Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
Admissions

Elite-College Admissions Has an Image Problem. Would Ending Legacy Admissions Help?

By Nell Gluckman January 30, 2020
A quad at the Johns Hopkins U., which made waves recently by saying it had quietly ceased giving legacy preferences.
A quad at the Johns Hopkins U., which made waves recently by saying it had quietly ceased giving legacy preferences.Patrick Semansky, AP Images

Selective admissions is in crisis.

That was the message conveyed by organizers of an admissions conference in Los Angeles this week. It was the first time the conference, hosted by the University of Southern California’s Center for Enrollment Research, Policy, and Practice, had convened since the Varsity Blues scandal erupted last March — adding celebrity gossip, a master schemer, and stories about rich people gaming the system to our collective understanding of selective admissions. At USC, an athletics administrator and several coaches were indicted.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Selective admissions is in crisis.

That was the message conveyed by organizers of an admissions conference in Los Angeles this week. It was the first time the conference, hosted by the University of Southern California’s Center for Enrollment Research, Policy, and Practice, had convened since the Varsity Blues scandal erupted last March — adding celebrity gossip, a master schemer, and stories about rich people gaming the system to our collective understanding of selective admissions. At USC, an athletics administrator and several coaches were indicted.

The scandal seemed to confirm the suspicions of many that the admissions system is rigged to the advantage of families that are already privileged. But those suspicions have always been there.

“Long before the scandal hit, years before Harvard was sued for its affirmative-action admissions policy,” and even before the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1978 Bakke decision, Robert J. Massa, a longtime admissions leader, said, “colleges and universities favored students of privilege.”

One of the most prominent — and, in some circles, loathed — ways institutions do that is through legacy preferences, giving the children of alumni an edge in admissions. This month, the Johns Hopkins University disclosed that over the past decade or so it had stopped legacy admissions entirely, and taken other steps to help diversify its student body.

“This is about building our student-affairs resources,” said David Phillips, whose role as vice provost for admissions and financial aid has coincided with the end of legacy preferences. “In admissions and financial aid,” he said, “it’s about learning how to recruit high-achieving students from different backgrounds and understanding what high achievement looks like in different backgrounds.”

Over the last decade, the university has seen some results. In 2019, 15.1 percent of its incoming class were in the first generation of their families to go to college and 32.5 percent were students who identify as black, African American, Hispanic, Native American, Native Alaskan, or Pacific Islander, according to data provided to The Chronicle by Hopkins. Compare that with 10 years earlier, when 7.1 percent of the incoming class were first-generation students and 13.9 percent were underrepresented-minority students.

“In this move to diversify our class, we’ve also raised the bar on the level of students we have at Hopkins,” Phillips said. “Too often there can be a sentiment that somehow diversity and excellence are opposed. Nothing could be further from the truth.”

The end of legacy admissions is not the only factor that changed in the university’s demographics. In fact, one of the most salient critiques of ending legacy admissions as a solution is that it won’t actually solve very much. Taking away the extra point in their favor wouldn’t change the fact that children of selective colleges’ alumni probably have more resources — wealthy school districts, tutoring, and private counselors — that maximize their chances of admission. Tweaking just one dial wouldn’t open the gates to the less advantaged.

But one reason to do it, Hopkins administrators said, is for the signal it sends to the public.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a piece of broader messaging to say, We value students from many different backgrounds,” Phillips said. “It’s one important way to get the message out that gives credence to that concept.”

It’s not clear that prospective students pay attention to whether colleges give preferences to legacy applicants, according to Sara Urquidez, executive director of the Academic Success Program, a nonprofit group in Dallas that provides college advisers to public high schools.

“Truthfully I don’t think that’s something that hits our students’ radar that often,” she said. But the people at whom it might be directed, she said, are college counselors who help students through the process.

There is something, though, that Urquidez’s students do pay close attention to — a factor that directly affects their perceptions of higher education and the admissions process:

“They’re concerned about paying for college.”

A version of this article appeared in the February 14, 2020, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Innovation & Transformation First-Generation Students
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gluckman_Nell.jpg
About the Author
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin