Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Admissions

Harvard Officials, Accused of Racial Bias, Defend Their Admissions Policy

By Nell Gluckman October 19, 2018
Boston
Lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions, the organization suing Harvard, have said that “affirmative action is not on trial,” but in parts of their argument on Friday they seemed to be making a case against any consideration of race in admissions.
Lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions, the organization suing Harvard, have said that “affirmative action is not on trial,” but in parts of their argument on Friday they seemed to be making a case against any consideration of race in admissions.Steven Senne, AP Images

One week into a trial challenging Harvard University’s use of race in admissions decisions, the strategies of each side are starting to come into focus.

Students for Fair Admissions, the group that sued the university in 2014, has sought to show that Harvard admissions officials try to admit target numbers of students in different racial and ethnic groups. Lawyers for the organization have tried to use data compiled by the university’s Office of Institutional Research and testimony by Harvard officials to show that Asian-American applicants are penalized in personal ratings given by admissions officials. On Friday they tried to make the case that Harvard College’s director of admissions had a bias against Asian-Americans.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions, the organization suing Harvard, have said that “affirmative action is not on trial,” but in parts of their argument on Friday they seemed to be making a case against any consideration of race in admissions.
Lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions, the organization suing Harvard, have said that “affirmative action is not on trial,” but in parts of their argument on Friday they seemed to be making a case against any consideration of race in admissions.Steven Senne, AP Images

One week into a trial challenging Harvard University’s use of race in admissions decisions, the strategies of each side are starting to come into focus.

Students for Fair Admissions, the group that sued the university in 2014, has sought to show that Harvard admissions officials try to admit target numbers of students in different racial and ethnic groups. Lawyers for the organization have tried to use data compiled by the university’s Office of Institutional Research and testimony by Harvard officials to show that Asian-American applicants are penalized in personal ratings given by admissions officials. On Friday they tried to make the case that Harvard College’s director of admissions had a bias against Asian-Americans.

The university vehemently denies those claims. Its lawyers have argued that the data being presented does not show the full picture of how the admissions office works. Harvard officials have said that they do consider applicants’ race when evaluating them — it’s not something that can be divorced from a person’s life experience, they say. But they insist that they never consider it a negative factor.

About 200 students, alumni, and employees of Harvard U. gathered in Harvard Square on October 14, 2018, as a lawsuit challenging the university’s use of race in admissions was about to open in federal court in Boston.
Harvard on Trial
Detailed background on the lawsuit over the university’s race-conscious admissions policy, the case’s implications for selective colleges, and coverage of the trial as it unfolded, in a federal court in Boston.
  • Harvard Doesn’t Discriminate Against Asian American Applicants, U.S. Appeals Court Rules
  • 3 Takeaways From the Appeal of the Harvard Admissions Lawsuit
  • A Judge Advised Harvard to Give Its Admissions Officers Training to Stop Bias. Will That Help?

However the judge rules, the case is likely to be appealed, and may end up before the U.S. Supreme Count, which could issue a decision that significantly challenges many colleges’ use of affirmative action. Lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions have said that “affirmative action is not on trial,” but in parts of their argument on Friday they seemed to be making a case against any consideration of race in admissions.

Adam K. Mortara, a lawyer for the organization, questioned Marlyn E. McGrath, director of admissions for Harvard College, the university’s undergraduate division, about how race and religion are considered in admissions.

“Harvard does not track the religious identity of applicants, do you?” Mortara said. At his prompting, McGrath explained that when applicants check a box on the Common Application indicating their religion, that information is not seen by Harvard admissions officials. She said that practice had been established on the advice of Harvard’s lawyers. But if applicants disclose their religion elsewhere in their application, she said, Harvard officials would know about it.

Mortara asked McGrath if that lack of information was an obstacle in evaluating an applicant. She said it was not.

“Would you consider it to be a disadvantage if you could not consider their race?” he asked. McGrath said it would.

Confounding a Stereotype

Mortara also showed the court emails between McGrath and her daughter, who was an alumni interviewer for Harvard. The emails were heavily redacted, but one suggested that the top students admitted from Utah were of Asian descent.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sending this along for your amusement. Pure Utah,” McGrath wrote to her daughter. When asked why she thought it was amusing, McGrath said that it “confounds the stereotype that many people have of Utah.”

Lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions also asked questions about other communications. In one letter McGrath responded politely to an older Harvard alumnus who had suggested limiting the admission of Japanese students. And in another email exchange with her daughter, she wrote about a well-connected student, the child of an alumnus or alumna, who had been admitted.

A Harvard lawyer, William F. Lee, later asked McGrath if she understood that she was being accused by Mortara of having a bias against Asian-Americans. She said she did understand.

“Is that true?” Lee asked.

“No,” McGrath responded.

Earlier in the day, Students for Fair Admissions lawyers focused their questioning on a series of charts that were created by Harvard’s Office of Institutional Research in 2013 and shared with admissions officers.

ADVERTISEMENT

The charts were meant to help Harvard officials analyze “tips” applicants could receive for increasing their chances of admission. One tip — a personal rating that admissions officials give each applicant based on interviews, recommendations, and other factors — appears to show that being Asian-American can hurt an applicant’s chances.

The Harvard officials on the stand said the analyses were meant to be exploratory and did not offer a complete picture of what admissions officials actually do. Some of the analyses were incomplete, they said, and oversimplified. They added that the analyses could not be used to draw conclusions about the effects of race on admissions officers’ decisions, and have pointed out that the work also shows that low-income students of all racial and ethnic groups receive a tip in their process.

They have said that they do not generally consider race in the personal rating — though it can sometimes be relevant if an applicant has overcome adversity because of his or her race — but do consider it in the overall rating.

The trial will continue on Monday and is expected to last about three weeks.

Nell Gluckman writes about faculty issues and other topics in higher education. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.

Read other items in Harvard on Trial.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Race
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gluckman_Nell.jpg
About the Author
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Access & Affordability
Congressional Republicans Want to End Grad PLUS Loans. How Might It Affect Your Campus?
Florida Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, Jr. delivers remarks during the State Board of Education meeting at Winter Park High School, Wednesday, March 27, 2024.
Executive Privilege
In Florida, University Presidents’ Pay Goes Up. Is Politics to Blame?

From The Review

Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Rise of a New Ed Tech Buzzword
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
The Review | Opinion
What RFK Jr. Got Right About Academic Publishing
By Robert M. Kaplan

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin