a confidential meeting of Faculty Senate leaders hardly qualifies as a public clearing of Ms. Gailey.

Some individual faculty members are also speaking out on behalf of the two instructors. Frances W. Kaye, a professor of English, led a rally this past Monday at the university to “change the narrative” about the incident, she said.

“The only student being silenced is the graduate student,” said Ms. Kaye, referring to Ms. Lawton. “The undergraduate student was not silenced,” she said, and “free speech doesn’t mean there can be no dissent.”

Eric Kelderman writes about money and accountability in higher education, including such areas as state policy, accreditation, and legal affairs. You can find him on Twitter @etkeld, or email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the October 6, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Inside a Stealth Plan for Political Influence
What It’s Like to Be Named to a Watch List of ‘Anti-American’ Professors
University Leaders Should Plan for Another Year of Campus-Speech Protests. Here’s How.

More News

Graphic vector illustration of a ship with education-like embellishments being tossed on a black sea with a Kraken-esque elephant trunk ascending from the depth against a stormy red background.
Creeping concerns
Most Colleges Aren’t a Target of Trump (Yet). Here’s How Their Presidents Are Leading.
Photo-based illustration of calendars on a wall (July, August and September) with a red line marking through most of the dates
'A Creative Solution'
Facing Federal Uncertainty, Swarthmore Makes a Novel Plan: the 3-Month Budget
Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests

From The Review

Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin