Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Admissions

Harvard’s Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Goes on Trial on Monday. Here’s What to Expect.

By Nell Gluckman October 12, 2018
The latest front in the fight over affirmative action opens in a federal courtroom in Boston and could have lasting implications for colleges nationwide.
The latest front in the fight over affirmative action opens in a federal courtroom in Boston and could have lasting implications for colleges nationwide.Alamy Stock Photo

A highly anticipated trial over the admissions practices of one of the nation’s most influential universities could have lasting implications for colleges across the country.

The trial, to hear a lawsuit challenging Harvard University’s race-conscious admissions policy, is set to begin on Monday in Boston. The case, brought by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions Inc., which is led by the conservative activist Edward J. Blum, claims the university discriminates against Asian-American applicants by limiting the number of those students it admits.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The latest front in the fight over affirmative action opens in a federal courtroom in Boston and could have lasting implications for colleges nationwide.
The latest front in the fight over affirmative action opens in a federal courtroom in Boston and could have lasting implications for colleges nationwide.Alamy Stock Photo

A highly anticipated trial over the admissions practices of one of the nation’s most influential universities could have lasting implications for colleges across the country.

The trial, to hear a lawsuit challenging Harvard University’s race-conscious admissions policy, is set to begin on Monday in Boston. The case, brought by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions Inc., which is led by the conservative activist Edward J. Blum, claims the university discriminates against Asian-American applicants by limiting the number of those students it admits.

The case challenges a common practice among selective institutions that is meant to ensure that they admit diverse groups of students, and it is unusual because it invokes the rights of Asian-American applicants instead of white ones. It is also the first case since the Trump administration took office to challenge affirmative action, a practice that the Obama administration defended. Legal analysts say the issue is likely to make its way back to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The U.S. Justice Department, under Attorney General Jeff Sessions (shown with President Trump, left), said in a leaked memo that it was seeking lawyers to conduct “investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.”
Race-Conscious Admissions Returns to the Spotlight
Barely a year after the U.S. Supreme Court appeared to issue its final word on this form of affirmative action, the issue is back, following a Justice Department memo that seemed to promise Trump-administration investigations of colleges. Here’s all of The Chronicle’s coverage.
  • Harvard Doesn’t Discriminate Against Asian American Applicants, U.S. Appeals Court Rules
  • 3 Takeaways From the Appeal of the Harvard Admissions Lawsuit
  • A Judge Advised Harvard to Give Its Admissions Officers Training to Stop Bias. Will That Help?

Blum’s group says Harvard penalizes Asian-American applicants by systematically scoring them lower on metrics used to judge personality. The group says the university should not be allowed to consider race when making decisions about who is admitted as an undergraduate student.

Harvard has said that the race of applicants is just one factor among many that it considers in evaluating candidates. Admitting a diverse class, the university says, benefits all students in that class, a goal that is central to its educational mission and that has been upheld by the Supreme Court.

The case is expected to lay bare details of Harvard’s secretive admissions process as the university’s lawyers seek to prove that it does not use racial quotas or attempt to “balance” its class by race and ethnicity — both illegal practices. Since the lawsuit was filed, in 2014, the private university has fought to keep its admissions practices out of the public eye.

But those attempts have not entirely succeeded. Already, details about how the university selects students have appeared in court filings. For example, admissions officials keep a close eye on a “dean’s interest list” that includes the children of donors who are applying. There’s also a “Z-list” that Students for Fair Admissions claims includes well-connected applicants who “cannot gain admission through the ordinary course” and are instead admitted after deferring admission for a year.

Court filings also show that Harvard uses a numerical system to rate candidates. Each is graded on his or her academic potential, extracurricular work, athletic abilities, and character, and is given an overall score. Admissions officials then discuss the students in committees and subcommittees, and admit about 2,000 of the 40,000 applicants. This year the university’s acceptance rate was 4.7 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

The current freshman class is 22.9 percent Asian-American, according to statistics released by the university. In 2016, the most-recent year for which federal data are available, 17 percent of Harvard’s student body was Asian-American, which placed it in the middle among its Ivy League peers. African-American students make up 15.2 percent of the current freshman class, and Hispanic or Latino students 12.3 percent.

Asian-American Enrollment in the Ivy League

The proportion of Asian-American undergraduate students at Harvard University, which is being sued over its admissions practices, is similar to those at other Ivy League institutions, according to federal data.

Institution % of Asian-American undergraduates
Princeton U. 21%
Cornell U. 19%
U. of Pennsylvania 19%
Yale U. 18%
Columbia U. 17%
Harvard U. 17%
Brown U. 15%
Dartmouth College 15%
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, College Navigator, Fall 2017

Beyond Harvard

The case against Harvard is just the latest front in a broader fight over affirmative action in college admissions spearheaded by one man: Edward Blum. He was also behind the lawsuit that claimed the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy discriminated against white applicants. The Supreme Court sided with Texas in 2016, upholding its use of affirmative action. But that didn’t stop Blum’s group, which has also accused the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill of racial discrimination against applicants.

Now it has an important ally: the Trump administration’s Department of Justice. In August the department filed a statement of interest in the Harvard case, siding with Students for Fair Admissions. Harvard’s treatment of Asian-American applicants “may be infected with racial bias,” the filing said. It urged the university to consider race-neutral alternatives to its existing process. The department also recently opened an investigation into whether Yale University discriminates against applicants based on their race.

Harvard has said that it has considered race-neutral alternatives, but that they do not allow the university to achieve the level of diversity it wants. In a brief filed in support of Harvard, 16 universities — including Case Western Reserve, Johns Hopkins, Princeton, and Yale — wrote that they must be allowed to consider race when trying to build diverse classes of students.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Diversity encourages students to question their own assumptions, to test received truths, and to appreciate the complexity of the modern world,” they wrote. “It is artificial to consider an applicant’s experiences and perspectives while turning a blind eye to race.”

A coalition of Harvard student organizations, including the Harvard-Radcliffe Asian-American Association and societies representing other racial and ethnic groups, also filed a brief in support of the university. The groups condemned “the attempt to manufacture conflict between racial and ethnic groups in order to revive an unrelenting agenda to dismantle efforts to create a racially diverse and inclusive student body.”

Who Will Testify?

The trial will take place in Federal District Court in Boston and is expected to last two to three weeks. It is not a jury trial, but will be decided by Judge Allison D. Burroughs, who was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2014. She won’t issue a decision immediately after both sides finish presenting their cases, as a jury would, but possibly weeks or months later.

Some of Harvard’s top officials are expected to testify, including Catherine G. (Drew) Faust, the former president; William R. Fitzsimmons, dean of admissions; and Rakesh Khurana, dean of Harvard College, the university’s undergraduate division. Ruth J. Simmons, president of Prairie View A&M University, is also on the witness list. As president of Brown University in the 2000s, Simmons was the first black leader of an Ivy League institution.

ADVERTISEMENT

Neither Harvard nor Students for Fair Admissions plans to call any students as witnesses. But a group of Harvard students and alumni asked the judge if they could testify about their experiences as racial and ethnic minorities at the institution. Earlier this month the judge said they could. They say their perspectives do not perfectly align with the interests of either side, but they believe the university must be allowed to consider race when evaluating applicants.

Whatever the outcome, the case is likely to be appealed. There’s plenty of speculation that it will end up before the Supreme Court, just like the case against Texas. But this one is different, not only because of the unusual alliance between conservative activists and some sectors of the Asian-American population. Since the confirmation this month of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court will almost certainly be more conservative than it was the last time it heard a challenge to affirmative action.

Nell Gluckman writes about faculty issues and other topics in higher education. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the October 26, 2018, issue.
Read other items in Harvard on Trial.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Race
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gluckman_Nell.jpg
About the Author
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Will Students Testify in the Case Against Harvard’s Race-Conscious Admissions Procedures?
Justice Dept. Slams Harvard Admissions in Affirmative-Action Filing
In Court Battle Over Harvard Admissions, Plaintiffs Allege University Ignored ‘Negative Effects’ on Asian-Americans

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin