> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Governor Had ‘Undue Influence’ Over U. of South Carolina Presidential Search, Accreditor Finds

By  Eric Kelderman
January 17, 2020
The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools found “adequate evidence of undue influence from” Gov. Henry McMaster of South Carolina in the U. of South Carolina’s presidential selection.
Sean Rayford, AP Images
The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools found “adequate evidence of undue influence from” Gov. Henry McMaster of South Carolina in the U. of South Carolina’s presidential selection.

The University of South Carolina and its Board of Trustees must answer questions about how the institution will be protected from political pressure in choosing its leadership, according to its accrediting agency.

The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges sent a letter this week to the university regarding the appointment of its president, Lt. Gen. Robert L. Caslen Jr., in July. “There appears to be adequate evidence of undue influence from the governor during the presidential-selection process,” said a letter from Belle S. Wheelan, president of the accrediting agency.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

The University of South Carolina and its Board of Trustees must answer questions about how the institution will be protected from political pressure in choosing its leadership, according to its accrediting agency.

The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges sent a letter this week to the university regarding the appointment of its president, Lt. Gen. Robert L. Caslen Jr., in July. “There appears to be adequate evidence of undue influence from the governor during the presidential-selection process,” said a letter from Belle S. Wheelan, president of the accrediting agency.

The commission has not put any kind of penalty on the university, but will require a monitoring report in the fall.

The university’s board had halted a search process in the spring, when it couldn’t settle on a finalist. Within a few weeks, Gov. Henry McMaster, a Republican, began calling board members to urge them to vote for Caslen. The board approved the former superintendent of the United States Military Academy at West Point on a split vote that prompted student protests.

The university had already been asked by the accreditor to show whether it was meeting the commission’s standards — a special report from the university did not satisfy the commission.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The current report is only partially responsive to steps that will be taken regarding board education and related processes,” said the letter from the commission. “The institution has not yet demonstrated that its governing board protects the institution from undue influence.”

The governor’s office disputed the accreditor’s findings. A prepared statement, reported by the The State, said that McMaster’s advocacy had been well within his role as an ex-officio board member. “To suggest that he can’t make phone calls to fellow board members about such an important decision is ludicrous,” the paper quoted the governor’s statement as saying.

Through a representative, the university declined to comment on the accreditor’s latest determination, but re-sent a statement it originally issued in December, following the commission’s decision not to issue any penalty: “The board sees the review as an opportunity for reflection and to reaffirm our commitment to meeting the highest standards of ethical, transparent, and accountable board governance, both in word and in action.”

A version of this article appeared in the January 31, 2020, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Leadership & Governance
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin