Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
News

Group Endorses Principles for Ranking Universities

By Burton Bollag June 9, 2006

An international group of educators, higher-education experts, and publishers that met in Berlin last month has come up with a set of principles for ranking colleges and universities.

The 16 principles of good practice, dubbed the “Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions,” are a response to the explosion of college rankings in many countries since U.S. News & World Report published the first such listings in 1983.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

An international group of educators, higher-education experts, and publishers that met in Berlin last month has come up with a set of principles for ranking colleges and universities.

The 16 principles of good practice, dubbed the “Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions,” are a response to the explosion of college rankings in many countries since U.S. News & World Report published the first such listings in 1983.

College rankings — or league tables, as they are known in Britain — were at first widely dismissed in academe, but they appear to be popular with students and their parents.

The Berlin principles are meant to serve as voluntary guidelines for groups that produce rankings.

In a statement accompanying the list of principles, the group wrote that the purpose of the guidelines was to ensure that “those producing rankings and league tables hold themselves accountable for quality in their own data collection, methodology, and dissemination.”

Jamie P. Merisotis, president of the Institute for Higher Education Policy, an independent group based in Washington, called the principles “the beginnings of a self-regulatory process.”

More Transparency

Among the principles are recommendations that rankings should: Recognize the diversity of institutions and take the different missions and goals of institutions into account; be transparent regarding the methodology used for creating the rankings’ measure outcomes, such as retention and graduation rates, in preference to inputs, such as entrance-examination scores, whenever possible; and offer consumers a choice in how rankings are displayed, such as by allowing them to determine how factors are weighed on interactive Web sites.

The meeting, which was attended by 47 people from a dozen countries, was organized by Mr. Merisotis’s group and the Unesco-European Centre for Higher Education, which is based in Bucharest, Romania.

‘Some Corrections’

Jan Sadlak, director of the Unesco Centre, said the principles were meant to improve what many academic leaders see as the superficial and capricious nature of rankings. “If we’re going to have to live with it, let’s do it in the least destructive way,” he said.

Robert J. Morse, who directs the college rankings at U.S. News & World Report and attended the Berlin meeting, says the publication has continually improved its ranking system over the past two decades.

ADVERTISEMENT

For example, criteria have been shifted to give more emphasis to outcomes and less to input measures.

A more recent ranking system, run by the Institute of Higher Education, at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, in China, is considered the most influential international ranking. It has been criticized for giving too much emphasis to Nobel Prizes won by faculty members, even decades earlier.

Officials at the Chinese institute are paying attention to those concerns, said Mr. Sadlak, of Unesco. “There will be some corrections.”

Another meeting, set for the fall of 2007 in Shanghai, will focus on the idea of establishing a system of certification of rankings that follow principles of good practice.


http://chronicle.com Section: International Volume 52, Issue 40, Page A40

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
International
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Access & Affordability
Congressional Republicans Want to End Grad PLUS Loans. How Might It Affect Your Campus?
Florida Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, Jr. delivers remarks during the State Board of Education meeting at Winter Park High School, Wednesday, March 27, 2024.
Executive Privilege
In Florida, University Presidents’ Pay Goes Up. Is Politics to Blame?

From The Review

Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Rise of a New Ed Tech Buzzword
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
The Review | Opinion
What RFK Jr. Got Right About Academic Publishing
By Robert M. Kaplan

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin