> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Leadership
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

For Future College Chiefs, a Challenge to Balance Change and Consensus

By  Jack Stripling
March 19, 2014
Washington

Future college presidents will have to rapidly reinvent the institutions they lead while still respecting the often time-consuming process of building consensus across the campus, a panel of leadership experts gathered at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies said on Tuesday.

Finding administrators who can pull off such a balancing act, panelists said, is a pressing challenge that colleges may not be fully prepared to meet.

Michael M. Crow, president of Arizona State University, kicked off the discussion with a half-joking description of what he described as the decision-making process at Columbia University, where he was executive vice provost before he moved to Arizona State, in 2002.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Future college presidents will have to rapidly reinvent the institutions they lead while still respecting the often time-consuming process of building consensus across the campus, a panel of leadership experts gathered at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies said on Tuesday.

Finding administrators who can pull off such a balancing act, panelists said, is a pressing challenge that colleges may not be fully prepared to meet.

Michael M. Crow, president of Arizona State University, kicked off the discussion with a half-joking description of what he described as the decision-making process at Columbia University, where he was executive vice provost before he moved to Arizona State, in 2002.

“The academic senate,” he said, “has considered the matter; 88 senators yes, one senator no. The matter fails, and it will be considered again in five academic years.”

Mr. Crow is a frequent critic of the pace of change in higher education, which he says is ill suited to serve today’s students, particularly low-income individuals who graduate at lower rates than do their wealthier classmates.

ADVERTISEMENT

Throughout the forum, titled “Leadership for the Innovative University,” panelists wrestled with whether traditional academics, who still dominate college presidencies, are best suited for a job where fund raising and politicking increasingly dominate the portfolio. But William E. (Brit) Kirwan, chancellor of the University System of Maryland, argued that corporate leaders and other nontraditional candidates may not be prepared for higher education’s system of shared governance, where professors are unlikely to simply fall in line with a chief executive.

“It’s not that we should just now open the doors and look carte blanche at external leadership,” said Mr. Kirwan, who rose through the ranks as a mathematics professor on Maryland’s College Park campus before taking on a series of administrative roles.

‘Going Over to the Dark Side’

Perhaps it is not necessarily true, though, that the desire for broad-based organizational buy-in is so peculiar to higher education. Benjamin C. Freakley, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant general who participated in the panel, said it was a “misconception” that leaders in an all-volunteer military always get their way without some charisma and even cajoling. A colonel in Afghanistan working with NATO, he said, had “better be a good consensus leader.”

Joseph E. Aoun, president of Northeastern University, said that college presidents could do a better job of explicitly preparing people on the campus to step up.

“You want to groom people who are going to replace you, kick you out, and do a better job than you,” he said. “So give the signal.”

ADVERTISEMENT

One difficulty with grooming the next generation of college leaders, however, is that many professors look askance at a faculty member who expresses interest in becoming an administrator. Jamienne S. Studley, acting under secretary in the U.S. Department of Education and a former president of Skidmore College, said that colleges were among the few places where taking a leadership position is tantamount to “going over to the dark side.”

In conjunction with Tuesday’s forum, Arizona State and Georgetown announced the formation of a joint training program for aspiring college presidents, which will begin as a pilot project in the fall. The yearlong Institute for Innovation in Higher Education Leadership will blend online seminars with four weekend sessions divided between Washington and Phoenix.

Other training programs for college presidents, including Harvard University’s popular Seminar for New Presidents, already exist. Organizers of the Georgetown-Arizona State project say the program will be distinctive in its emphasis on long-range challenges facing higher education, as opposed to the day-to-day workings of the presidency. Topics slated for discussion include designing new business models for colleges and reshaping organizational cultures.

Jeffrey J. Selingo, a professor of practice at Arizona State, has helped to organize the institute and moderated Tuesday’s forum. He is a contributing editor at The Chronicle and author of College (Un) Bound: The Future of Higher Education and What It Means for Students (New Harvest/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013).

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Leadership & GovernanceFinance & Operations
Jack Stripling
Jack Stripling was a senior writer at The Chronicle, where he covered college leadership, particularly presidents and governing boards. Follow him on Twitter @jackstripling.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin