> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

From Prison Uniforms to Graduation Robes

By  Peter Monaghan
February 19, 2017
Students graduate in 2008 at New York’s Woodbourne Correctional Facility.
Karl Rabe
Students graduate in 2008 at New York’s Woodbourne Correctional Facility.

Since 2001, about 400 men and women in six New York prisons have obtained liberal-arts degrees from Bard College. Through the Bard Prison Initiative, they have taken the same demanding courses as Bard’s on-campus students.

Two new, complementary books celebrate those results. In Liberating Minds: The Case for College in Prison (The New Press, 2017), Ellen Condliffe Lagemann, a distinguished fellow in the initiative, notes that while nationally more than 50 percent of released prisoners end up back in prison within three years, only 2 percent of the graduates of the Bard initiative do. Taking college courses reduces recidivism far more than does completing prison high-school and vocational programs. Also well above average is the 75 percent of the project’s alumni who find gainful employment within a month of release.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Since 2001, about 400 men and women in six New York prisons have obtained liberal-arts degrees from Bard College. Through the Bard Prison Initiative, they have taken the same demanding courses as Bard’s on-campus students.

Two new, complementary books celebrate those results. In Liberating Minds: The Case for College in Prison (The New Press, 2017), Ellen Condliffe Lagemann, a distinguished fellow in the initiative, notes that while nationally more than 50 percent of released prisoners end up back in prison within three years, only 2 percent of the graduates of the Bard initiative do. Taking college courses reduces recidivism far more than does completing prison high-school and vocational programs. Also well above average is the 75 percent of the project’s alumni who find gainful employment within a month of release.

Projects like Bard’s not only save prison systems many millions of dollars, Ms. Lagemann writes, they also allow graduates, and their families, to become more financially stable. Children of graduates become more likely to go to college, too, and, like many of Bard’s prison alumni, to complete graduate degrees, including ones at well-regarded institutions.

Access to higher education should be extended from privately financed programs like Bard’s to as many imprisoned Americans as possible, contends Ms. Lagemann, a former dean of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Candidates for such programs are hardly lacking. Thanks to a decades-long incarceration boom, in 2014 some 2.3 million Americans were locked up. But college opportunities are very few. In 1994, then-President Bill Clinton signed tough crime legislation that ended prisoners’ eligibility for Pell Grants. That shut down virtually all 772 college-in-prison programs operating in 1,287 U.S. correctional facilities.

ADVERTISEMENT

Daniel Karpowitz, one of Ms. Lagemann’s colleagues at the initiative and the author of the other new book about it, said in an interview that the effort can teach colleges a lesson about “inclusive excellence.” It demonstrates that a population barely on admissions officers’ radar — “highly capable students in the correctional facility 45 minutes away” — can pursue through the liberal arts what campus-dwelling students can: “the deeper purposes of fulfilling oneself intellectually; preparing oneself to be an informed, critical, or skeptical citizen; finding purpose in life.” Mr. Karpowitz is the initiative’s director of policy and academics.

In College in Prison: Reading in an Age of Mass Incarceration (Rutgers University Press, 2017), he suggests that a privately financed effort like Bard’s can provide a blueprint for college-in-prison programs.

Extending a college to prisoners then becomes “less about how people in prison might change,” he writes, “and more about how we, as a society increasingly defined by the scope and quality of our prisons, might change ourselves.”

Advocates of such programs must start, he says, by facing squarely such realities as the presence of many violent offenders in programs like Bard’s. To dodge that, he says, would be to dishonor a sincere objection to prison education: that it implies that “individuals are not rightly held culpable for their own actions,” even that “there is something morally or politically wrong with punishment.”

One response to that, says Mr. Karpowitz, who is also a lecturer in law and the humanities at Bard, comes from the initiative’s graduates’ greatly increased ability to acknowledge and understand their responsibility. Prison faculty members like him, he says, must make the case that when American incarceration so undeniably reveals “strong class and racial inequality,”, the methods Americans use to hold people accountable for actions that affront “our avowed love of freedom … should strengthen both agency and dignity.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Otherwise,” he writes, “they become a mockery.”

Peter Monaghan is a national correspondent for The Chronicle. Email him at pmonaghan3@mac.com.

A version of this article appeared in the February 24, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Scholarship & Research
Peter Monaghan
Peter Monaghan is a correspondent for The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • Colleges Face Political Opposition in Renewed Efforts to Educate Prisoners
  • Liberal-Arts Colleges Reach Minds Behind Bars
  • Doing Time, With a Degree to Show for It
  • From Cellblock to Campus, One Black Man Defies the Data
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin