Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

Education Dept. Endorses Sallie Mae’s Ties to USA Funds but Asks More Questions

By Paul Basken July 2, 2008
Washington

The Education Department, after an internal review, has upheld its December 2004 decision to permit a contractual arrangement between Sallie Mae, the nation’s largest student-loan company, and USA Funds, the nation’s largest guarantee agency.

“We are confident with the decision, which was a legal one, and we find no reason to change or revisit it,” James F. Manning, the department’s deputy chief operating officer in charge of federal student aid, said on Tuesday in a written statement.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The Education Department, after an internal review, has upheld its December 2004 decision to permit a contractual arrangement between Sallie Mae, the nation’s largest student-loan company, and USA Funds, the nation’s largest guarantee agency.

“We are confident with the decision, which was a legal one, and we find no reason to change or revisit it,” James F. Manning, the department’s deputy chief operating officer in charge of federal student aid, said on Tuesday in a written statement.

Separately, however, the Education Department said it had sent a survey to all 35 guarantee agencies in the federal system of subsidized student loans, asking a series of questions about their operations and contractual relationships. The survey, in a three-page letter dated June 11, requests responses from the guarantors by July 11, according to a copy provided by the department to The Chronicle.

Guarantee agencies are nonprofit entities whose duties include contacting borrowers who fall behind in repaying their loans, and relaying the federal reimbursement for defaulted borrowers to the loan companies after ensuring that the lender has complied with the terms of the program.

Federal law prohibits a guarantee agency from hiring any outside party to help it keep borrowers on their repayment schedules if that entity also holds the loan. Sallie Mae has a contractual relationship with USA Funds in which it performs such work on behalf of USA Funds. In its December 2004 ruling, the Education Department agreed to permit that relationship despite objections from its inspector general.

A copy of the contract between Sallie Mae and USA Funds, obtained last month by The Chronicle, demonstrates a relationship that some student-aid experts say is so close and harmful to the interests of students and taxpayers that it should have been ruled a violation of the law (The Chronicle, June 26).

“The contract is saying that USA Funds is the guarantor in name only,” Larry Oxendine, who was the department’s director of student-aid policy and analysis before he retired last summer, said last week after being shown a copy of the 51-page document. “Sallie Mae does everything and makes all the decisions on behalf of USA Funds.”

Both Sallie Mae and USA Funds reject such complaints. “Our contract with USA Funds has resulted in substantial savings for students and taxpayers,” said Tom Joyce, a spokesman for Sallie Mae. Sallie Mae bought the parent company of USA Funds in 2000 and then spun off USA Funds as an independent entity, while simultaneously entering into the contractual relationship.

Reinforcing a 2004 Decision

Mr. Manning, in his statement on Tuesday, upheld the department’s 2004 decision that Sallie Mae’s arrangement with USA Funds was within the law. That decision was issued by Matteo Fontana, a former Sallie Mae employee who was serving at the time as head of the Education Department office that oversees lenders and guarantee agencies. Mr. Fontana rejected a recommendation by the department’s inspector general to forbid the relationship, saying it was legal because the Sallie Mae subsidiary that tracks borrowers on behalf of USA Funds had a separate tax-identification number.

Because federal loans are issued with a guarantee of repayment to the lender by the government, the law requires a separation between the lender and guarantor to help ensure that the amount of a loan in default does not unduly grow without sufficient attempts to contact the borrower.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some student advocates questioned Mr. Manning’s new endorsement of Mr. Fontana’s conclusion. That interpretation does not seem justified, especially in light of the extensive financial relationship between Sallie Mae and USA Funds detailed in the newly publicized contract, said Robert M. Shireman, a former White House and Congressional policy adviser who now serves as president of the Institute for College Access & Success.

“Given that USA Funds is responsible to U.S. taxpayers for overseeing Sallie Mae’s role in the federal student-loan program, this problem deserves more than the official shrug that it is currently getting from the Department of Education,” Mr. Shireman said.

The Education Department, however, said in its June 11 letter to guarantee agencies that it’s trying to learn more about potential conflicts in relations between guarantors and lenders. The letter specifically mentions the department’s interest in enforcing the prohibition against a lender performing borrower-tracking services on behalf of guarantors.

Along with requesting copies of contracts between the guarantor and any service providers, the department’s letter requests a series of details about the officers and directors of the guarantee agencies, including any potential conflicts in their personal financial interests.

ADVERTISEMENT

An Education Department spokesman said he could provide no further detail on what prompted the letter, which was signed by Richard Criswell, a specialist in the Office of Federal Student Aid.

The department’s departing inspector general, John P. Higgins Jr., said in an interview on Thursday that he relayed a copy of the Sallie Mae contract with USA Funds to Mr. Manning after it was detailed by The Chronicle. Mr. Manning promised to review the contract’s terms to see whether the degree of financial connection between the two entities had “gotten better or worse” since the 2004 ruling, said Mr. Higgins, who began his retirement on Tuesday.

The Education Department spokesman, who declined to be identified by name, said Mr. Manning had issued his statement on Tuesday in support of the 2004 ruling as a response to The Chronicle report detailing the Sallie Mae contract with USA Funds. The spokesman said, however, that he could not confirm whether Mr. Manning had reviewed the contract before issuing the statement.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Paul Basken Bio
About the Author
Paul Basken
Paul Basken was a government policy and science reporter with The Chronicle of Higher Education, where he won an annual National Press Club award for exclusives.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Department Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.
Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin