Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Advice

Finally, a Model for Disciplines to Track Ph.D. Career Outcomes

By Leonard Cassuto October 31, 2018
Careers-Graduate-Advisor
Kevin Van Aelst for The Chronicle

You can hear a nervous buzz around my department’s graduate-student offices each fall when the academic job listings are about to be published. Openings are posted all year round now, but the largest number still appear in the fall, and that time is upon us.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

You can hear a nervous buzz around my department’s graduate-student offices each fall when the academic job listings are about to be published. Openings are posted all year round now, but the largest number still appear in the fall, and that time is upon us.

Two of my Ph.D. students are trying the academic job market for the first time this year. Let’s call them “Amy” and “Tina.” Each plans to graduate next spring. Amy is undertaking a national search. Tina wants to stay close to the house she bought a couple of years ago, so she’ll be applying only for jobs within driving distance.

Those two equally reasonable choices will lead to completely different job searches — and possibly, very different outcomes. It’s my role as adviser to support my doctoral students in the ways that they each need. I’ll be discussing professorial careers with them, of course, and going over their applications. But we’ll talk about a range of other possibilities as well.

Professors are used to making rhetorical distinctions between “successful placements” and “failed job searches.” But the reality is much different.

Let’s consider the whole idea of placement. At the American Historical Association, or the AHA, a common refrain — and one I agree with — is that Ph.D.s aren’t “placed” in their careers by someone else. They get their own jobs, and they’re responsible for their own choices. In a column I wrote last year on academe’s job-market lexicon, I suggested that “outcomes” is a better word than “placements.”

As advisers, we’ve all got stories to tell about the career outcomes of our students. But the numbers tell a story, too. Individual doctoral programs usually try to keep track of their graduates. Some departments try harder than others. Some publish their results while others sit on their numbers — a venal decision that helps no one (which is a topic for another day). But efforts to tabulate the career outcomes of Ph.D.s across universities are rare.

Every year, students who do a national job search — like my own student, Amy — apply for dozens of faculty jobs. Some Ph.D.s snag those openings, but the number who don’t is probably larger. I say “probably” because our statistics don’t make any distinction between Amy’s broad search and Tina’s narrowly targeted one.

Tina knows she’ll apply for only a handful of professorships — her degree will be in literature but she can do the job-market math. So along with her academic applications, she’s conducting a robust parallel search for job possibilities in various nonfaculty sectors.

My two students stand at opposite ends of the spectrum of academic job seekers. Wherever a Ph.D. falls along that range, there will be consequences for their search and their job prospects. But academics can’t actually discern all the details of that spectrum (for instance, how many job candidates are doing a national search versus a targeted one) because we don’t have all the information.

Imagine a department whose job seekers were all conducting narrow, geographically limited searches like Tina’s. If none of them found faculty jobs and they all wound up working outside academe, would that mean their department had done a poor job of advising them? Of course not. Such a negative judgment would be even more ridiculous if those Ph.D.s were happy with the nonacademic jobs they’d found (as is often the case).

ADVERTISEMENT

Every year the Modern Language Association, or the MLA, compiles statistics listing the number of academic job openings and the larger number of newly minted Ph.D.s. The implication: All of those new Ph.D.’s will be competing for all of those jobs.

There are many problems with that assumption. First, it doesn’t take into account the backlog of job seekers from previous years. Nor do the numbers separate out those new Ph.D.s who aren’t looking for faculty jobs. And of course there is the Amy/Tina distinction: Not everyone looks for academic jobs in the same way.

The flaws in this assumption aren’t the MLA’s fault. Its researchers are skillful, but their data are limited, and don’t allow them to isolate the fine distinctions between job searchers. We need better ways of thinking about the employment outcomes of Ph.D.s. — and better numbers.

Which brings me to some good news in that area: This past summer, the AHA released Where Historians Work, an interactive, online database that allows users to track what happened to 10 years of history Ph.D.s.

ADVERTISEMENT

An impressive amount of work went into this project. First of all, AHA researchers located nearly 95 percent of the 8,515 people who got a history Ph.D. at an American university between 2004 and 2013. The designers chose that 10-year period because it bridges the Great Recession of 2008, and so offers a picture of Ph.D. employment both before and after it.

Then they sorted their data to allow for comparison across years, subfields, geography, and other categories — including, of course, outcomes.

The result is an addictive compilation of graphs, charts, maps, and other interactive visual tools that I don’t know the names of. You can manipulate the data within these fields and — if my experience is any indication — you may find yourself doing so for quite a while.

Emily Swafford, director of academic and professional affairs at the AHA, and Dylan Ruediger, coordinator of its career-diversity program, offered some preliminary conclusions in a recent article in Perspectives, the association’s newsletter.

ADVERTISEMENT

In some cases, the data confirm long-held suspicions: For example, ever since the 2008 recession, fewer historians have gotten tenure-track positions and more of them work in nontenure-track, full-time teaching jobs than was the case pre-recession. The database also showcases some unexpected findings: The employment patterns of female Ph.D.s are virtually identical to those of males — meaning that there is no gender gap at the point of hire.

As to who’s getting hired where, Where Historians Work offers a detailed pie chart. Some basic facts:

  • About 51 percent of the decade of Ph.D.s sampled are either tenured or tenure-track professors, with jobs at four-year colleges and universities accounting for nearly all of that total.
  • About 16 percent teach full-time in nontenure-track positions
  • So about two thirds of the total Ph.D.s surveyed teach full-time at the college level.
  • About 7 percent work for nonprofit groups, and another 7 percent in the private sector.
  • Almost 4 percent work in government, and almost 6 percent in higher-education staff or administration.

Because the user can work with these numbers (to look at specific three-year periods, for example), there are many more results than that.

The Graduate Adviser - package Promo
The Graduate Adviser
In this monthly column, Leonard Cassuto explores the ins and outs of doctoral training, with advice for both graduate students and their faculty mentors.
  • How to Write a Dissertation During a Pandemic
  • How Can Graduate Programs and Students Prepare for an Uncertain Fall?
  • The Gender Politics of Doctoral Reform
  • Why We Need a Yelp for Doctoral Programs

Other findings fairly beg for further study. “Graduates of many programs remain clustered in the cities or regions where they earned their degree,” Swafford and Ruediger observe, “while other programs’ graduates seem to scatter.” Are some locations more likely to produce job searchers like Amy, and others more likely to create a Tina? I’d like to know the answer to that one.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our main aim in creating the database was to increase transparency around careers for history Ph.D.s.,” said Swafford in an email. “In earlier forays into data gathering, we learned a lot, but people would often say, ‘Well, that doesn’t apply to my students’ or ‘my field’ or ‘my university.’ So, we said, OK, we’ll gather data on all Ph.D.s from all departments.”

Where Historians Work enables assessment backed by actual data. All of us who teach and advise graduate students need to reflect on our practices, from admissions to curriculum to all forms of student support. This new database suggests ways we can do a better job of that — even if our field isn’t history.

Swafford also hopes “that prospective graduate students will use it as they contemplate whether to pursue a Ph.D.” She speculated that “the diversity of outcomes encouraged a more diverse pool of applicants. But mostly we hope that people will dig in to the data and explore what it shows about where historians work.”

Academics across all fields should start collecting our own data on this front and digging into it, because there’s a lot more work to be done. For one thing, we need to understand more about attrition from doctoral programs (which is a staggering 50 percent) better than we do. It’s important to know what becomes of our graduates, but the noncompleters are likewise ours. We spend years training people who leave doctoral programs ABD. We need to find out where they go.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s critical work for tomorrow. For today, Where Historians Work is an important step forward — and a model for other fields to follow.

Leonard Cassuto, a professor of English at Fordham University, writes regularly about graduate education in this space. His latest book is The Graduate School Mess: What Caused It and How We Can Fix It, published by Harvard University Press. He welcomes comments, suggestions, and stories at lcassuto@erols.com. Twitter handle: @LCassuto.

A version of this article appeared in the December 7, 2018, issue.
Read other items in The Graduate Adviser.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
cassuto_leonard.jpg
About the Author
Leonard Cassuto
Leonard Cassuto is a professor of English at Fordham University who writes regularly for The Chronicle about graduate education. His newest book is Academic Writing as if Readers Matter, from Princeton University Press. He co-wrote, with Robert Weisbuch, The New Ph.D.: How to Build a Better Graduate Education. He welcomes comments and suggestions at cassuto@fordham.edu. Find him on X @LCassuto.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin