> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
College Access
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Free College Is Dead in Congress, but It’s Alive and Well in the States

By  Eric Kelderman
November 3, 2021
How Clinton’s ‘Free College’ Could Cause a Cascade of Problems 1
Sam Kalda for The Chronicle

President Biden’s plan to make two years of community college tuition-free nationwide is going nowhere in Congress at the moment.

But across the country, such “College Promise” programs continue to grow among state and local governments as elected officials look for ways to improve college going and work-force preparation.

The idea of offering free tuition has grown steadily since the advent of the Tennessee Promise program in 2014, which became the model for a federal program proposed by President Barack Obama

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

President Biden’s plan to make two years of community college tuition-free nationwide is going nowhere in Congress at the moment.

But across the country, “College Promise” programs continue to grow among state and local governments as elected officials look for ways to improve college-going and work-force preparation.

The idea of offering free tuition has grown steadily since the advent of the Tennessee Promise program in 2014, which became the model for a federal program proposed by President Barack Obama. Depending on definitions, half to two-thirds of states and scores of localities now offer some kind of program for free tuition, mostly at community and technical colleges.

Two years of free college tuition was a key campaign issue for Biden as a candidate in the 2020 presidential election and was originally included in the $3.5-trillion budget-reconciliation bill that Democrats proposed this year. But that provision, with a $109-billion price tag, was cut from the bill as moderates and progressives within the party negotiated to halve the overall cost of the legislation.

ADVERTISEMENT

What remains in that legislation, which has yet to be finalized let alone voted on, is a $40-billion investment in higher education, including a $550 increase in the maximum Pell Grant award, a $500-million grant program to increase college completion, and $9 billion in financial-aid and research support for minority-serving institutions and tribal colleges.

The bill also includes some major policy changes, such as making federal student aid available to undocumented residents who have registered under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Higher-education leaders have signaled their gratitude for those amounts, which have been called historic one-time increases. But there is still a sense, for many, that stripping free tuition from the bill is a lost opportunity to increase college access on a monumental scale.

“This felt like an opportunity to take some bold action, try to get to where we want to be as a nation on this,” said Laura W. Perna, vice provost for faculty at the University of Pennsylvania’s Graduate School of Education.

A federal free-college program would increase economic output by $170 billion a year for the next decade and income-tax revenues by $66 billion annually, one recent study concluded.
ADVERTISEMENT

There is also an economic cost for not providing free college nationwide, according to an analysis by the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. That study concluded that a federal free-college program would increase economic output by $170 billion a year for the next decade and income-tax revenues by $66 billion annually.

Morley Winograd, who leads the nonprofit Campaign for Free College Tuition, said that although free college has some bipartisan support in Congress, it was not among the key issues for progressive Democrats.

But there were also design flaws in the plan that drew critiques from across the political spectrum and may have contributed to the plan’s failure.

Kevin Carey, vice president for education policy and knowledge management at New America, a left-leaning think tank, found that the Biden plan would give far more federal money to states like California, where community-college tuition is relatively low, than to states like Vermont, where it is far more expensive.

Beth Akers, an economist and senior fellow with the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute, said the complexities of designing a federal-state partnership made this kind of problem inevitable and would quite likely burden future efforts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Akers said free-college programs belong at the state and local level where they can be tailored to meet the economic needs of the work force.

Despite Congress’s unwillingness to include free college in the budget bill, the public remains largely supportive. A Pew Research Center poll conducted in July found that 63 percent of respondents favored free tuition at all public colleges. Even among Republicans, who generally oppose the idea, a majority of those ages 18 to 49 without a college degree support free college.

Martha Kanter, chief executive of College Promise, a nonprofit group that advocates for free tuition nationally, said the next debate about a federal free-college program needs to happen during a reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, which was last updated under President Obama.

That’s unlikely, given the narrowly divided Congress. But the campaign for more promise programs will continue at the state and local level, said Kanter, who noted that many conservative-leaning states have been as willing to enact free-college programs as have many of those that lean progressive.

“The country has enough money to pay for what it values,” Kanter said.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Diversity, Equity, & InclusionPolitical Influence & ActivismLaw & PolicyFinance & OperationsCommunity CollegesThe Workplace
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin