Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
The Review

Galileo’s Art of Thinking

By Peter Monaghan October 30, 2011
In a painting by Tito Lessi, Galileo dictates to his son. A new book explores Galileo’s involvement in his era’s revival of classical learning.
In a painting by Tito Lessi, Galileo dictates to his son. A new book explores Galileo’s involvement in his era’s revival of classical learning.Scala, Art Resource

To understand Galileo, do what Galileo did, says Mark A. Peterson: Remain alert to insights from across the arts and sciences.

In Galileo’s Muse: Renaissance Mathematics and the Arts (Harvard University Press), Peterson, a professor of mathematics and physics at Mount Holyoke College, argues that the intellectual formation and reach of the great Renaissance thinker has not been fully understood.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

To understand Galileo, do what Galileo did, says Mark A. Peterson: Remain alert to insights from across the arts and sciences.

In Galileo’s Muse: Renaissance Mathematics and the Arts (Harvard University Press), Peterson, a professor of mathematics and physics at Mount Holyoke College, argues that the intellectual formation and reach of the great Renaissance thinker has not been fully understood.

And, he adds, an inadequate view of Galileo makes for an incomplete picture of the great scientific ferment of the 17th century—a new understanding of the physical world—to which Galileo crucially contributed.

Among scientists, the best-known Galileo is the one who formulated laws of freely falling bodies and the parabolic path of projectiles—findings that would be critical half a century later for Isaac Newton’s framing of universal principles of motion. To almost everyone else, the familiar Galileo is the one the Inquisition sentenced to permanent house arrest for advocating a Copernican, Sun-centered worldview, deemed blasphemous.

Galileo waded into that fraught issue with observations he had made of the heavens—with improved telescopes he had designed—as well as of such terrestrial phenomena as tides. Oddly, church-imposed detention may have done Galileo a favor; while under sentence he contentedly wrote Two New Sciences (1638), his last book and the culmination of his life’s work.

Two New Sciences mingled the arts, including poetry, music, painting, and architecture, with ideas more recognizably scientific by today’s standards. Peterson claims that by ignoring the nature of that mingling, historians of science have missed the extent to which the mathematics of Renaissance arts, as much as of Renaissance sciences, drove the emergence of modern science. “The Copernican controversy crowds out important elements of Galileo’s story,” the scholar says.

He notes that simultaneous consideration of artistic and scientific facets of physical reality was a practice that Galileo developed early in his studies, long before the dramatic censure by Rome that would unduly influence how he was viewed throughout history.

Peterson noticed that aspect of Galileo’s work early in his own academic career. It was the scientist’s skill as a prose stylist that attracted Peterson’s attention. Riveted, he read on, and he came to the same puzzle that some other scholars had scratched their heads over: “Renaissance mathematics didn’t seem to be leading up to Galileo, at all,” he says by phone from his Mount Holyoke office. “There was something discontinuous.”

Galileo had seemed to ignore writings from his time and recent centuries, having concluded that Hellenistic Greek mathematics was of better use in solving the problems that concerned him. For example, Galileo credited not medieval “impetus theory” for his discoveries about parabolic motion, but the findings of Hellenistic Greeks of 2,000 years earlier, Peterson says.

Archimedes, Pythagoras, Euclid, and other classical Greek mathematicians became crucial to Galileo’s thinking. He “really did regard himself as the direct heir of the Greeks,” Peterson writes.

ADVERTISEMENT

That makes sense, Peterson says. As a child, Galileo studied the arts and humanities at a monastic boarding school, then began university studies in medicine. For lack of funds, he returned home. Proudly self-educated, he drew extremely well and studied poetry attentively, to the great benefit of his later, much-admired prose style.

He also learned from his father to play the lute, expertly. That entailed studying not just technique, but also the mathematics of music, the counterpart of astronomical mathematics. At that time, astronomical mathematics lay closer to theology and moral philosophy than to physics. That was thanks to the Romans, who had reformulated Greek learning in search of a mathematics of abstractions to explain perfection, the eternal, the heavens. By contrast, Galileo’s passion was the earthier mathematics he found in music and other arts.

Coming to see this, Peterson began to explore Galileo’s involvement in his era’s revival of classical learning. He also looked for other thinkers who had shared the scientist’s view of the continuing utility of Greek mathematics. Dante, for example.

Galileo had commented on Dante’s conception of the Inferno in his Divine Comedy. When Peterson first began looking at that question, in the late 1970s, he found that Dante had deployed “unexpected mathematical sophistication.” For example, three centuries before Galileo, the poet had hinted at the calculus that Newton and Leibniz would develop 350 years later. To construct his Paradise, Dante had made poetic use of ideas about space that foreshadowed a 20th-century concept in theoretical physics: He had, specifically, created a four-dimensional, curved-space “hypersphere.”

ADVERTISEMENT

A good deal of Peterson’s book examines the classical mathematical legacy in Renaissance painting, music, and architecture, as well as in the earlier poetics of Dante. The author sets the influence of Archimedes, Pythagoras, and company apart from the everyday applications of numbers—in commerce, construction, business, surveying. Those uses, too, were reformed in the late-medieval and early-Renaissance eras, thanks in good part to the influence of Arabic science.

If the interplay among the arts and sciences has become a history-of-science commonplace, it has rarely been presented by someone as historically and scientifically well versed as Peterson. He explains such developments as the emergence of perspective in Western art clearly enough for nonspecialists in science or history.

A scientist’s eyes can be helpful when analyzing scientific history, Peterson notes. Long in contention, for example, has been whether Galileo was religious. Peterson thinks not, or not exactly. If Galileo thought little about God, and more about making good use of God-given intellect, that is something scientists can understand, he says. “Scientists very often satisfy their religious impulses with something scientific, and nonscientists don’t realize how perfectly that works, so that might look like irreligion to them.”

No doubt such disputes will be stoked by Peterson’s book, which has already raised one eyebrow, a bibliographic one. On the basis of his study of a 1627 manuscript, Oratione de Mathematicae Laudibus, a lecture attributed to Galileo’s protégé Niccolo Aggiunti, Peterson argues that the lecture’s author was more likely Galileo himself.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a review in New Scientist, the Galileo authority William R. Shea (he holds the “Galileo Chair” of History of Science at the University of Padua) says he doubts that: “Aggiunti may have talked with Galileo about his lecture, but it cannot be said to evoke Galileo’s style.”

As other Galileo scholars study the arguments, at least Peterson will not be at risk of house arrest. He will be on sabbatical, probably spending more time on the strictly physics-related end of his broad array of interests. There, he studies the fluid dynamics of cell motility, a phenomenon that even looking through Galileo’s telescopes the wrong way wouldn’t help explain.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Peter Monaghan
Peter Monaghan is a correspondent for The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin