Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Diversion

Hey, Look Over Here!

Facing right-wing trolls, colleges use distraction to keep students from feeding them

By Steve Kolowich November 15, 2017
The soul singer V. Bozeman was among the performers at Texas A&M’s “Aggies United” rally, an alternative to the white nationalist Richard Spencer’s campus appearance the same night. At least one student wasn’t buying it: “I feel like the Aggies United event and all the performers are just an attempt to distract from what’s going on,” Raygan Batiste said.
The soul singer V. Bozeman was among the performers at Texas A&M’s “Aggies United” rally, an alternative to the white nationalist Richard Spencer’s campus appearance the same night. At least one student wasn’t buying it: “I feel like the Aggies United event and all the performers are just an attempt to distract from what’s going on,” Raygan Batiste said.Gabriel Chmielewski, Texas A&M U.

Richard Spencer was coming, and Texas A&M University couldn’t stop him. The First Amendment was on the white nationalist’s side. So the university needed to figure out how to make him feel unwelcome without locking the door.

Since Mr. Spencer thrives on attention, university officials decided to try to cut off his air supply. They scheduled an “Aggies United” rally to coincide with his talk. They invited actors, musicians, dancers, student leaders and athletes, the president, the chancellor, a Holocaust survivor. There were lofty proclamations about the power of love over hate.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The soul singer V. Bozeman was among the performers at Texas A&M’s “Aggies United” rally, an alternative to the white nationalist Richard Spencer’s campus appearance the same night. At least one student wasn’t buying it: “I feel like the Aggies United event and all the performers are just an attempt to distract from what’s going on,” Raygan Batiste said.
The soul singer V. Bozeman was among the performers at Texas A&M’s “Aggies United” rally, an alternative to the white nationalist Richard Spencer’s campus appearance the same night. At least one student wasn’t buying it: “I feel like the Aggies United event and all the performers are just an attempt to distract from what’s going on,” Raygan Batiste said.Gabriel Chmielewski, Texas A&M U.

Richard Spencer was coming, and Texas A&M University couldn’t stop him. The First Amendment was on the white nationalist’s side. So the university needed to figure out how to make him feel unwelcome without locking the door.

Since Mr. Spencer thrives on attention, university officials decided to try to cut off his air supply. They scheduled an “Aggies United” rally to coincide with his talk. They invited actors, musicians, dancers, student leaders and athletes, the president, the chancellor, a Holocaust survivor. There were lofty proclamations about the power of love over hate.

Mr. Spencer later derided the rally as “world’s largest safe space,” but Raygan Batiste, one of several black students who chose to go to Mr. Spencer’s event instead, may have been closer to the mark when she said Texas A&M was trying to create a diversion.

“I feel like the Aggies United event and all the performers are just an attempt to distract from what’s going on,” she told The Chronicle.

It has been the year of the free-speech arsonist. Right-wing heels like Mr. Spencer and Milo Yiannopoulos have used campuses to stage a kind of performance art: They rhetorically take a match to the values higher education has promoted for years. Then they dare somebody to try to stop them. Often it works: Sometimes people light actual fires. Sometimes they wear balaclavas and throw rocks. One time, somebody got shot.

Colleges have been left with the unhappy task of accommodating these speakers while also distancing themselves and trying to avoid the calamity of a violent counterprotest. A popular approach has been to hold an alternative event that officials and students can feel good about — a place for students to go instead of standing in a crowd and yelling at neo-Nazis or hiding out in their dorm rooms. Something positive and newsworthy — with celebrities, if possible.

Drawing eyes away from shock-and-awe political figures is difficult for the simple reason that something exotic and frightful is more interesting than something familiar and expected. The prospect of a neo-Nazi invasion of an otherwise peaceful campus is captivating and urgent. A talk about the importance of tolerance and respect? Quite possibly a yawn, even for those who agree.

“That’s like mom and dad telling the kids, ‘Don’t go to the prom, we’re going to have soda and snacks in the rec room,’” says Gene Grabowski, a partner at the crisis-management firm Kglobal.

Michael Young, president of Texas A&M U., addresses the crowd at an event intended to focus attention away from a campus speech by the white nationalist Richard Spencer on the same night. How well do such distractions work?
Michael Young, president of Texas A&M U., addresses the crowd at an event intended to focus attention away from a campus speech by the white nationalist Richard Spencer on the same night. How well do such distractions work?Gabriel Chmielewski, Texas A&M U.

In the run-up to the infamous Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, the University of Virginia planned a daylong symposium to promote a more positive, thoughtful view of how race can and should be discussed. The program included lectures on free speech, inequity, enfranchisement, race and education, and conservative politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

UVa officials considered several ways of describing the event, none of which were particularly direct about the racist menace that had necessitated it: “Unity Dialogues,” “community conversations,” then, finally, “a reflective conversation.” Organizers were eager to crow about the event, but there was considerable trepidation internally about how widely to discuss it, email records show. In August, when a Chronicle reporter asked to interview an associate provost who had helped put together the symposium, the university’s central communications office instructed him not to do it. (The associate provost seemed surprised, writing to a colleague: "!!!!”)

In any case, the Unite the Right rally ended up overshadowing everything else. Violence at the rally, including a white supremacist’s deadly car attack on counterprotesters, prompted the governor to declare a state of emergency. The university postponed the symposium.

Teresa A. Sullivan, the UVa president, had suggested that students avoid the racist demonstration. Other college presidents have given similar advice. Last winter, when Republican students at the University of Washington invited Mr. Yiannopoulos to speak on campus, Ana Mari Cauce, the president, admonished would-be protesters to stay away.

“I believe that letting him speak without interruption or audience beyond like-minded people,” she wrote in a public message before the event, “would deny him the thing he seems to want most: attention.”

I believe that letting him speak without interruption or audience beyond like-minded people would deny him the thing he seems to want most: attention.

Don’t go for the bait. That might be fine advice for the white people whom Mr. Spencer and Mr. Yiannopoulos see as potential recruits, but some people at UVa questioned whether inviting students to retreat to campus redoubts for lectures and a “diversity potluck” meal was the best move. For some students — particularly students of color — the neo-Nazis who marched across the campus on the eve of the rally represented more than a nuisance. They were an existential threat.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Not confronting them,” Laura E. Goldblatt, a postdoctoral fellow in the English department, told The Chronicle in August, “is only an option for people already protected by institutional structures.”

Not everybody who stands against white nationalism wants to literally go toe-to-toe with white nationalists. When Mr. Spencer spoke last month at the University of Florida, some students of color were nervous even about leaving the safety of their dorm rooms, says Bijal Desai, a third-year student who is president of the Volunteers for International Student Affairs.

Mr. Desai was part of a group that put together a “virtual assembly” — a series of videos about race relations that Florida students could watch while Mr. Spencer was giving his talk elsewhere on campus. The idea was to give students of color a venue to be heard at the same time as Mr. Spencer without having to put themselves in harm’s way.

In order to “entice viewers,” says Mr. Desai, the university reached out to Tim Tebow in the hope of getting him to record a video for the assembly; the former Gators quarterback reportedly declined. The videos didn’t mention Mr. Spencer, according to Mr. Desai. “It was really focused on really big material like love and hate,” he says.

ADVERTISEMENT

Are these alternative events working? It depends on how you measure success. Mr. Desai, an economics major who described himself as a “numbers guy,” says that the assembly got good ratings, Mr. Tebow or no. About 1,000 people logged in to the online event while Mr. Spencer was giving his talk to a much smaller crowd on campus.

“That’s what success looks like to me,” Mr. Desai says.

For Amy B. Smith, Texas A&M’s chief marketing and communications officer, the results were mixed. She disagrees with the idea that the university merely was trying to divert people from Mr. Spencer’s talk. The Aggies United rally was, by her account, a moving event in its own right, with stirring performances and a crowd of around 5,000 people — not bad for a chilly night in December. It yielded good video, which the university edited into a two-and-a-half-minute montage with themes of togetherness and tolerance. It also yielded good photos, which Texas A&M made available to media outlets.

To her dismay, however, the news outlets seemed more interested in photos of Mr. Spencer. He was still the main event.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We were severely disappointed in your story coverage of the Richard Spencer uninvited visit and your coverage in a one-on-one interview with full page photo of him,” Ms. Smith later wrote to a Chronicle reporter, “as opposed to covering the Aggies United event and best-class example of how universities can deal with this — which garnered #1 most inspirational moment by Anti-Defamation League.”

Inspirational or not, Ms. Smith says the big-ticket event was not a sustainable solution to the problem of unwanted speakers on campus. Because tickets were free, Aggies United cost Texas A&M about $250,000.

The communications chief says she believes things have gotten more dangerous in the year since Mr. Spencer’s first visit. She’s not sure the university would want to hold another big alternative event these days. Counterprogramming might attract counterprotesters of its own.

“I worry,” says Ms. Smith, “about creating another physical venue for confrontation.”

Steve Kolowich writes about writes about ordinary people in extraordinary times, and extraordinary people in ordinary times. Follow him on Twitter @stevekolowich, or write to him at steve.kolowich@chronicle.com.

Download
  • Dealing With Controversial Speakers on Campus
A version of this article appeared in the December 1, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Steve Kolowich
Steve Kolowich was a senior reporter for The Chronicle of Higher Education. He wrote about extraordinary people in ordinary times, and ordinary people in extraordinary times.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Dealing With Controversial Speakers on Campus
Fear and Loathing in the Campaign’s Wake
A White Supremacist Incites a Crowd at Texas A&M

More News

Photo-based illustration of a mirror on a green, patterned wallpaper wall reflecting Campanile in Berkeley, California.
A Look in the Mirror
At UC Berkeley, the Faculty Asks Itself, Do Our Critics Have a Point?
illustration of an arrow in a bullseye, surrounded by college buildings
Accreditation
A Major College Accreditor Pauses Its DEI Requirements Amid Pressure From Trump
Photo-based illustration of the Rotunda at the University of Virginia obscured by red and white horizontal stripes
'Demanding Obedience'
How Alums Put DEI at UVa in the Justice Dept.’s Crosshairs
Colin Holbrook
Q&A
‘I Didn’t Want to Make a Scene’: A Professor Recounts the Conversation That Got Him Ejected From Commencement

From The Review

American artist Andy Warhol, posing in front of The Last Supper, a personal interpretation the American artist gave of Leonardo da Vinci's Il Cenacolo, realized 1986, belonging to a series dedicated to Leonardo's masterpiece set up in palazzo delle Stelline; the work holds the spirit of Warhol's artistic Weltanschauung, demystifying the artwork in order to deprive it of its uniqueness and no repeatibility. Milan (Italy), 1987.
The Review | Essay
Were the 1980s a Golden Age of Religious Art?
By Phil Christman
Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin