Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Admissions

Harvard Admissions Trial Opens With Arguments Focused on Diversity

By Nell Gluckman October 15, 2018
Boston

Updated (10/15/2018, 5:36 p.m.) with testimony from Harvard’s dean of admissions and other details of Monday’s proceedings.

Harvard University defended its race-conscious admissions policy in a crowded courtroom in Boston on Monday, pushing back against claims that it discriminates against Asian-American applicants. It was the first day of a trial that has come to represent that latest front in the country’s fight over affirmative action in college admissions.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Updated (10/15/2018, 5:36 p.m.) with testimony from Harvard’s dean of admissions and other details of Monday’s proceedings.

Harvard University defended its race-conscious admissions policy in a crowded courtroom in Boston on Monday, pushing back against claims that it discriminates against Asian-American applicants. It was the first day of a trial that has come to represent that latest front in the country’s fight over affirmative action in college admissions.

The university was accused of balancing its undergraduate classes to ensure that it had admitted its desired share of students of each race and ethnicity. Adam K. Mortara, a lawyer representing Students for Fair Admissions, the plaintiff, also said Harvard penalized Asian-American applicants by systematically giving them lower scores on a metric admissions officers use to measure personality.

Mortara explained that Harvard gives applicants a numerical score in four categories: academic achievement, athletic ability, extracurriculars, and personality. He told the judge, Allison D. Burroughs of the Federal District Court, that if she agreed with him on one point, it should be that race influences the scores admissions officers give to applicants on the personality rating.

Students for Fair Admissions’ case against Harvard is not an attempt to do away with affirmative action, Mortara said, but an opportunity to take a close look at the private university’s once-secretive process and conclude that it is unfair. During his opening argument, he analyzed admissions data and explained why the judge should conclude that the data show that Asian-American applicants are admitted at lower rates despite their higher performance in the academic-achievement category.

“Diversity is not on trial here,” he said.

A Packed Courtroom

But Harvard’s lawyer, William F. Lee, disagreed. In his opening statement, he said that the university does consider race in its admissions process, but that applicants are not accepted or denied admission because of their race. Race is one factor of many in “a system full of checks and balances,” he said.

The numerical ratings students receive early in the admissions process are later used by admissions officers to evaluate some 40,000 applications. Those numbers “triage” the applicants, he said, and they are part of a long and complex process. In the end a committee of about 40 people discusses and votes on the applicants in an attempt to admit a class that is diverse in many ways.

The university “cannot achieve educational goals without considering race,” said Lee, who is a Harvard graduate. He closed with a story about his own experience as an Asian-American lawyer, recalling that early in his career he argued a case in a federal courthouse in Boston where only men were present and he was the only one who was not white.

He gestured to the courtroom behind him and said, “It could not look more different today.”

That’s because of the efforts of colleges across the country that have committed to admitting diverse classes, he said, concluding that there is still work to be done.

The U.S. Justice Department, under Attorney General Jeff Sessions (shown with President Trump, left), said in a leaked memo that it was seeking lawyers to conduct “investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.”
Race-Conscious Admissions Returns to the Spotlight
Barely a year after the U.S. Supreme Court appeared to issue its final word on this form of affirmative action, the issue is back, following a Justice Department memo that seemed to promise Trump-administration investigations of colleges. Here’s all of The Chronicle’s coverage.
  • Harvard Doesn’t Discriminate Against Asian American Applicants, U.S. Appeals Court Rules

Harvard students and representatives of alumni associations have also been allowed to testify in the trial. In their opening statements on Monday, lawyers for those groups stressed the importance of race-conscious admissions. They said that their clients’ racial identities could not be divorced from who they are as people and who they were as applicants to Harvard.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A colorblind approach means that you close your eyes to the full lived experiences of applicants,” said Jennifer Holmes, a lawyer with the NAACP.

The courtroom was packed, with some observers in an overflow room. Current and former top officials at Harvard were in the audience, including Catherine G. (Drew) Faust, the immediate past president; William R. Fitzsimmons, dean of admissions; and Rakesh Khurana, dean of Harvard College, the university’s undergraduate division. Edward J. Blum, the conservative activist who is president and founder of Students for Fair Admissions, was also there.

Heated Back-and-Forth

The first person to take the stand on Monday was Fitzsimmons, who has served as the admissions dean since 1986 and has worked at Harvard for much longer. He was asked by John M. Hughes, also a lawyer for Students for Fair Admissions, about letters that are sent to students across the country to encourage them to apply to Harvard. Admissions officers try to target high-school students who score high on the PSAT, Fitzsimmons testified, and those in areas that are less well-represented at Harvard, such as the Midwest.

The Harvard officials also know, in some cases, the ethnicity of those students. In a heated back-and-forth, Hughes asked Fitzsimmons whether students’ race affects the PSAT score they need to have earned in order to receive a recruitment letter from Harvard. White students from underrepresented areas need to achieve a lower score than do Asian students from the same areas in order to get a letter, Hughes argued.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The only reason that Harvard doesn’t invite an Asian student with 1310” from a less well-represented area, Hughes said, “and does invite a white student with 1310 is race.”

Fitzsimmons repeatedly tried to add nuance to that line of argument, saying that the letters are a recruitment tool and do not determine who is admitted.

Reaching out to prospective students across the nation, or ‘race discrimination, plain and simple’?

“We are simply trying to reach out to people from all over the nation,” he said. Hughes called the practice “race discrimination, plain and simple.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Fitzsimmons will continue to testify on Tuesday, and will be followed by other Harvard officials. Both sides are expected to call expert witnesses who have run statistical analyses of six years of Harvard admissions data.

If Monday was any indication, the trial is likely to include a lot of discussion about the best way to conduct such an analysis. Lawyers on both sides are already making different arguments about whether applicants who are the children of Harvard alumni and applicants who are recruited for sports teams should be included in that analysis. Harvard says all students should be included in the data.

Nell Gluckman writes about faculty issues and other topics in higher education. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.

Read other items in Harvard on Trial.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gluckman_Nell.jpg
About the Author
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Harvard’s Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Goes on Trial on Monday. Here’s What to Expect.
Will Students Testify in the Case Against Harvard’s Race-Conscious Admissions Procedures?
Justice Dept. Slams Harvard Admissions in Affirmative-Action Filing
In Court Battle Over Harvard Admissions, Plaintiffs Allege University Ignored ‘Negative Effects’ on Asian-Americans

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin