Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Admissions

Harvard Is Challenged on Whether Socioeconomic Status Should Replace Race as Admissions Factor

By Nell Gluckman October 22, 2018
As a trial in Boston entered its second week, a higher-education expert testified that Harvard U. could achieve its desired racial diversity without considering race in admissions.
As a trial in Boston entered its second week, a higher-education expert testified that Harvard U. could achieve its desired racial diversity without considering race in admissions.Getty Images

The question of whether Harvard University could use socioeconomic status instead of race in admissions, and still achieve the diversity it seeks, was debated here on Monday in a federal courtroom. It was the start of the second week of a trial that has forced Harvard to defend itself against claims that it discriminates against Asian-American applicants.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

As a trial in Boston entered its second week, a higher-education expert testified that Harvard U. could achieve its desired racial diversity without considering race in admissions.
As a trial in Boston entered its second week, a higher-education expert testified that Harvard U. could achieve its desired racial diversity without considering race in admissions.Getty Images

The question of whether Harvard University could use socioeconomic status instead of race in admissions, and still achieve the diversity it seeks, was debated here on Monday in a federal courtroom. It was the start of the second week of a trial that has forced Harvard to defend itself against claims that it discriminates against Asian-American applicants.

Two new witnesses were asked about the issue: Richard D. Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation, who testified for the plaintiffs, Students for Fair Admissions; and Rakesh Khurana, dean of Harvard College, the university’s undergraduate division.

A lawyer representing Students for Fair Admissions, Adam K. Mortara, showed Khurana data suggesting that about 30 percent of Harvard undergraduates come from households that earn $150,000 or more annually. Mortara asked if the university’s student body should better reflect the socioeconomic makeup of the United States.

“What is so special about wealthy people that Harvard needs to have them overrepresented?” he asked Khurana. The dean responded that all of the university’s students are qualified to be there.

Rakesh Khurana, dean of Harvard College
Rakesh Khurana, dean of Harvard CollegeMichael Kovac, Getty Images for Elton John AIDS Foundation

Students for Fair Admissions, which sued Harvard in 2014, was created by Edward J. Blum, a conservative activist who has challenged affirmative action at several universities. The group has alleged that Harvard discriminates against Asian-American students in its admissions process.

Still, there wasn’t much talk of Asian-American students in court on Monday. Kahlenberg spoke about several models that economists had created to determine whom Harvard would admit if it considered different factors than it does today. He has argued in several books and “hundreds of articles” that colleges should use socioeconomic status, not race, to diversify their classes.

Kahlenberg said the models showed that Harvard would still be racially diverse if admissions officials did not consider the race of applicants, but gave a greater preference to applicants from low-income families.

Richard Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation
Richard Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at the Century FoundationMichael Loccisano, Getty Images for The New York Times

In each of the models he reviewed, the portion of African-American students admitted declined, from 14 percent to 10 percent or lower. The number of white applicants admitted stayed the same — at 40 percent — or decreased, and the number of Asian-American admittees increased, from 24 percent to around 30 percent. The number of Latino and Latina applicants either stayed the same — at 14 percent — or rose slightly. The portion of economically disadvantaged students grew from 18 percent to roughly 50 percent in each of the models.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Socioeconomic diversity at Harvard,” Kahlenberg said, “is deeply lacking.”

‘The Bigger Picture’

One of Harvard’s lawyers, William F. Lee, emphasized that Kahlenberg had been paid by Students for Fair Admissions, not only to testify on Monday but also as a consultant when the organization was drafting its original complaint, in 2014. He noted that Kahlenberg has known Blum since 2003.

“You have a mutual interest in affirmative action?” Lee asked. “And you understand Mr. Blum’s aim is to eliminate affirmative action?” Kahlenberg agreed. He’d said earlier in his testimony that race should be considered only as “a last resort” if other factors fail to increase diversity.

About 200 students, alumni, and employees of Harvard U. gathered in Harvard Square on October 14, 2018, as a lawsuit challenging the university’s use of race in admissions was about to open in federal court in Boston.
Harvard on Trial
Detailed background on the lawsuit over the university’s race-conscious admissions policy, the case’s implications for selective colleges, and coverage of the trial as it unfolded, in a federal court in Boston.
  • Harvard Doesn’t Discriminate Against Asian American Applicants, U.S. Appeals Court Rules
  • 3 Takeaways From the Appeal of the Harvard Admissions Lawsuit
  • A Judge Advised Harvard to Give Its Admissions Officers Training to Stop Bias. Will That Help?

Lee noted that, in every model, the portion of African-American students drops when race-neutral alternatives are used. Kahlenberg responded that a variety of factors contribute to diversity and the educational benefits that diversity can bring to a campus.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t look at one tiny aspect of the bigger picture,” he said.

A Harvard committee — made up of Khurana; William R. Fitzsimmons, dean of admissions; and Michael D. Smith, then the dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences — analyzed the models created by the economists. In a report published in April 2018, the committee concluded that “no workable race-neutral admissions practices” would allow the university to achieve the racial diversity it wants while maintaining academic standards.

“If Harvard were to greatly increase the weight given to socioeconomic circumstances in the manner discussed above, it would run a significant risk of diminishing the academic excellence of the class,” the report said. Kahlenberg said he thought the Harvard report was not convincing.

Lee argued that Kahlenberg’s testimony was not credible because he had made up his mind about affirmative action and race-conscious admissions long before he reviewed the economists’ models.

ADVERTISEMENT

The day after Students for Fair Admissions filed suit, in 2014, Kahlenberg told Fox News that the evidence suggests Harvard discriminates against Asian-Americans, Lee pointed out. At Lee’s prompting, Kahlenberg also said that he’d made up his mind about the issue back when he was a student at Harvard, in the 1980s.

In a minor development on Monday, the judge, Allison D. Burroughs of the Federal District Court, addressed concerns raised by a weekend email, sent to lawyers working on the case and several reporters, asserting that Burroughs had applied but was not admitted to Harvard even though her father, Warren H. Burroughs, was a graduate. The email suggested that she was therefore biased. Lawyers for both sides expressed confidence in her ability to fairly try the case. The judge disclosed her Harvard-application experience before the trial opened.

Khurana will continue testifying on Tuesday.

Nell Gluckman writes about faculty issues and other topics in higher education. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the November 2, 2018, issue.
Read other items in Harvard on Trial.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Race
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gluckman_Nell.jpg
About the Author
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.
Tufts University student from Turkey, Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested by immigration agents while walking along a street in a Boston suburb, talks to reporters on arriving back in Boston, Saturday, May 10, 2025, a day after she was released from a Louisiana immigration detention center on the orders of a federal judge. (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi)
Law & Policy
Homeland Security Agents Detail Run-Up to High-Profile Arrests of Pro-Palestinian Scholars
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Financial aid
The End of Unlimited Grad-School Loans Could Leave Some Colleges and Students in the Lurch

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin