Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
Research

Grant Dispute Throws an Unwritten Rule of Academic Poaching Out the Window

By Paul Basken July 23, 2015
When Paul S. Aisen left one California university for another, he planned to take a $55-million grant from the National Institutes of Health along with him. Not so fast, said his old employer.
When Paul S. Aisen left one California university for another, he planned to take a $55-million grant from the National Institutes of Health along with him. Not so fast, said his old employer.Nelvin C. Cepeda, U-T San Diego, San Diego Union-Tribune

A less-than-collegial battle between two major research universities in laid-back Southern California says much about the severity of the financial pressures mounting on American higher education.

Among research universities a longstanding gentlemen’s agreement has held that a scientist who moves from one institution to another is allowed to carry any grant support along to his or her new home.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

A less-than-collegial battle between two major research universities in laid-back Southern California says much about the severity of the financial pressures mounting on American higher education.

Among research universities a longstanding gentlemen’s agreement has held that a scientist who moves from one institution to another is allowed to carry any grant support along to his or her new home.

Now, with universities counting every dollar, that bit of protocol may become a quaint courtesy of days gone by.

The dispute broke out last month, when Paul S. Aisen, a professor of neurosciences at the University of California at San Diego and director of its Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study, resigned to join the University of Southern California.

The Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study, known as the ADCS, was financed in 2013 by a five-year, $55-million grant from the National Institutes of Health, and Dr. Aisen intended to take the grant with him to USC.

But under NIH rules, grants are awarded to institutions, not individuals. UC-San Diego acknowledges that it is typical for a university to allow the transfer of a researcher’s grants to a new institution. But that courtesy is rarely extended in the case of very large awards involving multiple faculty members, such as center grants, said David A. Brenner, dean of medicine at UC-San Diego.

So this month UC-San Diego sued Dr. Aisen and USC in state court in San Diego. The suit accused the professor of blocking UC-San Diego from gaining computer access to his study’s data, and accused USC of encouraging such behavior by giving Dr. Aisen benefits that include a $500,000 annual salary guaranteed through 2020.

“We are completely baffled” by USC’s actions, Dr. Brenner told The Chronicle. “It is extraordinary for one university to sue another,” Randolph W. Hall, vice president for research at USC, said in response.

NIH Approval Needed

To make its point, USC listed several other instances in which larger center grants from the NIH were peacefully transferred between institutions after a faculty member’s move. UC-San Diego answered by citing a series of ways the Alzheimer’s project differed from the suggested comparisons, including the study’s size — its latest clinical trial is expected to include 1,000 participants — and its 24-year history at San Diego.

UC-San Diego was especially aggrieved by what it regarded as the secretive nature of USC’s recruitment of Dr. Aisen. “USC engaged in months of negotiations with Dr. Aisen as if the ADCS were Dr. Aisen’s personal property, without any attempt to communicate with UC-San Diego in advance,” said Gary S. Firestein, associate vice chancellor and dean of translational medicine at UC-San Diego. USC, in turn, said that it does not seek the entire Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study from UC-San Diego, and would be happy to discuss a resolution without involving the courts.

ADVERTISEMENT

For now, the study is staying at UC-San Diego. The NIH must approve any transfer of the grant to a new institution, said Vicky Cahan, a spokeswoman for the National Institute on Aging, the NIH division that awarded the grant. The NIH also must approve a replacement when a grant’s lead researcher leaves, and it is now in the process of working on that with UC-San Diego, Ms. Cahan said.

The NIH would like to “ensure that operations of the ADCS network continue as seamlessly as possible,” she said.

On the issue of data rights, Ms. Cahan said she could not comment on the specific case, but reiterated that NIH grant recipients are institutions rather than individuals, and that the recipients generally own the rights to the data.

Paul Basken covers university research and its intersection with government policy. He can be found on Twitter @pbasken, or reached by email at paul.basken@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Paul Basken Bio
About the Author
Paul Basken
Paul Basken was a government policy and science reporter with The Chronicle of Higher Education, where he won an annual National Press Club award for exclusives.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Boom in Academic Poaching Is Fueled by Visions of Economic Development

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Photo illustration of Elon Musk and the Dome of the U.S. Capitol
The Review | Opinion
On Student Aid, It’s Congressional Republicans vs. DOGE
By Robert Gordon, Jordan Matsudaira
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a blue-toned eye with a small hand either pushing or pulling a red piece of film over the top
The Review | Essay
We Don’t Need More Administrators Inspecting Our Ideas
By Nicolas Langlitz
Solomon-0512 B.jpg
The Review | Essay
The Conscience of a Campus Conservative
By Daniel J. Solomon

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin