Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Global

Education Trends in East Asia Could Disrupt Flow of Students to U.S.

By Karin Fischer May 19, 2014
Expanded educational opportunites at home, including this campus, the result of a partnership with the State U. 
of New York, have contributed to a decrease in the number of South Korean students in the United States.
Expanded educational opportunites at home, including this campus, the result of a partnership with the State U. 
of New York, have contributed to a decrease in the number of South Korean students in the United States. Photo by Jaewon Lee

Each fall, thousands and thousands of students from one East Asian country arrive on American campuses.

They come from a culture that views education as key to success, where mothers and fathers save to send their only children overseas. On top of tuition, parents shell out for test prep and cram schools, supplemental English lessons, and recruitment agents to shepherd them through an unfamiliar admissions process. Once only a small elite pursued advanced degrees internationally; today many sons and daughters of the nation’s emergent middle class go abroad.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Each fall, thousands and thousands of students from one East Asian country arrive on American campuses.

They come from a culture that views education as key to success, where mothers and fathers save to send their only children overseas. On top of tuition, parents shell out for test prep and cram schools, supplemental English lessons, and recruitment agents to shepherd them through an unfamiliar admissions process. Once only a small elite pursued advanced degrees internationally; today many sons and daughters of the nation’s emergent middle class go abroad.

The country in question? It is tempting to guess China. In fact, it’s South Korea.

But after years of robust, even double-digit, enrollment increases, there are troubling signs. Graduate applications from Korea to American colleges have fallen off. Last year the number of Korean undergraduates in the United States dropped, too. Fewer South Koreans study in the United States now than five years ago.

Softening interest from the third-largest supplier of international students to the United States is worrisome in its own right. The reversal could also serve as a warning to American institutions that have grown reliant on tuition revenue from the largest source, China—an admonition not to assume that its numbers, too, will continue to go in only one direction, up.

To be sure, China and Korea have marked differences in politics, population, and economics. But they share common educational traditions and motivations for sending their students abroad, and their international-mobility patterns have followed corresponding trajectories.

“The Chinese market,” says Jekook Woo, an education consultant based in Seoul, “is very much like Korea 10 years ago.”

Add to the similarities: Recent hand-wringing in China about the return on a pricey foreign degree echoes qualms among Korean families that overseas study is no longer the guarantee of economic security it once was.

In international education, could a cooling Korea be the canary in the coal mine? Is it a harbinger, a window into a future when the China wave, too, has crested?

Changing Motivations

For decades, sending top students overseas was pragmatic choice for both countries, a recognition of the lack of educational capacity at home, particularly at the graduate level. But as the countries’ economies and educational systems changed, so did the reasons for going abroad.

ADVERTISEMENT

Growing affluence—beginning in the 1990s in South Korea and within the past decade in China—meant that more families could afford an American education. In both countries, parents bet that a foreign degree could help their children stand out in an increasingly global and crowded job market. Many Korean businesses, in fact, require prospective hires to submit English-proficiency scores.

Academe Today

Keep up with all that’s happening in higher education with a free Chronicle report, emailed to you every weekday morning.

The decision to go abroad may also reflect a desire to opt out of rigid, highly competitive educational systems. Performance on the gaokao, China’s national college-entrance exam, and its Korean equivalent, the suneung, are the sole determinants of college admission.

Perhaps as a result, students from the two countries are heading overseas at earlier ages. Twice as many Korean students go to the United States now for undergraduate study as for graduate-level work, according to the Institute of International Education. Over the past decade, the number of Chinese undergrads at American colleges has grown by nearly 900 percent.

Saturating the Market

But the very popularity of studying overseas may be undercutting its appeal. Nearly 240,000 Korean students went abroad last year, equal to roughly 7 percent of the college population. About one-third of that number was in the United States. With such a large share of students overseas, any edge that a foreign degree gives a Korean graduate could be blunted.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Maybe,” says Vincent Flores, an education adviser with the Fulbright Commission in Seoul, “the novelty of studying in America has worn off.”

While the share of China’s college-age population going abroad remains small, in the United States, one in every three foreign students is Chinese. Jordan Dotson advises students in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen and has written a book for Chinese families about the American college-application process. Some U.S. colleges are so well known for their large Chinese enrollments, he says, that they’ve spawned a local punchline: “If you want to improve your Chinese, go to America, because you’ll have many, many classmates from Beijing.”

“It’s a joke,” he says, “and it’s a real problem.”

If the surfeit of Chinese students at certain institutions risks turning some students off, others may be discouraged by the difficulty of getting into elite American colleges, despite excellent grades and test scores. To put it in perspective, this year some 150 students from a single top Shenzhen high school competed for admission to a handful of select American colleges. That’s nearly equal to the number of international students, total, in Harvard’s freshman class.

ADVERTISEMENT

If “stone-cold rejected” by leading American colleges, Mr. Dotson’s students will attend highly ranked institutions outside the United States, including the Universities of Hong Kong and Toronto, and Yale-NUS College in Singapore. Next year, he fears, their younger classmates might not even bother applying to America. “The top kids understand that it’s tougher for them to get into U.S. universities,” he says. “It’s insanely competitive.”

Sea Turtles and Seaweed

But if getting into college is competitive, so, too, is the job market awaiting graduates in both countries.

In South Korea, the employment rate for college graduates has fallen to just 60 percent in a shaky economy. Those who complete vocational programs actually have better job placement. For China, it’s a numbers game: With seven million graduates, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences put the unemployment rate for the class of 2013 at nearly 18 percent.

A foreign degree was supposed to benefit job seekers in a tight market, but it’s not clear that’s happening in either country. In fact, it might even be a disadvantage.

ADVERTISEMENT

Returning students often find that they lack the connections important to land a job, says Jaeha Choi, who has worked in international recruitment in the United States and Canada. Despite the growing numbers of international students, most career-services offices at American institutions are focused on placing students closer to home.

“In Korea, kinship is important. It’s a very relational society,” says Mr. Choi, director of student recruitment and admissions at the State University of New York’s campus outside Seoul. “You have to have a good network in your school to get a job. Those students who study in the States don’t.”

The first of the surge of Chinese undergraduates at American colleges are only now beginning to return home. But a study of earlier Chinese returnees working in venture capital found that they were actually less successful than their counterparts who had remained at home, a finding that the author, Wei Sun, a research fellow at the National University of Singapore, attributes to a possible mismatch in skills and weaker social networks.

And a survey last year by Zhilian Zhaopin, a Chinese recruitment firm, found that 70 percent of employers would give no hiring preference to overseas-educated applicants; nearly 10 percent said they would prefer not to hire them.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Chinese have a name for those who return home after studying or working abroad. Haigui, or sea turtles, are those with one foot in the homeland, another overseas. But now a new term is catching on for those who have gone abroad: haidai, or seaweed, floating between two countries and cultures, unable to anchor in either.

A Matter of When

Of course, not all the reasons behind the declining interest in study abroad are negative. One important factor: Educational opportunities once obtainable only overseas are now more readily available at home.

The South Korean government has emphasized improving English-language instruction in the schools, and many Korean universities are offering classes taught in English.

Both Korea and China have a growing number of joint partnerships with international universities, like Mr. Choi’s employer, SUNY-Korea, that allow students to earn foreign degrees without the expense of going abroad. Educational exchanges have also picked up between the two countries, giving students an international experience while remaining in the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

Each country has also invested heavily in research, spending big on top-notch laboratories and world-class faculty. It’s probably no coincidence that the initial slides have happened in graduate study: The number of Korean graduate students in the United States has been dropping since 2010, and the Council of Graduate Schools recently reported that graduate applications from China are down for the second year in a row.

Korean universities have historically preferred to hire faculty members with degrees from abroad, says Jae-Eun Jon, of the Higher Education Policy Research Institute at Korea University, but that’s changing. As a consequence, particularly in science and engineering, “top students really debate between Korea and the United States for graduate school,” she says.

Some of the factors influencing study-abroad trends are beyond anyone’s control. Korea’s economy took a body blow in the recent economic downturn. It also has the world’s lowest birthrate; by next year, it could have more available slots at its universities than students. In China, thanks to the government’s one-child policy, by 2030 there will be 60 percent fewer 20-to-24-year-olds than in 2010.

For American colleges, any changes in Korea and China may not be an immediate problem. Declines in enrollment from Korea are often compensated for with students from China or elsewhere. And many observers don’t expect Chinese enrollments to crater any time soon, leaving that important revenue stream intact for the time being. There are still too few places at Chinese universities to meet demand. The number of programs and schools designed to prepare Chinese students to go abroad seems to keep on expanding.

ADVERTISEMENT

Indeed, research by Peter G. Ghazarian, a professor of education at Keimyung University, in Korea, suggests that there may actually be untapped demand for an American education in both China and Korea. In surveys, he found, more students list the United States as their destination of choice than actually study there.

Still, few people expect Korea to return to the strong growth it enjoyed in the middle of the past decade. And many believe that it’s not a matter of whether Chinese enrollments hit a speed bump, but when.

“It happened in Korea, it will happen in China,” says Parke Muth, a former director of international admissions at the University of Virginia, who now works as a consultant. “It’s not that the end is near. But there are changes ahead.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
International
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Fischer_Karin.jpg
About the Author
Karin Fischer
Karin Fischer writes about international education and the economic, cultural, and political divides around American colleges. She’s on the social-media platform X @karinfischer, and her email address is karin.fischer@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin