Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
News

Engaging Students Requires a Renewed Focus on Teaching

Faculty-reward structures still value research over pedagogy

By Russell A. Berman September 15, 2014
Engaging Students  Requires a Renewed  Focus on Teaching 1
David Plunkert for The Chronicle

Promoting successful student learners requires faculty members to reflect on their own roles as teachers. But while tenured and tenure-track professors routinely share their research interests with one another, frank discussions about teaching remain rare.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Promoting successful student learners requires faculty members to reflect on their own roles as teachers. But while tenured and tenure-track professors routinely share their research interests with one another, frank discussions about teaching remain rare.

Relevant and vibrant pedagogical discussions are well established in some fields, such as digital pedagogy and rhetoric and composition, since both are significantly engaged in undergraduate teaching. And because their assessment is heavily dependent on classroom success, adjunct instructors have a material interest in the quality of their teaching. While many colleagues do pay more attention to teaching today than in past decades, faculty-reward structures still frequently rank research over teaching. If we want to help more students succeed academically, colleges need to adopt more student-centered instructional practices, requiring a significant shift in academic culture.

Some of these shifts have played out in the transformation of the general-education program at Stanford University, where I am a faculty member. In the past, required freshman courses transmitted specific, traditionally canonic material. Today there is a much clearer recognition that first-year students require particular pedagogies to ease their transition into college. Instead of designing courses in terms of field coverage, faculty members are asked to develop lectures specifically for the learning needs of new students and provide scaffolding that enables growth in fundamental academic skills. Meanwhile, term lecturers who lead discussion sections in these courses are available to offer students individualized attention.


NEXT: The Quest for Student Success

Read the full report on innovation in academe, focused on formulas for student success.


The lecture sessions are relatively small, with as few as 40 and no more than 120 students, and discussion sections are capped at 15. The courses address fundamental questions or major problems and are drawn from across the whole university: “Rules of War,” “Bioethical Challenges of New Technology,” “Inventing Government, Ancient and Modern,” “What Is Love?” These diverse courses pursue common learning goals, equipping students with the ability to ask good questions, participate in discussion effectively, and reason critically.

Moving from a teaching model defined in terms of content transmission to a student-centered pedagogy represents a major challenge. It means faculty members must rethink their assumptions about teaching and place student-learning needs at the center of their efforts. In the research-university environment, small faculty gatherings held to discuss teaching and learning issues offer one effective way to help make this transition. When given the opportunity, many professors are actually eager to talk about their teaching, reflecting their genuine dedication to student success.

At stake, however, is more than the improvement of individual courses. In his presidential address to the Modern Language Association in 2008, Gerald Graff bemoaned the “courseocentric” mode of teaching in which faculty members develop their syllabi in isolation from one another: While we may know the titles of the courses our colleagues teach, we often have little idea of what really goes on in their classes, so we cannot structure our own classes in ways that would support longer-term student growth. To do so requires far more collaboration among colleagues, frank discussions, and a clear articulation of the curriculum’s goals.

One small step forward is taking place in Stanford’s Division of Literatures, Cultures and Languages, where individual units have begun to share syllabi for their required core sequences to promote student growth across a series of courses. A German major, for example, must complete three introductory courses: one on literature, the second on history and politics, and the third on philosophy. Faculty members have now begun to coordinate the learning goals so that the series better supports student development through the courses.

A greater focus on student learning has already led to significant changes in Stanford’s introductory physics courses. In light of concerns about student engagement, the department added more interactive, student-centered learning techniques to lectures, discussion sections, and labs. According to Patricia Burchat, the professor who led the effort, “Prior to our revamp of the pedagogy, there was little discussion of how to effectively facilitate learning in the large introductory courses. Now professors, support staff, and teaching assistants engage in discussions and planning on many levels—from weekly meetings within courses to across-course coordination of materials and teaching methods.” Because of such collaborations, the department has been able to respond more nimbly to the challenges of how to best serve the diverse range of student backgrounds, as a growing number of students choose technical majors that require some knowledge of physics.

Talking about teaching as a way to shine a light on student-learning issues is showing up throughout higher education in a wider range of institutions, with new strategies and more consistency. At the University of West Florida, for example, Claudia J. Stanny, director of the University Center for Teaching, Learning and Assessment and an associate professor of psychology, organizes peer mentoring. Professors conduct classroom observations and give one another feedback based on their observations. “When I pair faculty in this program, I encourage pairs from different disciplines so the focus stays on teaching and is less likely to devolve into discussions about specific content,” she says.

Two aspects of this strike me as crucial: the mere fact of getting faculty members to talk with one another about their teaching, and the abstraction involved in matching faculty members from different disciplines, which shifts attention toward teaching effectiveness and away from intradisciplinary debates.

ADVERTISEMENT

Middlesex Community College and the University of Massachusetts at Lowell have been engaging faculty members in discussions about how the curriculum should address exit-level expectations for students. With support from the Lumina Foundation and the Massachusetts Department of Higher Education, discipline-based groups—in contrast to the West Florida model—were convened in fields with high rates of transfer between the two institutions.

The goal was to explore how to enable students to reach learning goals defined by rubrics in quantitative literacy that were developed by the American Association of Colleges and Universities. Discussions were task-oriented, focusing on the effectiveness of particular assignments, while avoiding evaluative judgments on individual instructors. Those involved report that the process has built trust, fostered better collaborative relations, and resulted in a more clearly articulated curriculum.

Yet another example of greater focus on student learning: At Brandeis University, the Schusterman Center for Israeli Studies sponsors a summer institute that brings international scholars together for intensive study of the politics and culture of modern Israel. Modeled on the summer seminars offered by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Brandeis institute invites distinguished experts to address the seminar, but a core mission is pedagogic. Participants are asked to produce syllabi, in their areas of expertise, which they share and discuss with regard to some of the distinct challenges of teaching Israel studies: How to convey the material to students with little background? How to address students who bring strong religious convictions to class? How to cultivate critical thinking in classrooms when students show up with firm allegiances? The institute is remarkable in its combination of first-rate scholarship and in the explicit attention it pays to teaching strategies.

Student learning is also the touchstone of a new course-evaluation form that will soon be used at Stanford. While such evaluations typically measure the popularity of the instructor, the new form emphasizes the quality of learning in the course. Faculty members will enter specific learning goals for each course on the customizable evaluation form, and students will be asked how well the course helped them achieve each of the goals. Moreover, the evaluation results will be reported in ways that not only inform individual faculty members about the success of their courses but, perhaps more important, also promote discussion at the department level about the overall success of the curriculum.

All this attention to teaching does not imply an abandonment of research. However, it does require a shift in academic values toward the importance of demonstrable student learning. That can happen at research institutions only if faculty members in the tenure system—who include many of our most senior academics—become engaged in pedagogy discussions. This surely implies that teaching must be weighted more highly in the tenure process than is currently the case, and it points toward the need for greater emphasis on teacher preparation in graduate programs.

Read other items in NEXT: The Quest for Student Success.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Access & Affordability
Congressional Republicans Want to End Grad PLUS Loans. How Might It Affect Your Campus?
Florida Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, Jr. delivers remarks during the State Board of Education meeting at Winter Park High School, Wednesday, March 27, 2024.
Executive Privilege
In Florida, University Presidents’ Pay Goes Up. Is Politics to Blame?

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin