Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
boeckenstedt-0308-full-bleed.jpg
Stuart Bradford for The Chronicle

Enrollment Managers Are Flying Blind

Almost all the instruments colleges would normally use to predict the fall are broken.

The Review
By Jon Boeckenstedt March 9, 2021

I find myself thinking often about a scene in John Osborne’s 1956 play, Look Back in Anger. Alison says to her father, Colonel Redfern, in reference to her husband, Jimmy, “You’re hurt because everything is changed. Jimmy is hurt because everything is the same. And neither of you can face it. Something’s gone wrong somewhere, hasn’t it?”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I find myself thinking often about a scene in John Osborne’s 1956 play, Look Back in Anger. Alison says to her father, Colonel Redfern, in reference to her husband, Jimmy, “You’re hurt because everything is changed. Jimmy is hurt because everything is the same. And neither of you can face it. Something’s gone wrong somewhere, hasn’t it?”

Barry Blitt for The Chronicle
The Pandemic Year
Fifty-two weeks ago, campuses closed and higher education as we’ve known it came to a halt. Ever since, we’ve been asking two questions: How will the pandemic change higher education? And how many of those changes will stick? Read on.
  • 24 Hours in Higher Ed, One Year Into the Pandemic
  • The Stranded
  • The Scholar With the Skeleton Key
  • ‘Zoom Fatigue,’ Gratitude, and Purring Cats: A Peek at Life During the Pandemic
  • Why Haven’t More Colleges Closed?
  • What We’ve Lost in a Year of Virtual Teaching
  • How Much Has Covid Cost Colleges? $183 Billion

As we all know, this year a lot of things have gone wrong and many more things have changed. But what’s complicating everything is that one thing remains the same amid the chaos around us, and those of us in enrollment management are facing it this spring: the belief that we can predict next fall’s enrollment seven months out as usual.

At this time of year, it’s customary for people in my job to talk to chief financial officers, academic planners, presidents, provosts, deans, boards of trustees, and staff members in campus housing to get a sense of what “the number” will be. This year, the one thing most in demand is clarity: Now that things will return to normal, how close will our enrollment be to normal? Our habits, customs, and practices make this question seem, well, normal.

Unfortunately, what’s changed is almost everything we try to use to predict what fall will look like, and that’s causing a lot of restless nights and a foreboding feeling akin to watching a Hitchcock movie: Everything looks like it should, but there is a sense that something is just not right. It’s a feeling you find yourself unable to explain.

As I talk to colleagues around the country it’s clear we all see it, and like people watching that Hitchcock film, we’re all wondering when the suspense will be broken, or if the plot will suddenly turn in an unexpected direction. For now we can just try to pick up clues.

Harvard is up 57 percent in freshman applications from last year; Colgate has more than doubled its applications; and UCLA and UC Berkeley have both blown past the 100,000-application threshold. The takeaway is that the institutions near the top of the food chain will probably be just fine as always. Even if they don’t nail it the first time, they have long wait lists to fill in gaps in their enrollments.

What I hear, though, from smaller public universities that get less attention (often those with a direction in their name) is that this year’s applicant pools are down, by at least a little, maybe a lot. Private colleges outside of the bragging categories in U.S. News & World Report also appear to be feeling the sting.

Even well-known, large public research universities like my own that seem to be having a very good year in freshman applications have to wonder if maybe those increases are coming from students who have scaled back lofty dreams or who are simply hedging their bets. What if, we wonder, student behavior actually returns to normal after a very abnormal admissions cycle? Do those applications evaporate when it comes time to make a decision in May, when students will have the benefit of some improved glimpse of the future?

All data points in our world are connected, of course, and my peers and I have created perfectly plausible explanations for these trends: The Ivies are up because lots of students with good but not great SAT or ACT scores have been convinced that they have a better shot since standardized entrance exams have been abandoned or postponed; the same logic that causes people to buy two lottery tickets because their chances double might be driving these meteoric application increases. It’s also fair to note that there are always outliers: By my calculation, at least 200 colleges between 2002 and 2019 had at least one year with an application increase of 100 percent or more.

Further, we say, applications are down at colleges that serve first-generation, low-income students because those students are most affected by financial downturns. In an economic crisis, college becomes a luxury some people cannot afford or even envision, and data on Fafsa completion and applications to the Common App seem to validate the disproportionate impact we’ve all sensed for months.

ADVERTISEMENT

We could be wrong, and we might not know the future until it happens. Bringing in a class is like landing a fighter on the deck of an aircraft carrier. At night. On rough seas. But in our case, all the power we push to the engines, all the minor changes to speed and direction, all the adjustments for unpredictable cross winds are made and programmed months before we go on final approach.

Faced with landing that jet, you want a very experienced pilot with great instruments.

Did I mention our instruments are broken? Because they’re broken.

Almost all the things we would normally use to try to predict what fall will look like are gone. For instance, we try to measure affinity for our institutions. If you’re moderately selective, you look at the group collectively to see how many students have visited campus during open-house events, how many spoke to an admissions officer at college fairs, how many showed up at a high-school visit. If you’re highly selective, you may allocate individual slots to students based on those criteria. Those data points are mostly nonexistent this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even academic factors like GPA or class rank, and pseudo-academic factors like the SAT or ACT, are less reliable. Standardized tests, while adding almost nothing to an admissions officer’s ability to predict an individual student’s academic performance in college, did offer some insight into yield rates, because society has long believed in the value of the tests. This belief drove application patterns, it drove expectations, and it drove entitlement via both admissions and net price, as it was also frequently used by colleges in allocating institutional aid and scholarships. As test-optional and test-free admissions take hold, that variable, too, is lost.

Even academic factors like GPA or class rank, and pseudo-academic factors like the SAT or ACT, are less reliable.

The academic performance as measured by course rigor, GPA, and class rank has always been the most predictive of a student’s college success, and while we still have those, they are far less meaningful this year because of different blends of face-to-face, remote, and blended instructional modalities. Even grading scales and approaches over the final three high-school terms of this year’s graduates are hard to decipher: Some districts gave everyone a grade of A; others went to pass/fail; some maintained the status quo; and still others allowed students to choose.

All these factors — important in deciding whom to admit and how many will enroll next fall — are less meaningful this year. There may be downstream effects of this too, in the academic performance of students who are thrown in the deep end of the pool without sufficient high-school preparation. Add the difficulty teachers and counselors must certainly have writing letters of recommendation for students they only know through Zoom and the disruption of students’ out-of-class activities that are important to their emotional and physical well-being, and it’s easy to understand how even admissions decisions — let alone yield projections — are more challenging this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

We know that not every student who is admitted will enroll, of course. The “yield rate” (the percentage of admits who do enroll) determines the size of your class. Your yield is partly based on whom you admit; and how many and whom you admit is based on your projected yield. This is the great paradox of admissions and enrollment management; one variable is always unknowable yet necessary to solve the equation.

Our business deals with the whims of the market and students who move like flocks of starlings at sunset: moving in unison with no discernible cause or prompt. Like Donald Rumsfeld, what scares us the most are the things “we don’t know we don’t know,” as well as the things we see but cannot yet understand.

Clearly, this is an institutional challenge, just as Covid is a national challenge. Getting through it is going to require an appreciation for the complexities that are writ large this year, an abandonment of our comfort with the tried and true, and some trust that we’re all doing the best we can.

A version of this article appeared in the March 19, 2021, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion Admissions & Enrollment
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Jon Boeckenstedt
Jon Boeckenstedt is vice provost for enrollment management at Oregon State University.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin