Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Research

Few Black, Hispanic, and Native Researchers Are Getting Published

By Chelsea Long April 25, 2022
Illustration by Alex Williamson shows figure overlaid with puzzle pieces, brain images, writing
Alex Williamson for The Chronicle

While it’s widely known that scholars of color are underrepresented in STEM fields, a new study paints an even more troubling picture: Between 2010 and 2020, there was virtually no change in the representation of Black, Hispanic, and Native American researchers among authors of scientific publications.

That’s according to the Institute for Scientific Information, which looked at the authors of research papers in the U.S. in four fields — biochemistry, mathematics, medical research, and computer science — and compared that diversity to census data. The Institute for Scientific Information is an arm of Clarivate, an analytics company that maintains an authoritative database of research citations called Web of Science; the study’s authors used that database to conduct their research.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

While it’s widely known that scholars of color are underrepresented in STEM fields, a new study paints an even more troubling picture: Between 2010 and 2020, there was virtually no change in the representation of Black, Hispanic, and Native American researchers among authors of scientific publications.

That’s according to the Institute for Scientific Information, which looked at the authors of research papers in the U.S. in four fields — biochemistry, mathematics, medical research, and computer science — and compared that diversity to census data. The Institute for Scientific Information is an arm of Clarivate, an analytics company that maintains an authoritative database of research citations called Web of Science; the study’s authors used that database to conduct their research.

According to the study, the majority of published papers in those fields were authored by white scholars. Representation of Asian and Pacific Islander authors increased more than expected over the 10-year period, especially in computer science. But Black, Hispanic, and Native American authorship remained stagnant — and in some cases actually decreased.

“Since scientific publications are the ultimate product of the scientific endeavor, the fact that we have not seen more ethnic diversity in authorship in the past decade should be worrying,” said Gali Halevi, director of the Institute for Scientific Information and a co-author of the study.

The study, Halevi said, stemmed from heightened attention across universities, research institutions, government agencies, and private funders to promote diversity and inclusion in academe.

Although previous research has examined gender diversity among scientific publications, there has been far less information available on ethnic diversity and authorship, Halevi said — especially in STEM, where the largest diversity gaps are found. For this study, the institute used an algorithm to analyze the authors’ last names and determine the likelihood that they came from a certain racial or ethnic background.

While only 5 percent of the U.S. population self-identifies as Asian, Asian researchers represented one-third of authors in computer science. That’s the only field where the representation of nonwhite authors exceeded the representation of white authors, according to the study.

For Black, Hispanic, and Native American scholars, however, publication rates in all four STEM fields remained in the single digits between 2010 and 2020.

In medical research, Black scholars represented about 5.5 percent of authors, a share that held steady — but is less than half of the Black representation in the U.S. population, which is 13 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

In mathematics, the gap between white researchers, at 47 percent, and other groups was larger than in any other field, with Asian authorship at between 15 percent and 19 percent over time, Black authorship at a stagnant 4.6 percent, Hispanic authorship at 3.8 percent, and Native American authorship at a fraction of 1 percent.

In biochemistry, the representation of Hispanic authors actually decreased slightly between 2019 and 2020, from 5.2 percent to 4.8 percent. Hispanic researchers are also significantly underrepresented in publications compared to the U.S. population.

Shirley Malcom, director of the SEA Change initiative at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, isn’t surprised by the study’s findings. “It reflects the patterns of doctorates within those fields. And it also reflects the diversity of the institutions that [minorities] work in,” she said.

Scholars at R1 institutions tend to publish the most, Malcom said, and yet those colleges have the least diversity on their faculties. At minority-serving institutions, there are many more scholars of color, but those professors often don’t have the time or the funding to do research. Minority-serving institutions tend to be under-resourced and more focused on teaching.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those scholars must be supported — with money and infrastructure — to increase their representation in scientific publications, Malcom said.

“Until there are real, significant structural changes,” she said, “I think this is the way it’s going to look.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Long_Chelsea.jpg
About the Author
Chelsea Long
Chelsea Long was a reporting intern for The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Collage of charts
Data
How Faculty Pay and Tenure Can Change Depending on Academic Discipline
Vector illustration of two researcher's hands putting dollar signs into a beaker leaking green liquid.
'Life Support'
As the Nation’s Research-Funding Model Ruptures, Private Money Becomes a Band-Aid
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the sculpture, The Thinker, interlaced with anotehr image of a robot posed as The Thinker with bits of binary code and red strips weaved in.
The Review | Essay
What I Learned Serving on My University’s AI Committee
By Megan Fritts
Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin