Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Trump Webinar Series
    Mental Health Forum
    Using Big Data to Improve Social Mobility
Sign In
The Review

Empathy, Schmempathy

Paul Bloom on why we should feel less

By Tom Bartlett November 27, 2016
Paul Bloom
Paul BloomTania, A3/Contrasto, Redux

No one argues in favor of empathy. That’s because no one needs to: Empathy is an unalloyed good, like sunshine or cake or free valet parking. Instead we bemoan lack of empathy and nod our heads at the notion that, if only we could feel the pain of our fellow man, then everything would be OK and humanity could, at long last, join hands together in song.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

No one argues in favor of empathy. That’s because no one needs to: Empathy is an unalloyed good, like sunshine or cake or free valet parking. Instead we bemoan lack of empathy and nod our heads at the notion that, if only we could feel the pain of our fellow man, then everything would be OK and humanity could, at long last, join hands together in song.

Bah, says Paul Bloom. In his new book, Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion (Ecco), Bloom argues that when it comes to helping one another, our emotions too often spoil everything. Instead of leading us to make smart decisions about how best to use our limited resources altruistically, they cause us to focus on what makes us feel good in the moment. We worry about the boy stuck in the well rather than the thousands of boys dying of malnutrition every day.

Bloom, a professor of psychology at Yale University, calls on us to feel less and think more.

Can you explain the difference between empathy and compassion?

If you want to be a moral person, empathy is the wrong way to do it.

Empathy is putting yourself in someone else’s shoes, feeling what they feel, their sadness or their rage and being drawn to that. Compassion is caring for people, being concerned about them, but not feeling their pain. Just loving them. There’s evidence that it’s entirely possible to help people and to do so cheerfully and positively without any sort of vicarious suffering. You can’t do it entirely rationally, you need some sort of emotion, but I suggest that it’s compassion that does the trick, not empathy.

Tell me about the reactions you get when people hear you’re against empathy.

People assume if I’m against empathy I must be some kind of psychopath. I explain that I’m against empathy in a very specific sense. My argument is that if you want to be a moral person, empathy is the wrong way to do it.

You write that empathy is not all bad and can be used to motivate people to do the right thing in certain situations. So should there be an asterisk next to your provocative title?

I don’t doubt for a minute that empathy can do good things. My claim is that, on balance, it’s bad for us. If I wrote a book called Against Racism, people wouldn’t demand that asterisk, even though racist sentiments could be exploited for all sorts of good things. Imagine there are two political candidates and one of them is a wonderful person, the other is totally awful, and imagine you use racist sentiments to get people to vote for the good guy. In the end, that wouldn’t persuade you to be pro-racism.

ADVERTISEMENT

During this past election season, there have been pieces written about whether liberals don’t empathize enough with the white working class, or conservatives with Syrian refugees. I suppose you don’t think more empathy is the answer in either case.

I’ve always been tempted to write an article called “Donald Trump, Empath?” because he exploited empathy extremely skillfully throughout the election. And he used empathy for people who were murdered by undocumented immigrants and people who lost their jobs. Liberals often think that empathy is on their side. But empathy is a tool used by everybody.

Have you changed anything specific in your life as a result of thinking through these issues?

I’ve started to give more to charity and to think harder about where I give. I try not to do it in an emotional rush, but to think about what could provide the most help. I’ve learned that I should distrust my emotional reactions. In some way, the book has been self-therapy because I think I’m overly empathic, and I’ve made some bad choices due to empathy.

This interview has been edited and condensed.

A version of this article appeared in the December 2, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Tom Bartlett
Tom Bartlett is a senior writer who covers science and ideas. Follow him on Twitter @tebartl.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Paul Bloom: Free Will Does Not Exist. So What?
The Evolution of Altruism
The Pleasures of Imagination

More News

Photo-based illustration of a Sonoma State University clock structure that's fallen into a hole in a $100 bill.
Campus Crossroads
Sonoma State U. Is Making Big Cuts to Close a Budget Hole. What Will Be Left?
Illustration showing three classical columns on stacks of coins, at different heights due to the amount of coins stacked underneath
Data
These 32 Colleges Could Take a Financial Hit Under Republicans’ Expanded Endowment Tax
Conti-0127
Finance
Here’s What Republicans’ Proposed College-Endowment Tax Could Look Like
Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
The Fine Print
The NIH Is Requiring Grantees to Follow Trump’s Anti-Trans Executive Order

From The Review

Illustration depicting a pendulum with a red ball featuring a portion of President Trump's face to the left about to strike balls showing a group of protesters.
The Review | Opinion
Trump Is Destroying DEI With the Same Tools That Built It
By Noliwe M. Rooks
Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune
University of British Columbia president and vice-chancellor Santa Ono pauses while speaking during a memorandum of understanding  signing ceremony between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and UBC, in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Dec. 8, 2021.
The Review | Opinion
Santa Ono Flees for Florida
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_USF_AIWorkForce_VF.png
New Academic Programs for an AI-Driven Work Force
Cincy_Plain.png
Hands-On Career Preparation
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin