> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Group Endorses Principles for Ranking Universities

By  Burton Bollag
June 9, 2006

An international group of educators, higher-education experts, and publishers that met in Berlin last month has come up with a set of principles for ranking colleges and universities.

The 16 principles of good practice, dubbed the “Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions,” are a response to the explosion of college rankings in many countries since U.S. News & World Report published the first such listings in 1983.

College rankings — or league tables, as they are known in Britain — were at first widely dismissed in academe, but they appear to be popular with students and their parents.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

An international group of educators, higher-education experts, and publishers that met in Berlin last month has come up with a set of principles for ranking colleges and universities.

The 16 principles of good practice, dubbed the “Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions,” are a response to the explosion of college rankings in many countries since U.S. News & World Report published the first such listings in 1983.

College rankings — or league tables, as they are known in Britain — were at first widely dismissed in academe, but they appear to be popular with students and their parents.

The Berlin principles are meant to serve as voluntary guidelines for groups that produce rankings.

In a statement accompanying the list of principles, the group wrote that the purpose of the guidelines was to ensure that “those producing rankings and league tables hold themselves accountable for quality in their own data collection, methodology, and dissemination.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Jamie P. Merisotis, president of the Institute for Higher Education Policy, an independent group based in Washington, called the principles “the beginnings of a self-regulatory process.”

More Transparency

Among the principles are recommendations that rankings should: Recognize the diversity of institutions and take the different missions and goals of institutions into account; be transparent regarding the methodology used for creating the rankings’ measure outcomes, such as retention and graduation rates, in preference to inputs, such as entrance-examination scores, whenever possible; and offer consumers a choice in how rankings are displayed, such as by allowing them to determine how factors are weighed on interactive Web sites.

The meeting, which was attended by 47 people from a dozen countries, was organized by Mr. Merisotis’s group and the Unesco-European Centre for Higher Education, which is based in Bucharest, Romania.

‘Some Corrections’

ADVERTISEMENT

Jan Sadlak, director of the Unesco Centre, said the principles were meant to improve what many academic leaders see as the superficial and capricious nature of rankings. “If we’re going to have to live with it, let’s do it in the least destructive way,” he said.

Robert J. Morse, who directs the college rankings at U.S. News & World Report and attended the Berlin meeting, says the publication has continually improved its ranking system over the past two decades.

For example, criteria have been shifted to give more emphasis to outcomes and less to input measures.

A more recent ranking system, run by the Institute of Higher Education, at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, in China, is considered the most influential international ranking. It has been criticized for giving too much emphasis to Nobel Prizes won by faculty members, even decades earlier.

Officials at the Chinese institute are paying attention to those concerns, said Mr. Sadlak, of Unesco. “There will be some corrections.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Another meeting, set for the fall of 2007 in Shanghai, will focus on the idea of establishing a system of certification of rankings that follow principles of good practice.


http://chronicle.com Section: International Volume 52, Issue 40, Page A40

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
International
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin