Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Admissions

Elite Colleges Explore Alternative to Common App

By Eric Hoover October 31, 2014

Admissions officials at some of the nation’s most-selective colleges seek to create a new online application system, according to documents obtained by The Chronicle. Although the platform would rival the Common Application, its members apparently would include only private colleges with robust financial-aid budgets, and public institutions with high graduation rates.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Admissions officials at some of the nation’s most-selective colleges seek to create a new online application system, according to documents obtained by The Chronicle. Although the platform would rival the Common Application, its members apparently would include only private colleges with robust financial-aid budgets, and public institutions with high graduation rates.

Earlier this year, an “exploratory committee” comprising representatives of Harvard, Princeton, and Yale Universities, among several other institutions, sent out a request for proposals describing their interest in “an application solution to ensure that students can apply when another application mode experiences difficulties or system failure,” according to a May 12 draft of the RFP. “There is also interest,” the document says, “in establishing a new collaborative option for individual higher-education institutions as they work in their own ways to enroll the very best and most diverse freshman classes they can.” If built, the system could go live as early as next year.

The plans mark the latest chapter in the unfolding saga of the Common App, which was plagued by various technical difficulties at the height of last year’s admissions cycle. Following months of glitches, admissions leaders at colleges that had used the Common App exclusively said they worried about placing all of their eggs in one basket.

About a year ago, some admissions officials at colleges within the Consortium on Financing Higher Education, known as Cofhe, first discussed the possibility of starting a shared application system of their own, according to two deans who participated in the discussions. “There is a large sense that the Common App dominates the world, and the thought is, Wouldn’t it be good to have a fall-back option?” one of the deans said. “Nobody’s talking about this as a replacement, but as an additional option.”

The group, according to both officials, has weighed questions about which institutions should participate in such a platform. Initially, the deans recalled, there was interest in inviting only private institutions that meet the full financial need of accepted students. Later, the group decided to seek support from a more-diverse array of institutions, including some public colleges.

An April 20 document sent to the exploratory committee by members of the “Communications/Messaging Workgroup” includes the following recommendation: “Reach out to non-Cofhe schools ASAP since including a broader mix of schools will be critical in supporting our messaging and avoid any appearance of elitism.”

Eventually, a group of colleges, calling themselves the “Coalition,” settled on a vision for a new application system. Potential users, according to the RFP, would include interested members of the consortium, the Association of American Universities, and the Annapolis Group, which represents more than 100 liberal-arts colleges.

Private colleges, the document says, would “meet the full demonstrated financial need of admitted (domestic) first-year students.” Public colleges would “have in-state tuitions that make attendance possible for large numbers of students.” And all participating institutions would have “strong” graduation rates and “low loan-default rates” for undergraduate students.

Some passages in the RFP seem to convey longstanding frustrations with the Common Application, which has long had an array of membership requirements. Some of those rules have governed what colleges can say on their own websites, and what they may require of applicants. (Recently, the Common Application relaxed its membership requirements.)

The alternative application system, the document says, “will allow institutional autonomy with respect to selection policy and processes, and will maximize local oversight of individual items on members’ customized components of the application.”

ADVERTISEMENT

At a breakfast meeting this week during the College Board’s annual conference, in Las Vegas, several representatives of institutions in the consortium discussed the plan further. Two deans who attended the gathering said they were told that a committee had settled on three potential vendors to build the system.

Several deans who are pushing the idea could not be reached for comment on Thursday. James G. Nondorf, dean of college admissions and financial aid at the University of Chicago, whom several sources said had initiated the plan, did not immediately respond to an email from The Chronicle late Thursday.

A dean at one institution that plans to participate in the system said he likes the Common Application, which is used by more than 500 colleges worldwide. But he described it as “kind of a diluted brand.” A smaller consortium of high-profile public and private colleges, he said, might better serve colleges and students alike.

How, exactly, another application option might help students is unclear, however. Those behind the idea, the RFP says, seek to ensure that it will not make the application process harder for “under-resourced, unsophisticated students,” and that the new platform could make it easier for them to understand, apply for, and receive need-based financial aid.

But some college counselors who had heard about the plan were skeptical. “For kids who don’t have any counseling, I think this is more confusing,” said Anne Ferguson, senior associate director of college counseling at Phillips Academy, in Andover, Mass. “I just don’t see how this helps the low-income, first-gen kids, or how flooding the market with more apps is going to help the kid in rural Montana without good counseling.”

Read other items in A New Approach to College Admissions.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Hoover
About the Author
Eric Hoover
Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury
FILE -- University of Michigan President Santa Ono speaks during a Board of Regents meeting in Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 5, 2024. The University of Florida's new president will be Ono, a biomedical researcher lured from the top job at the University of Michigan with a large pay package, despite criticism of him that social conservatives raised.
The Review | Opinion
The Ruination of Santa Ono
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin