Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The States

For a Slot at a 4-Year University, Some North Carolina Students Could Soon Need a Community-College Degree

By Sarah Brown January 15, 2016

Spurred by language in the state’s 2015 budget, North Carolina’s public-university system is weighing a plan that would require its institutions to enroll some students only if they’re willing to go to a community college first.

At the behest of Republican lawmakers, the state’s university system is studying a plan that would route applicants seen as less-prepared to two-year institutions. Above, students on the campus of Lenoir Community College, in Kinston, N.C.
At the behest of Republican lawmakers, the state’s university system is studying a plan that would route applicants seen as less-prepared to two-year institutions. Above, students on the campus of Lenoir Community College, in Kinston, N.C.Zach Frailey, AP IMages

With a report to state lawmakers due in early March, the idea is stirring uncertainty across a state in which the legislature and the university system have frequently been at odds in recent years.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Spurred by language in the state’s 2015 budget, North Carolina’s public-university system is weighing a plan that would require its institutions to enroll some students only if they’re willing to go to a community college first.

At the behest of Republican lawmakers, the state’s university system is studying a plan that would route applicants seen as less-prepared to two-year institutions. Above, students on the campus of Lenoir Community College, in Kinston, N.C.
At the behest of Republican lawmakers, the state’s university system is studying a plan that would route applicants seen as less-prepared to two-year institutions. Above, students on the campus of Lenoir Community College, in Kinston, N.C.Zach Frailey, AP IMages

With a report to state lawmakers due in early March, the idea is stirring uncertainty across a state in which the legislature and the university system have frequently been at odds in recent years.

The “NC Guaranteed Admission Program,” as the proposal is called, would require the universities to identify their least-qualified admitted students, route those students to community colleges, and guarantee those who earn associate degrees within three years admission as juniors. Officials with the university and community-college systems have been charged with devising ways to carry out such a program, which would start with students entering college in the fall of 2017, and presenting their findings and recommendations to lawmakers and other state officials by March 1.

Supporters of the program — including Republican lawmakers, several of whom pushed for its place in the budget, and the John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy, a conservative think tank that has exerted a strong pull over policy in the state — say it is necessary to decrease student debt and improve the university system’s six-year graduation rate, which is 67.5 percent. That’s several points above the national average.

Most university chancellors and provosts are reserving comment on the program until the report to lawmakers is completed. “Everyone wants to do everything we can to ensure access on the part of students to a high-quality education at a reasonable price,” James W. Dean Jr., provost of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said in an email. “Over the next few weeks and months, we will sort out whether this proposal is helpful in this regard.”

But faculty leaders are not holding their fire. They say the plan would cause logistical headaches for the universities, push weaker students into colleges with fewer resources, and send many prospective students out of state, resulting in harmful enrollment declines. The lawmakers who back the program have offered little guidance about how it would work, said Andrew G. Moretz, the university system’s vice president for government relations and chief liaison to the legislature.

A Lack of Specifics

Proposals for the deferred-admission plan have appeared in some form in North Carolina’s budget bills for the past three years. State Rep. D. Craig Horn, a Republican, said the idea had been inspired by a conversation among a group of lawmakers about how to mitigate student debt and improve graduation rates.

The lawmakers looked particularly at the bottom quartile of students who enrolled in the state’s public universities, Mr. Horn said, and realized that those students “had a terrible track record of graduation. So what are they getting for their money?”

For students from humble backgrounds, spending two years at a community college — and possibly saving $25,000 or more per year — would be a big deal, said State Sen. Tom McInnis, another Republican who has spoken in favor of the program. (Mr. McInnis is already familiar to faculty members in the state: He sparked an outcry last year by proposing a bill that would have mandated a 4/4 teaching load for all professors in the university system.)

Another benefit of two-year colleges, said Jenna A. Robinson, president of the Pope Center, is that their instructors “have spent more time and focused more on what remediation should look like.” (About 25 percent of the university system’s graduates are transfer students; more than half of those come from community colleges.)

The description of the guaranteed-admission program that made it into the 2015 Appropriations Act, House Bill 97, isn’t rife with specifics. It calls for a study of a program that would allow deferred students who complete an associate degree within three years to obtain guaranteed admission at the four-year institution to which they had originally applied. It also requires universities to reserve places for those students by reducing freshman enrollment for each academic year by the number of deferred students.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the description doesn’t specify how many admitted students each campus should route to community colleges. The North Carolina House’s budget proposal last year initially required that at least 1,305 students participate in the program in its first year, and that the program should be effective for students entering college in the fall of 2016. The proposal also encouraged university and community-college officials to “increase the number of deferred admissions as appropriate.” That language did not appear in the final budget, enacted in September, which pushed the proposed start date for the program back to 2017.

Mr. Horn said he didn’t want to draw “a hard and fast line” to determine how many students should be deferred. That should be left up to the campuses, he said.

“This is not about a certain percentage or number per year,” said State Sen. David L. Curtis, a Republican, “but all students unprepared to do college-level work.”

‘We Need to Up the Game’

But how does one define who is least prepared? And who makes that determination? Those are two questions that Tony E. Graham, an associate professor in the School of Technology at North Carolina A&T State University, is asking.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Graham, who is president of the Faculty Senate at his university, also expressed concern that the program would disproportionately hurt the state’s minority-serving institutions by further reducing enrollment after several years of declines.

Another uncertainty: how campuses would reserve spots for students whose enrollment is deferred. Mr. Moretz, the university system vice president, pointed out that the plan would require the flagship campus, in Chapel Hill, “which has a 91-percent graduation rate,” to turn away even more students.

‘What we’re going to be tasked with saying is, You’re admitted, but you can’t enroll.’

Would students admitted to four-year institutions be willing to go to a community college first? Mr. Moretz worried that the plan could drive some students to private colleges or for-profit colleges, or outside of North Carolina. Students who were offered deferred admission to Chapel Hill might consider the University of Virginia instead, he said; students deferred from North Carolina State University might opt for the Georgia Institute of Technology or Virginia Tech.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The mere nature of applying to UNC institutions indicates an intent on attending a four-year institution,” Mr. Moretz said. “What we’re going to be tasked with saying is, You’re admitted, but you can’t enroll.”

Then there’s the dispute over whether community-college graduates are as prepared for rigorous academic work as are students who spend their first two years at a four-year university. In North Carolina, Senator Curtis said, 74 percent of community-college transfers go on to earn a bachelor’s degree, while six of the university system’s campuses have six-year graduation rates below 50 percent.

But, Representative Horn said, “we need to up the game at our community colleges,” which he described as under-resourced and too focused on vocational education.

Mr. Curtis said one way to design a deferred-admission program would involve raising the UNC system’s admission standards, which currently require a high-school grade-point average of 2.5 or greater. Officials could increase the minimum, he said, and route students between 2.5 and the new baseline to community colleges.

‘Just Getting Started’

The universities have already bolstered their relationship with community colleges over the past five years, Mr. Moretz said, pointing to an articulation agreement that the two systems signed in 2014 to ease the transfer process.

ADVERTISEMENT

That same year, Mr. Moretz and several officials of the university and community-college systems gave a presentation to the legislature’s joint education-oversight committee about the deferred-admission plan. Mr. Moretz said he told lawmakers, “We’re just getting started. Let’s don’t layer something else on top.”

The community-college system generally supports the program, though, Mr. Moretz said. Scott Ralls, who led the community-college system for seven years before stepping down as president last year, said in 2013 that “the clearer those pathways, the better it is, the better that will be for our long-term work force in North Carolina.” A spokeswoman for the community colleges said officials are still weighing the pros and cons.

But university faculty members are skeptical of the program’s ability to increase access and graduation rates for students from less-privileged backgrounds. If deferrals were determined primarily by high-school grades, the proposal could shut more of those students out, said Stephen T. Leonard, a professor of political science at Chapel Hill and president of the system’s Faculty Assembly.

“We’re trying to be smarter about the admissions standards we use so that we can identify potentially talented students who may not qualify under a less-flexible kind of traditional admission standard,” he said. “This would make that effort a lot more difficult.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Sarah Brown writes about a range of higher-education topics, including sexual assault, race on campus, and Greek life. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.


Questions or concerns about this article? Email us or submit a letter to the editor.

A version of this article appeared in the January 29, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
SarahBrown2024
About the Author
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is The Chronicle’s news editor. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin