Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
News

Extra Time on an Exam: Suitable Accommodation or Legal Cheating?

By Ari Trachtenberg September 18, 2016
Extra Time on an Exam: Suitable Accommodation or Legal Cheating? 1
Illustration by Gwenda Kaczor for The Chronicle

Many times throughout my teaching career, I have gotten formal university requests for accommodations of student disabilities. Some requests I would grant to just about any student without a second thought: a hearing interpreter, a distraction-free environment, or temporary audio recordings of lectures. Other requests were unconventional but seemed harmless, such as a student’s request to print exams on blue paper or double-spaced. (I agreed to those requests.) However, the most common requests I receive are for extra time on exams — typically requesting 50 percent more time than that given to other students in the course. It is these last requests that have most taxed my thoughts.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Many times throughout my teaching career, I have gotten formal university requests for accommodations of student disabilities. Some requests I would grant to just about any student without a second thought: a hearing interpreter, a distraction-free environment, or temporary audio recordings of lectures. Other requests were unconventional but seemed harmless, such as a student’s request to print exams on blue paper or double-spaced. (I agreed to those requests.) However, the most common requests I receive are for extra time on exams — typically requesting 50 percent more time than that given to other students in the course. It is these last requests that have most taxed my thoughts.

When I receive a formal letter from the university stating that a student needs a particular kind of accommodation, my options seem stark and grim: Either accept the university’s assessment of accommodation with the support and blessing of the legal department, or challenge the accommodation and risk single-handedly defending my legal interpretation of the Americans With Disabilities Act.

For either choice, the average faculty member has neither means nor training to evaluate the student’s disability — the former because disabilities typically include privileged medical information that the professor has no business knowing, and the latter because faculty members get precious little training in the accommodation of disabilities. The simple choice is thus to rely on one’s institution, perhaps unfairly disadvantaging both students who have disabilities and those who do not. Indeed, though I have extensively discussed my concerns with officials at my university who handle disability issues, they have strongly disagreed with my arguments.

Fall Diversity 16 - Cover
Diversity in Academe: Disability on Campus
This special report examines the challenges that students, academics, and colleges face in dealing with physical disabilities as well as conditions that are less visible.
  • Judge What I Say, Not How I Talk
  • How My Eating Disorder Nearly Killed Me
  • ‘You Have to Be Fearless’
  • How One College Helps Students With Learning Disabilities Find Their Way

My second concern about time-based accommodation is that these requests appear to be independent of context. No one has ever asked me what kind of course I am teaching, what kinds of tasks are required on exams, or what type of material I am covering before making such a request. In many of my courses, for example (I teach computer engineering), a significant amount of exam time may be spent running computer programs, whose computations are not affected by any disability that I know.

Finally, I have yet to find any objective basis for the amount of extra time that is provided. Colleagues in various fields have told me they know of no guidelines to support a specific amount of extra time, and there seems to be little peer-reviewed literature. The extra time provided often appears to be based on the recommendation of an evaluating physician, who is not familiar with how I teach my course, and on commonly accepted standards.

Indeed, in some cases, these commonly accepted standards are similar to the position of the College Board, which administers a variety of national standardized tests, such as the SAT, PSAT, and AP exams. Each year the College Board provides students who have documented disabilities with a variety of accommodations, such as time and a half (or more) on exams, or permission to use a four-function calculator for math sections that do not permit use of a calculator. Approximately 85 percent of all accommodation requests are approved, according to a letter the College Board sent me in response to written queries I sent in June. It seems to me that some of these accommodations can significantly affect performance on exams that are often tightly time-constrained.

In response to my queries, the College Board provided no research evidence for the connection between accommodation and disability. Instead, it assured me that “all requests are reviewed by experts in appropriate fields” and “reviewed annually by a national panel of experts.” The response further said that the College Board would not provide a comparison of accommodated versus non-accommodated students, and that both sets of students are scored on the same scale.

In effect, both the College Board and any colleges that may have similar policies appear to be providing an advantage to some students on rigorously controlled tests without a rigorous foundation for the accommodation. The advantage may be sufficient to offset some disabilities, but it also may not. In either event, there is significant potential for collateral damage from this underresearched policy.

Proper accommodation requires accurate, quantifiable research on the relationship between disabilities and performance.

Students with disabilities who lack the economic or social means to request accommodations (a process that involves documentation and various evaluations) are doubly penalized: once with respect to their classmates who do not have disabilities, and a second time with respect to their more privileged disabled counterparts who secure accommodations. Students without disabilities, on the other hand, are potentially disadvantaged by these accommodations in a manner that is not rigorously and objectively analyzed or understood. It is inappropriate to give an objective test with a clearly delineated grading policy if some students get uncalibrated bonuses.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ultimately, I believe that time extensions re-victimize some of my students with disabilities by setting them up for failure on high-pressure tech interviews and subsequent jobs that do not, and cannot, honor time extensions for deadline-driven work. Subjectively determined extensions may also hurt some students’ self-esteem, since they know that they utilized an adjustment of the playing field to attain their successes.

Proper accommodation of students with disabilities requires accurate, quantifiable research on the relationship between disabilities and performance and on the long-term benefits of various accommodations. Accommodations must be specific to circumstances and transparently published for specific disabilities, just like grading rubrics and curves. It may be convenient for both the college and the student to indiscriminately agree to simple accommodations, such as time extension, for a whole host of disabilities in prima facie compliance with the ADA. However, this dilutes the integrity of the academic process without providing a definable benefit to our students.

Ari Trachtenberg is professor of electrical and computer engineering at Boston University.

A version of this article appeared in the September 23, 2016, issue.
Read other items in Diversity in Academe: Disability on Campus.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Disability & Accessibility
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin