> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Student-Success Resource Center
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Federal Court Throws Out Challenge to U. of Texas Admissions Policy

By  Katherine Mangan
August 17, 2009
Austin, Tex.

A federal judge on Monday tossed out a lawsuit filed by two white applicants to the University of Texas at Austin who said they were rejected because of admissions policies that unfairly favored members of minority groups.

Judge Sam Sparks of the U.S. District Court here ruled that the university’s admissions policies were narrowly tailored, especially as they relate to race, and were thus constitutional.

Judge Sparks based his decision on considerations outlined in the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 2003 ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger, which upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race in admissions. “The Texas solicitor general summarized this case best when he stated, ‘If the plaintiffs are right, Grutter is wrong,’” Judge Sparks wrote.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

A federal judge on Monday tossed out a lawsuit filed by two white applicants to the University of Texas at Austin who said they were rejected because of admissions policies that unfairly favored members of minority groups.

Judge Sam Sparks of the U.S. District Court here ruled that the university’s admissions policies were narrowly tailored, especially as they relate to race, and were thus constitutional.

Judge Sparks based his decision on considerations outlined in the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 2003 ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger, which upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race in admissions. “The Texas solicitor general summarized this case best when he stated, ‘If the plaintiffs are right, Grutter is wrong,’” Judge Sparks wrote.

The lawsuit was filed last year by Abigail Noel Fisher, an 18-year-old applicant from Sugar Land, Tex. She was later joined in the suit by another rejected applicant, Rachel M. Michalewicz of Buda, Tex.

The suit argued that the university should not have been considering applicants’ race when it had in place a more-effective, race-neutral approach toward achieving diversity.

ADVERTISEMENT

The lawsuit was backed by the Project on Fair Representation, a Washington-based legal-defense group that opposes affirmative action. The group’s director, Edward J. Blum, said it will appeal the case.

“The real issue that has been laid out for an appeals court is, Can you reintroduce race and ethnicity after a university has shown that a race-neutral admissions procedure can be effective?” he said.

The method he is referring to is a law, in place since 1997, that guarantees Texas applicants who graduate in the top 10 percent of their high-school classes admission to any public university in the state. State lawmakers in May voted to limit the number of students who can be automatically admitted to the Austin campus to 75 percent of an incoming class to give admissions officers more flexibility.

In its 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that colleges may consider race in admissions but must first give “serious, good-faith consideration” to “workable, race-neutral” alternatives to achieving diversity, and that race-conscious policies must be narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest.

Since the Grutter decision, the University of Texas has sought to reintroduce some consideration of race to ensure greater diversity than the 10-percent policy alone achieves.

ADVERTISEMENT

Patricia Ohlendorf, vice president for legal affairs at the Austin campus, said that race is just one factor the university considers as part of a holistic review that also includes test scores, high-school grades, leadership abilities, and evidence of overcoming adversity.

She said in an interview on Monday that the automatic admissions policy hasn’t done enough to achieve diversity at the university. “We have not found that the top-10-percent law and policy in and of itself have been sufficient to achieve a critical mass of minority students.”

Anurima Bhargava, director of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund’s education practice area, said Monday’s ruling demonstrated that the University of Texas’s approach meets the criteria outlined in the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2003 decision.

“The court’s decision was consistent with Grutter v. Bollinger and the principles it espoused, that universities should be able to pursue diversity and consider race as one of many factors,” Ms. Bhargava said.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Law & Policy
Katherine Mangan
Katherine Mangan writes about community colleges, completion efforts, student success, and job training, as well as free speech and other topics in daily news. Follow her on Twitter @KatherineMangan, or email her at katherine.mangan@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
    Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin