Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

Fight Over the Recording of Title IX Proceedings Exposes Gaps in Law and Trust

By Peter Schmidt November 17, 2016
An advocacy group, No Red Tape Columbia, rallied last month to demand that Columbia U. give students the right to record investigative interviews, disciplinary hearings, and other Title IX proceedings. The university says it needs to protect privacy, but some students say it is just trying to protect itself.
An advocacy group, No Red Tape Columbia, rallied last month to demand that Columbia U. give students the right to record investigative interviews, disciplinary hearings, and other Title IX proceedings. The university says it needs to protect privacy, but some students say it is just trying to protect itself.Jaime Danies, Columbia Spectator

Things got testy when Columbia University administrators met privately with students demanding a right to bring audio recorders with them when questioned about their complaints of gender-based misconduct.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

An advocacy group, No Red Tape Columbia, rallied last month to demand that Columbia U. give students the right to record investigative interviews, disciplinary hearings, and other Title IX proceedings. The university says it needs to protect privacy, but some students say it is just trying to protect itself.
An advocacy group, No Red Tape Columbia, rallied last month to demand that Columbia U. give students the right to record investigative interviews, disciplinary hearings, and other Title IX proceedings. The university says it needs to protect privacy, but some students say it is just trying to protect itself.Jaime Danies, Columbia Spectator

Things got testy when Columbia University administrators met privately with students demanding a right to bring audio recorders with them when questioned about their complaints of gender-based misconduct.

Curious about what happened? Listen yourself. One student surreptitiously recorded the meeting last month so that her advocacy group, No Red Tape Columbia, could post it all online.

She did so legally because Columbia is in New York, one of 39 states that allow people to record conversations without the consent of other participants. Some of its students have seized on audio recorders as tools to try to ensure their institution complies with the federal gender-equity law known as Title IX.

Just as they secretly recorded their meeting with administrators, No Red Tape members want to secure Columbia students the right to record any interviews, hearings, and appeals related to their complaints of rape, sexual assault, and other forms of gender-based misconduct.

Columbia has moved in the opposite direction. It recently revised its policies to clearly prohibit students involved in such misconduct proceedings from taking advantage of their freedom to record them under state law. Administrators there are standing by a requirement that students who bring misconduct complaints sign an agreement to abide by the rule, with violators facing disciplinary sanctions.

Campuses and Sexual Misconduct

See more recent articles from The Chronicle about the pressure on colleges over their handling of sexual harassment and assault.

How a 20-Page Letter Changed the Way Higher Education Handles Sexual Assault
An Uncertain Future for Title IX-Compliance Consultants
What It Took to Resolve a Federal Sexual-Assault Investigation at UVa
Fight Over the Recording of Title IX Proceedings Exposes Gaps in Law and Trust
What the Future Holds for the Federal Crackdown on Campus Sexual Assault
A University’s Struggle With Honor
‘Fundamental Failure’ on Sexual Assaults Brings Sweeping Change at Baylor
Tenure Rights and the Rise of Title IX: a Looming Culture Clash
Coaches Must ‘Step the Heck Out’ of Investigations of Players
AAUP Slams Education Dept. and Colleges Over Title IX Enforcement
Berkeley Is Under Fire, Again, for How It Handled Sexual Harassment
Colleges Focus on Preventing Sex Assaults Before They Happen
Why a Congresswoman Is Pressing Colleges to Do More on Harassment

The Columbia debate raises tough questions related to the protection of students under Title IX: How do colleges allow transparency in disciplinary proceedings while safeguarding students’ privacy? How can students ensure that administrators take their misconduct complaints seriously, and not just whitewash them?

Suzanne Goldberg, Columbia’s executive vice president for university life, says officials there have carefully considered students’ requests to record such proceedings and concluded that the costs outweigh the benefits.

Many other students, she says, actually seek assurances that they are not being recorded when they meet with investigators, and might be discouraged from coming forward with misconduct complaints if they feared that recordings of their statements would fall into the wrong hands.

No Red Tape Columbia argues that the university has overstated such concerns, and accuses administrators there of using the recording ban to cover up their failure to properly act on complaints. “What is most important to me is to hold the university accountable,” says Brandee C. Blocker, a law student and a leader of the campus group.

Further complicating the debate are longstanding tensions between Columbia, which is the subject of several federal investigations under Title IX, and student activists who have raised questions about the administration’s handling of reported sexual violence.

ADVERTISEMENT

So far, the group has publicized its cause through a campus protest last month and through an online petition endorsed by other student advocacy groups and several academic-labor unions. “We are going to continue to escalate,” Ms. Blocker says.

Lack of Guidance

The tensions at the heart of the Columbia debate pose quandaries for other colleges. Among those grappling with how to balance transparency and privacy, the University of Kentucky has gone to court to block its student newspaper’s access to information from a sexual-misconduct investigation involving a professor. It has argued that the release of even heavily redacted copies of misconduct complaints would violate federal laws protecting student privacy and would discourage other students from filing them.

At both Columbia and Stanford University, people involved in rape cases have used online media to publicize their adversaries’ emails and texts, giving credence to fears that recordings will be widely shared.

Peter F. Lake, director of the Center for Excellence in Higher Education Law and Policy at Stetson University, says colleges are at a loss for guidance because the chief law protecting student confidentiality — the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, or Ferpa — was not drafted with Title IX in mind. The Education Department’s guidance on records of sexual-misconduct proceedings has been limited mainly to its requirement of at least some access for all parties involved.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They are giving us a lot of space in which to make choices,” Mr. Lake says. Some advocates for accused students “are pushing for full and complete access” to such records, but the leaking of such information could be “catastrophic, particularly in terms of retraumatizing the victims.”

Many colleges make their own recordings of sexual-misconduct hearings. Such recordings are covered by Ferpa, and access to them is restricted, through either redactions of transcripts or requirements that the recordings or transcripts not leave a room.

As for students’ ability to act on their own to record either disciplinary hearings or their statements in interviews by investigators, the picture is mixed. A recent American Law Institute analysis of colleges’ policies concluded that many expressly prohibit students from making such recordings, and Ms. Goldberg says Columbia administrators have determined that “virtually all of our peer schools” have similar policies in place.

But Brett A. Sokolow, who conducts Title IX-related investigative interviews as president of the Ncherm Group, a consulting and law firm, says he often gets requests from students or college employees to record them, and “most colleges don’t have a clear policy allowing it or prohibiting it.” He says colleges need such policies because “a lot of students won’t ask permission. They’ll just come in and record.”

Haunted by Words

Ms. Blocker, the Columbia law student, says she neither asked permission nor announced her intentions when she discreetly turned on her cellphone’s recorder while being interviewed by university investigators in the spring of 2015. Ms. Blocker, who was being interviewed over her accusations of sexual assault and harassment against a classmate, says she tapped the button on her phone for practical reasons. She routinely uses it with the university’s blessing to record lectures, in response to a disability.

ADVERTISEMENT

In an essay last month in re:claim, an online student publication, Ms. Blocker argues that her recordings did more than refresh her memory. She says that they — in themselves, and when compared with the investigators’ notes — enable her to prove “that school officials misrepresented and distorted facts to help my assailant get away with it.”

Ms. Blocker’s essay posits that she was the reason that Columbia revised its policies to clearly prohibit students who have complained of gender-based misconduct from recording hearings, appeals, and investigative interviews. The revised policies, in effect as of September, require such student complainants to sign an agreement to abide by the rule or face disciplinary sanctions for violating it.

Ms. Goldberg, who calls Columbia’s policies “a national model,” says it has long barred students from recording investigative interviews, and “we thought it would be useful to clarify what had been the practice for some time.” Among the university’s chief concerns, she says, is that state law would require Columbia to make the complaining students’ recordings available to accused students, and vice versa.

Columbia is ‘more concerned with protecting its image and reputation than protecting the rights and well-being of survivors.’

No Red Tape Columbia’s petition accuses Columbia’s administration of being “more concerned with protecting its image and reputation than protecting the rights and well-being of survivors.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Sofie Karasek, director of education for the advocacy group End Rape on Campus, says she understands why students would want to make recordings if their college is not doing so, “given how often things can get distorted in these processes.”

Other national advocates take a different view. Laura L. Dunn, founder of the advocacy group SurvJustice, says, “I don’t want to discourage student activism,” but there are other means of bringing transparency to the process, such as requirements that colleges record proceeding themselves. Unlike recordings made by colleges, she says, recordings by students are not covered by Ferpa, and thus are much more vulnerable to being shared in ways that cause harm.

“There is a difference between a transcript with names redacted and an actual audio recording,” notes Michele Landis Dauber, a professor of law at Stanford who helped design its disciplinary process for sexual-assault cases. A recording made by a complaining student, she says, can be subject to a subpoena if, for example, the accused party sues for defamation.

“If he is the kind of person who would rape someone,” Ms. Dauber says, “he is the kind of person who might try to shame you in public.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Peter Schmidt writes about affirmative action, academic labor, and issues related to academic freedom. Contact him at peter.schmidt@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the November 25, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Peter Schmidt
Peter Schmidt was a senior writer for The Chronicle of Higher Education. He covered affirmative action, academic labor, and issues related to academic freedom. He is a co-author of The Merit Myth: How Our Colleges Favor the Rich and Divide America (The New Press, 2020).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

In Sexual-Misconduct Cases, Colleges Weigh Privacy Against Transparency
What ‘Yes Means Yes’ Means for Colleges’ Sex-Assault Investigations
Men Accused of Sexual Assault Face Long Odds When Suing Colleges for Gender Bias
In Rape Cases, Students’ Texts and Emails Face the Court of Public Opinion

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin