> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Medical Education
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Efforts to Assign More Doctor-Training Slots to Shortage Areas Have Failed, Study Finds

By  Katherine Mangan
January 7, 2013

Recent efforts to redistribute doctor-training slots from specialty areas to primary care and rural health have failed, according to a new study that raises doubts about whether a similar shift will succeed under the nation’s 2010 health-care overhaul.

The study, described in an article published on Monday in the journal Health Affairs, examined the outcome of a 2003 law that was supposed to shift nearly 3,000 residency positions into rural settings and primary-care slots. Both areas suffer severe shortages, in part because heavily indebted medical-school graduates can earn much more as specialists.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Recent efforts to redistribute doctor-training slots from specialty areas to primary care and rural health have failed, according to a new study that raises doubts about whether a similar shift will succeed under the nation’s 2010 health-care overhaul.

The study, described in an article published on Monday in the journal Health Affairs, examined the outcome of a 2003 law that was supposed to shift nearly 3,000 residency positions into rural settings and primary-care slots. Both areas suffer severe shortages, in part because heavily indebted medical-school graduates can earn much more as specialists.

Despite the intent of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, only 12 of the 304 hospitals that received the extra residency slots were in rural locations, and they received just 3 percent of the additional positions, according to the article, by Candice Chen, an assistant research professor at George Washington University’s School of Public Health and Health Services, and colleagues.

Many of the hospitals used the money that was intended for shortage areas to create new training positions for specialists, Dr. Chen found.

“Some hospitals even converted primary-care positions to specialty positions after receiving newly redistributed positions,” the report says.

ADVERTISEMENT

The number of residency training slots supported with federal funds has been capped since 1997. That has led to concerns that the growing number of medical-school graduates will face a bottleneck that will exacerbate physician shortages, especially in primary-care fields.

Some hospitals have unfilled positions, however, and both the 2003 and 2010 health-care laws called for those to be gathered up and redistributed to shortage areas.

But according to Dr. Chen, hospitals face “a snowball of incentives” to shift the money into even more specialty slots. Residents in fields like interventional cardiology can perform high-priced procedures that generate more money. And rural clinics that operate on slim margins may not have the time or resources to develop a training position that will meet accreditation requirements, she said in an interview.

Unless residency programs are held accountable for training residents to serve in shortage areas, the same thing is likely to occur under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, she said, adding that the federal government pays hospitals nearly $13-billion each year for residency training.

The 2010 law, which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in June, has a number of provisions designed to increase the number of doctors in primary care and rural medicine.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a good start to say these areas are important,” Dr. Chen said, “but we need to have a way to ensure that the training ends up where it’s supposed to.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Katherine Mangan
Katherine Mangan writes about community colleges, completion efforts, student success, and job training, as well as free speech and other topics in daily news. Follow her on Twitter @KatherineMangan, or email her at katherine.mangan@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin