Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
News

Elsevier Experiments With Allowing ‘Text Mining’ of Its Journals

By Jennifer Howard May 6, 2012
Heather Piwowar, of the U. of British Columbia, helped negotiate the deal.
Heather Piwowar, of the U. of British Columbia, helped negotiate the deal.Courtesy of Heather Piwowar

High-profile scholarly boycotts aren’t the only way to get a big publisher’s attention. Sometimes all it takes is a tweet.

Not long ago, Heather A. Piwowar, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of British Columbia, found herself on the phone with six high-level employees of the science-publishing giant Elsevier. Ms. Piwowar studies patterns in the sharing and reuse of research data. (Her Twitter handle is @researchremix.) Her work depends on text mining, using computers to automatically pull certain kinds of information from large amounts of text, including databases of journal articles. Many of those are subscription-based, and can be hard to get access to.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

High-profile scholarly boycotts aren’t the only way to get a big publisher’s attention. Sometimes all it takes is a tweet.

Not long ago, Heather A. Piwowar, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of British Columbia, found herself on the phone with six high-level employees of the science-publishing giant Elsevier. Ms. Piwowar studies patterns in the sharing and reuse of research data. (Her Twitter handle is @researchremix.) Her work depends on text mining, using computers to automatically pull certain kinds of information from large amounts of text, including databases of journal articles. Many of those are subscription-based, and can be hard to get access to.

The chat with Elsevier came about because Ms. Piwowar had complained on Twitter about how little Elsevier content was openly available to text mine. Alicia Wise (@wisealic), the publisher’s director of universal access, responded, saying that Elsevier content could be text-mined, which led to the phone talk and negotiations by e-mail, and eventually to an agreement between Ms. Piwowar’s university and the publisher that will allow UBC researchers to dig into Elsevier content for research purposes.

“I was going about my research assuming I couldn’t get access to this stuff,” Ms. Piwowar says.

Elsevier could use some good PR right now. In some quarters, the publisher has become the Great Satan of scholarly communication because of what critics see as price gouging and attempts to quash “the free exchange of information.” More than 11,000 researchers, including Ms. Piwowar, have pledged that they will not review for or contribute to its journals.

Ms. Piwowar is cheerfully frank about what she thinks Elsevier stands to gain from working with her. She’s plugged into an active network of researchers who push for open access to data, and experiment with new ways to track and measure research activity. Many of them are skeptical, to put it mildly, about the constraints of commercial scholarly publishing. “I think I have the ear of some people in social media, and by making me happy and by clearly trying hard, they’re sending a message that’s different than the message that’s otherwise going around about Elsevier these days,” she says. “Clearly they’re using me, but that’s OK. I still think it can be a win-win-win-win.”

Librarians often can’t talk about their dealings with publishers because of nondisclosure agreements. Unconstrained, Ms. Piwowar has made it a point to be as open as possible about the Elsevier negotiations, chronicling the process step by step on her blog.

She’s had positive reactions from colleagues, including some who have signed on to the boycott petition. “They’ve acknowledged that this is a positive by Elsevier, and that Elsevier’s one of the more active participants in this space right now, and that other publishers are lagging,” she says.

At least one prominent advocate of text-mining rights, though, doesn’t love the UBC-Elsevier arrangement: Peter Murray-Rust, a professor of chemistry at the University of Cambridge. “The rigmarole that Elsevier put Heather Piwowar through with UBC librarians is out of order, and in any case doesn’t scale across publishers, libraries, or researchers,” he wrote in a May 1 blog post titled “Towards a Manifesto on Open Mining of Scholarship.”

Mr. Murray-Rust convened a Skype meeting of researchers, including Ms. Piwowar, last week to discuss what a manifesto should say. In his May 1 post, he argued that restrictions on text mining stifle opportunity for new kinds of research, waste time by forcing researchers to chase after permissions or to enter into complicated negotiations with publishers, and lead to bad science and bad policy decisions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“His opinion is that negotiating with Elsevier and other publishers is the wrong approach, and that we have these rights to use the material in a responsible way,” Ms. Piwowar says. She’s pragmatic about the UBC deal. “I don’t think this is the best way or the long-term way or the most scalable way, but if Elsevier unexpectedly wants to offer me access, let’s see how that works, and let’s use that to get access for UBC from other publishers, and for other universities.”

Looking for a Model

Elsevier’s representatives say the boycott didn’t motivate their invitation to Ms. Piwowar. “This is just good practice in interacting with the academic community,” says Ms. Wise. “We’re constantly evolving our products and services, and of course are wanting to keep pace with changes in scholarly behavior.”

The deal seems to be playing well with librarians at the University of British Columbia, who have been closely involved in the conversations. “I’m thrilled to see Elsevier doing this.” says Lea Starr, associate university librarian for research services. “It shows that they are listening.”

For the library, negotiating a text-mining agreement was unexplored territory. Teresa Lee, the university’s e-resource and access librarian, reviews contracts for UBC’s digital subscriptions. It’s unusual, and exciting, she says, to have a researcher so directly involved in library negotiations. She also sees this as a chance for the library to set a good precedent as it works out the details with Elsevier. “I think what we should look toward is crafting a model agreement that we could then turn around and use with other publishers,” Ms. Lee says.

The agreement with UBC could be a useful experiment for Elsevier as well. Ms. Wise says it’s eager to learn more about what researchers want out of text mining, and how that varies from discipline to discipline. I asked her what could derail the agreement from the publisher’s point of view. She didn’t sound worried about the security of Elsevier content, pointing out that the publisher is able to tell “legitimate mining activities from not-so-legitimate ones.” But Elsevier will be keeping an eye on “load and traffic on our servers,” she said. “We want to be mindful to provide a good reading experience for machine-to-machine users but also our human users.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Technology
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Jennifer Howard
Jennifer Howard, who began writing for The Chronicle in 2005, covered publishing, scholarly communication, libraries, archives, digital humanities, humanities research, and technology.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing two professors outside a university building sunk down in a large canyon, looking up at an unreachable outside world above them.
Stagnant pay
Professors Say They Need a Raise. They Probably Won’t Get One.
Photo-based illustration depicting a basketball scene with a hand palming a quarter, another hand of a man wearing a suit sleeve, and a basketball goal made from a $100 bill and the Capitol building.
Sports shakeup
A New Normal Looms in College Athletics. Can Trump Help Shape It?
Illustration showing three classical columns on stacks of coins, at different heights due to the amount of coins stacked underneath
Data
These 35 Colleges Could Take a Financial Hit Under Republicans’ Expanded Endowment Tax
Illustration showing details of a U.S. EEOC letter to Harvard U.
Bias Allegations
Faculty Hiring Is Under Federal Scrutiny at Harvard

From The Review

Solomon-0512 B.jpg
The Review | Essay
The Conscience of a Campus Conservative
By Daniel J. Solomon
Illustration depicting a pendulum with a red ball featuring a portion of President Trump's face to the left about to strike balls showing a group of protesters.
The Review | Opinion
Trump Is Destroying DEI With the Same Tools That Built It
By Noliwe M. Rooks
Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin