Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Sign In
Research

Faith in Science as a Job Creator Meets a Disruptor

By Paul Basken September 8, 2014
An industrial center in northern Nevada will become the site of a huge new battery factory for Tesla Motors. The company’s choice of Nevada over states that touted the value of having their research universities nearby may give policy makers cause to doubt the argument that investing in education is the surest ticket to economic success in the modern, high-tech world.
An industrial center in northern Nevada will become the site of a huge new battery factory for Tesla Motors. The company’s choice of Nevada over states that touted the value of having their research universities nearby may give policy makers cause to doubt the argument that investing in education is the surest ticket to economic success in the modern, high-tech world.AP

Elon Musk, one of his generation’s greatest entrepreneurial minds, had a fundamental choice last week when deciding where to locate a huge new $5-billion battery factory for his Tesla Motors car company.

Mr. Musk could have chosen a state such as Arizona, where Arizona State University has both a national reputation for innovation and entrepreneurship as well as top scientists and graduates working on battery technology.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Elon Musk, one of his generation’s greatest entrepreneurial minds, had a fundamental choice last week when deciding where to locate a huge new $5-billion battery factory for his Tesla Motors car company.

Mr. Musk could have chosen a state such as Arizona, where Arizona State University has both a national reputation for innovation and entrepreneurship as well as top scientists and graduates working on battery technology.

He also could have stayed at his home base in the San Francisco area, with world-class battery scientists at Stanford University and the University of California at Berkeley.

Or he could have chosen Nevada, which has no research university ranked among the nation’s top 100 or having any particular interest in battery development, but was willing to offer him more than $1-billion in tax breaks.

Mr. Musk chose Nevada, and in doing so the businessman—named this year by CNBC as the nation’s No. 1 economic disruptor for another of his companies—may have poked a hole in what has become an almost unassailable article of faith among research universities and their backers: Investing in education, especially science, is the surest ticket to economic success in the modern, high-tech world.

“What makes that odd,” James K. Woodell, director of innovation and technology policy at the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, said of Tesla’s belief that tax breaks are more important than nearby scientific talent, “is that’s so untrue generally these days.”

Others, however, are less sure that the country’s increasingly technology-centric economy will routinely favor the communities that place their bets on education and science.

Arizona tried hard to sell Mr. Musk on the overriding value of its two big research universities, and failed, said Barry G. Broome, president and chief executive officer of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council.

“A company is always going to manage cost and return on capital first, talent second—and that’s never going to change,” Mr. Broome said. “When you’re investing $5-billion, you’re going to make a cost decision first.”

Tesla, the world’s leading maker of electric vehicles, ended several months of negotiations involving at least five states by announcing on Thursday its choice of a site near Reno, Nev., for a battery-production facility that’s expected to cost the company $4-billion to $5-billion, cover 500 to 1,000 acres, and employ some 6,500 people.

Tax Breaks

As part of the package, the governor of Nevada agreed to ask state lawmakers to grant Tesla tax breaks and other incentives worth up to $1.3-billion over 20 years.

ADVERTISEMENT

Much of Mr. Musk’s decision to focus on the tax breaks and other advantages in Nevada—such as more favorable labor and environmental laws—can be explained by the fact that the facility is intended to be far more about churning out huge numbers of batteries than about reinventing them, several technological experts said.

The factory will be largely a site for packaging together battery cells made by Tesla’s Japanese partner Panasonic, said Jay F. Whitacre, an associate professor of materials science and engineering at Carnegie Mellon University who founded Aquion Energy, a maker of advanced battery technologies.

There appears to be “very little interest in innovation at that factory,” Mr. Whitacre said. “That innovation will happen elsewhere or in Japan.”

Nevertheless, battery technology is still rapidly evolving, with energy densities doubling in the last 15 years, said Venkat Viswanathan, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Carnegie Mellon. The types of batteries needed to give electric cars a major share of the American vehicle market “probably haven’t been commercialized yet,” Mr. Viswanathan said.

ADVERTISEMENT

But rather than wait while it tried to push forward the technology, Tesla—with demand so high its cars are back-ordered for months—made a strategic decision to move ahead with its car production by packing some 8,000 lithium-ion battery cells into each vehicle, Mr. Whitacre said. The Reno factory now represents a huge gamble on perpetuating that approach by continuing to use the decades-old lithium technology, he said.

“It’s a crazy idea,” Mr. Whitacre said. “But when you look a little more closely, it’s pretty clever.” The new factory still will require experts in fields such as advanced manufacturing, but perhaps at numbers small enough that the company can recruit them from outside Nevada, he said.

Needed: Engineers

And so, with Tesla apparently content to build a state-of-the-art factory to manufacture batteries that will rely on old technology, communities around the country that are desperate for economic growth might have new reason to doubt whether making major new investments in education is really their surest means of creating lots of new jobs.

“That’s an excellent question,” said Daniel Sperling, a professor of civil engineering and environmental science and policy at the University of California at Davis, and founding director of its Institute of Transportation Studies, who admitted he was surprised to see Tesla had so little interest in a partnership with a research university.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even automated factories need lots of engineers, Mr. Sperling said, citing examples such as the German automaker BMW’s reliance on Clemson University for engineering support at its nearby factory. “Where are they going to get all these people to design and run this thing?” he said.

Arizona State University’s trailblazing president, Michael M. Crow, apparently had the same thought. He and Mr. Broome, along with U.S. Sen. John McCain, met personally with Mr. Musk earlier this year as part of Arizona’s bid to win the giant battery factory.

A central theme in Mr. Crow’s presentation, Mr. Broome said, was the idea that Arizona State could become a major supplier of the 1,500 engineers that Tesla would need for that project. “Elon Musk was really impressed with Arizona State University’s research capabilities,” he said, “and Dr. Crow presented a case on how the university could actually be embedded with Tesla.”

Boosters of New Mexico’s bid made similar suggestions. A group of state and local lawmakers, in an April editorial in The Albuquerque Journal, sketched out a long-term plan for supplying talent to the Tesla factory, beginning with engineering students who could be made available “at little or no cost to the company.”

ADVERTISEMENT

By contrast, the president of the University of Nevada at Reno, Marc A. Johnson, said he was not involved in efforts to attract Tesla. Having a nearby research university seemed to be “a checkbox” for Tesla, Mr. Johnson said, “but the company did not come here solely because of the research capacity here.”

Mr. Johnson conceded that battery-related work is not a particular strength of the University of Nevada at Reno, which with $85.7-million in total research and development spending in 2012 ranked 161st in the country, according to National Science Foundation data.

The University of Arizona at Tucson, Arizona State University in Phoenix, and the University of New Mexico at Albuquerque all rank higher, according to the NSF data. And Texas and California, two other states that vied for the Tesla plant, each have several institutions that perform more research than Nevada.

A Tesla spokesman, Simon Sproule, said the company did commit $1-million to the University of Nevada at Las Vegas—which ranks 228th on the NSF list—to support research projects as part of its investment in the battery factory. But, he acknowledged, “the proximity of universities and research centers was not a principal factor in deciding the final location when looking at the relative weight of all factors.”

An Unusual Example

Mr. Woodell, whose association is among many university groups that have preached the primacy of research in building local economies, said the Tesla decision appeared to be an unusual example. Even most routine manufacturing these days is advanced manufacturing that requires specialized skills, and companies are increasingly turning to outsiders to perform necessary research and development work, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I would hate to kind of use this as some sort of bellwether or harbinger that universities are irrelevant,” Mr. Woodell said.

Mr. Broome said he agrees, to a point. Nevada is an unusual state, he said, with a “very shallow economy” built around gambling and housing. “I’m the governor of Nevada, I do the deal with Tesla,” he said. Some other states with struggling economies might reasonably make the same choice, he said.

But a state like Arizona, which already has two top research universities, could make itself much healthier in the long run by investing $1.3-billion in those universities rather than giving it away as tax breaks, Mr. Broome said. Using that kind of money to help put ASU’s engineering program on a par with that of a national leader like the Georgia Institute of Technology would lead to 10,000 more jobs in 15 years, “and it will be sustainable,” he said.

Tesla’s decision is nevertheless a reminder that even a strong research base doesn’t guarantee that jobs will stick around, said the University of New Mexico’s provost, Chaouki T. Abdallah.

As Tesla and Panasonic are demonstrating, research can be done all around the world, not necessarily at the places where products are made, Mr. Abdallah said. “I don’t think the co-location of the researcher with the manufacturing is critical,” he said.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Paul Basken Bio
About the Author
Paul Basken
Paul Basken was a government policy and science reporter with The Chronicle of Higher Education, where he won an annual National Press Club award for exclusives.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin