Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
News

Harvard Faculty Votes No Confidence in the University’s President

By Piper Fogg March 16, 2005

Harvard University’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences voted no confidence in the university’s president, Lawrence H. Summers, on Tuesday.

The vote was 218 to 185, with 18 abstentions. Mr. Summers said after the vote that he planned to continue in his post and to work with the faculty.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Harvard University’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences voted no confidence in the university’s president, Lawrence H. Summers, on Tuesday.

The vote was 218 to 185, with 18 abstentions. Mr. Summers said after the vote that he planned to continue in his post and to work with the faculty.

The faculty also voted 253 to 137, with 18 abstentions, for a separate and milder motion that amounts to a censure of Mr. Summers for his recent controversial remarks that women may have innate differences of ability from men, as well as for his leadership style. Both votes were by secret ballot.

The no-confidence vote is unprecedented in Harvard’s history. It is a culmination of nearly two months of faculty frustration with Harvard’s leader, whom professors have criticized for what they say is his aggressive and alienating leadership style.

“It was quite dramatic,” said Mary Waters, chair of the sociology department, who voted for both measures but was surprised at the success of the no-confidence vote, which was not expected to pass. “There was an audible gasp when the numbers were announced.”

Claudia Goldin, an economics professor who voted against the no-confidence motion, said she was also surprised -- and disappointed. “This has eaten up a lot of productive time,” she said.

The no-confidence resolution was proposed by J. Lorand Matory, a professor of anthropology and of African and African-American studies, several days before Tuesday’s monthly faculty meeting. It states: “The faculty lacks confidence in the leadership of Lawrence H. Summers.”

The vote may be largely symbolic because the seven-member Harvard Corporation is the only entity that can remove Mr. Summers from the presidency. The board has already come out in support of him. But Mr. Matory called on Mr. Summers to resign, according to the student newspaper, The Harvard Crimson, telling reporters outside the meeting at the Loeb Drama Center: “There is no noble alternative to resignation.”

Mr. Summers has been under fire since a January scholarly meeting, sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research, at which he said that one reason why few women make it to the top tiers in mathematics and science could be the innate differences in ability between women and men (The Chronicle, January 28).

The second motion approved by the Harvard faculty was put forth by Theda Skocpol, a professor of government and sociology. It says: “The faculty regrets the president’s mid-January statements about women in science and the adverse consequences of those statements for individuals and for Harvard; and the faculty also regrets aspects of the president’s managerial approach as discussed in recent meetings of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It goes on to say: “The faculty appreciates the president’s stated intent to address these issues, and seeks to meet the challenges facing Harvard in ways that are collegial and consistent with longstanding faculty responsibilities in institutional governance.”

Some scholars, as well as several presidents of elite universities, have criticized Mr. Summers for advancing what they say are harmful and false stereotypes about women. Still other professors inside and outside Harvard have praised Mr. Summers for sparking scholarly discussion about the issue (The Chronicle, March 4).

Tuesday’s session was the third meeting of Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences that focused on Mr. Summers’s comments and his managerial style. He has apologized several times for his remarks, set up two committees to focus on the representation of women at the university, and expressed a willingness to “temper” his words and work with the faculty to create a more open environment.

A group of students, calling themselves Harvard Students for Larry, released a statement on Tuesday saying it was “extremely disappointed” with the faculty for approving both measures.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This demonstrates a complete rejection of the major tenets of academic freedom and wholesale disregard for the opinion of the student body they instruct,” the statement said, noting that nearly 600 Harvard students have signed a statement, originally published as an editorial in the Crimson on February 18, in support of President Summers.

But Ms. Waters said that there was widespread dissatisfaction with the president among professors. “I don’t wish this on anybody,” she said.

Nevertheless, she defended her vote for the no-confidence measure. “I don’t think he’s the right person for the job,” she said.

After the meeting, according to the Associated Press, Mr. Summers said, “As I said to the faculty, I have tried these last couple months to listen to all that has been said, to learn from it, and to move forward, and that’s what I’m going to do.”

Background articles from The Chronicle:

  • Where’s Larry? (3/4/2005)
  • Primed for Numbers (3/4/2005)
  • Mr. Summers’s Views Fuel Bias, Peers Say (2/25/2005)
  • Harvard Creates 2 Panels to Advance Female Professors (2/18/2005)
  • The Long Winter of Mr. Summers (2/11/2005)
  • Harvard’s President Wonders Aloud About Women in Science and Math (1/28/2005)
  • Where the Elite Teach, It’s Still a Man’s World (12/3/2004)
  • Female Professors Say Harvard Is Not Granting Tenure to Enough Women (10/1/2004)

Opinion:

  • Clueless in Academe (3/4/2005)
  • Can Harvard Ever Play a Positive Role for Women in Higher Education? (2/4/2005)
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin