Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
The Scene in the Courtroom

Guilty Verdict Puts a Dark Coda on Spanier’s Fall

By Jack Stripling March 24, 2017
Harrisburg, Pa.
Graham Spanier leaves the Dauphin County Courthouse, in Harrisburg, Pa., on Friday. The former Penn State president, charged in connection with Jerry Sandusky’s sexual abuse, was found guilty on one count of endangering the welfare of children, but not guilty on two other charges.
Graham Spanier leaves the Dauphin County Courthouse, in Harrisburg, Pa., on Friday. The former Penn State president, charged in connection with Jerry Sandusky’s sexual abuse, was found guilty on one count of endangering the welfare of children, but not guilty on two other charges.Matt Rourke, AP Images

Graham B. Spanier, the former president of Pennsylvania State University, endangered children whom he should have protected.

After more than 12 hours of deliberations over two days, a jury on Friday found Mr. Spanier guilty of one misdemeanor count of endangering the welfare of children. He was found not guilty on two other charges, including criminal conspiracy and an additional count of child endangerment.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Graham Spanier leaves the Dauphin County Courthouse, in Harrisburg, Pa., on Friday. The former Penn State president, charged in connection with Jerry Sandusky’s sexual abuse, was found guilty on one count of endangering the welfare of children, but not guilty on two other charges.
Graham Spanier leaves the Dauphin County Courthouse, in Harrisburg, Pa., on Friday. The former Penn State president, charged in connection with Jerry Sandusky’s sexual abuse, was found guilty on one count of endangering the welfare of children, but not guilty on two other charges.Matt Rourke, AP Images

Graham B. Spanier, the former president of Pennsylvania State University, endangered children whom he should have protected.

After more than 12 hours of deliberations over two days, a jury on Friday found Mr. Spanier guilty of one misdemeanor count of endangering the welfare of children. He was found not guilty on two other charges, including criminal conspiracy and an additional count of child endangerment.

Paterno Statue-Carousel
Penn State Scandal
This selection of articles from The Chronicle’s archives looks back on the Jerry Sandusky scandal and its fallout at Pennsylvania State University.
  • With Last-Minute Ruling, Graham Spanier Evades Jumpsuit and ‘Hard Cell’
  • Seeking Closure in Verdict, Penn State Finds More Discord
  • Spanier’s Conviction Highlights Lessons of Sandusky Scandal
  • Spanier Is Found Guilty of Child Endangerment in Sandusky Sex-Abuse Case
  • Spanier Trial Closes With Appeal to Moral Outrage

The crime of which Mr. Spanier was convicted is punishable by a maximum of five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. But Mr. Spanier, who plans to appeal, could have faced far worse. The charge of child endangerment, which can be a felony, was downgraded to a misdemeanor because the jury did not find that the crime represented a pattern of conduct by Mr. Spanier.

The case against Mr. Spanier, argued here this week in Dauphin County Court, hinged on whether the former president and his lieutenants had failed to protect young children who were sexually assaulted on Penn State’s campus by Jerry Sandusky, a former Nittany Lions assistant football coach.

Friday’s verdict placed a dark coda on a nationally significant case that, at its heart, functioned as an indictment of the leadership and judgment of a highly respected former college administrator who prosecutors argued had been blinded by hubris and an unyielding desire to protect his reputation at the expense of young boys.

“Graham Spanier was corrupted by his own power,” Laura Ditka, Pennsylvania’s chief deputy attorney general, who led the prosecution, said in closing arguments on Thursday. “He was a leader that failed to lead.”

Graham Spanier was corrupted by his own power. He was a leader that failed to lead.

The case has impeded closure for Penn State, a major research university that has never fully recovered from a saga that joined sexual abuse and big-time college sports. It was the lure of Nittany Lions football, prosecutors asserted, that allowed Mr. Sandusky to groom and ensnare his victims, whom he sexually abused in Penn State facilities.

ADVERTISEMENT

To protect that big brand, prosecutors said, Mr. Spanier agreed with a plan not to alert the authorities, in 2001, when Mr. Sandusky was spotted naked with a boy in a Penn State locker-room shower. That decision, the verdict suggests, allowed Mr. Sandusky to abuse more children for a decade before his arrest, in 2011.

Mr. Sandusky is serving a prison sentence of 30 to 60 years on charges related to the sexual abuse of 10 boys.

Prosecutors did not say on Friday whether they would seek jail time for Mr. Spanier.

The jury, consisting of seven women and five men, gave the case lengthy and apparently detailed consideration, returning to the courtroom on a few occasions to ask highly technical questions about the language of the charges. At one point, they asked that an entire piece of testimony be read aloud to them in open court.

ADVERTISEMENT

Judge John A. Boccabella told them, at the trial’s conclusion, that he did not recall a jury ever asking more-intelligent questions about a case.

Raw Nerves

Mr. Spanier was stoic throughout the trial, and he remained expressionless as the jury’s foreman read the verdict. He said nothing to members of the news media after the trial, remaining silent as a Chronicle reporter asked whether he had anything to say to the victims.

The verdict exposed raw nerves among Mr. Spanier’s supporters, including a number of Penn State trustees who attended the trial. Albert L. Lord, a member of the university’s board, was visibly frustrated by the verdict, and he admonished the Chronicle reporter for asking Mr. Spanier about the abuse victims, calling the query wildly inappropriate and disrespectful.

He’s a man of integrity. I wish I could say the same thing for the prosecution.

Mr. Lord’s views reflect those of the former president’s core group of allies, who say that Mr. Spanier was unjustly scapegoated and that they refuse to accept the verdict as just.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He’s a man of integrity,” Mr. Lord said. “I wish I could say the same thing for the prosecution. That show that Laura Ditka put on yesterday, it was an embarrassment to the American legal system.”

Since his firing, in 2011, Mr. Spanier has maintained his innocence, declining a plea bargain that would have dropped all felony charges. Timothy M. Curley, Penn State’s former athletics director, and Gary C. Schultz, a former vice president for finance and business, both took misdemeanor-level plea deals rather than face the serious charges that Mr. Spanier battled in court.

Mr. Spanier, a prominent figure in the world of college and university leadership, became a pariah in the course of the Sandusky scandal. He has been on paid administrative leave from Penn State since November 2012, and he is now suing the university he once led for breach of contract.

The trial opened a window onto Mr. Spanier’s complicated legacy, as both a man beloved by those who see him as falsely accused and abandoned by colleagues whom he worked with over 16 years as president.

ADVERTISEMENT

Throughout the trial, Mr. Spanier’s wife, Sandra Spanier, an English professor at Penn State, and his son, Brian Spanier, looked on from the gallery’s front row. Supporters stayed in area hotels, night after night, and waited grueling hours in the hallways of the courthouse, sitting on floors and wooden benches, as the jury deliberated.

But the spectacle was as intriguing for who was not present as who was. Rodney A. Erickson, who served for many years as Mr. Spanier’s provost and who succeeded him as Penn State’s president, never showed up in court. Nor did Eric J. Barron, the university’s current president. Nor did it appear that any members of Penn State’s board, save those elected to positions for alumni, attended the trial.

In a statement on Friday that was not attributed to any specific Penn State official, the university appeared to distance itself from Mr. Spanier and his colleagues.

“Penn State has extraordinary expectations of our leaders, who must set and maintain the example for reporting, ethics, and compliance that reflect best practices,” the statement read. “In the view of the jury, with respect to Spanier, and by their own admission, as to Curley and Schultz, these former leaders fell short.”

A Blistering Statement

Louis J. Freeh, who led an independent investigation that culminated five years ago in a 267-page report on Penn State’s handling of the Sandusky case, issued a two-page statement in the wake of Friday’s verdict that tore into the university’s leadership and called on President Barron to resign.

ADVERTISEMENT

The statement seems almost certain to escalate efforts by a cohort of trustees to expose what they see as flaws and unfounded assertions in Mr. Freeh’s report. Several trustees, who were elected to the board on platforms critical of the investigation, successfully sued the university for access to all of the documents that Mr. Freeh and his team composed or reviewed to produce their report. The trustees are not permitted to discuss their findings in detail without full board approval, but several have hinted privately that they are disturbed by what they have seen.

Whether Mr. Freeh’s statement will compel the trustees to release information they may have uncovered remains an open question.

The biggest opposition to releasing the Freeh materials to the trustees came from Mr. Barron, who blasted his own board members for suing the university for the information. A spokesman for the president did not immediately respond to questions about whether Mr. Barron would be any more inclined to release the materials in light of Mr. Freeh’s statement.

Mr. Barron has long maintained that the materials could not be released without revealing the identities of whistle-blowers, who he says had a reasonable expectation of anonymity.

ADVERTISEMENT

John S. Nichols, a close friend of Mr. Spanier’s and a professor emeritus of communications and international affairs at Penn State, described the trial as part of a long and difficult process that, he said, would end with a successful appeal that proves Mr. Spanier is not a criminal. But so much damage, Mr. Nichols said, has already been done.

“It’s taken away,” he said, “one of the best careers in higher education without justification.”

Jack Stripling covers college leadership, particularly presidents and governing boards. Follow him on Twitter @jackstripling, or email him at jack.stripling@chronicle.com.

Editor’s note (3/25/2017, 2:05 p.m.): This article has been updated to include information about Mr. Freeh’s statement following Friday’s verdict.

Read other items in Penn State Scandal.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Leadership & Governance
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
stripling-jack.jpg
About the Author
Jack Stripling
Jack Stripling is a senior writer at The Chronicle and host of its podcast, College Matters from The Chronicle. Follow him on Twitter @jackstripling.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Penn State’s Response to Abuse Day by Day

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin