Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Government

Higher Ed Hates the GOP Tax Proposals. Here Are 3 Reasons Why.

By Adam Harris November 30, 2017

Higher-education leaders have been clear on their near-unanimous opposition to Republican proposals to overhaul the tax code. But, with a finish line on a final law taking shape, they may soon have to adapt to a new reality.

A week before Thanksgiving, the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the tax legislation, largely along party lines, and in doing so, raised the hackles of institutions, students, and their advocates. Several college leaders have made known their dissatisfaction with the legislation.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Higher-education leaders have been clear on their near-unanimous opposition to Republican proposals to overhaul the tax code. But, with a finish line on a final law taking shape, they may soon have to adapt to a new reality.

A week before Thanksgiving, the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the tax legislation, largely along party lines, and in doing so, raised the hackles of institutions, students, and their advocates. Several college leaders have made known their dissatisfaction with the legislation.

Among the House bill’s most devastating provisions, they said, were a tax on tuition waivers provided to employees of colleges (including graduate students), the elimination of several student and family tax benefits, a reduction in the number of people who can itemize their charitable deductions, and a 1.4-percent tax on investment earnings by endowments at some private colleges.

The U.S. Senate’s version of the bill was similar, with a few significant tweaks. Noticeably absent were the tax on tuition waivers for graduate students, and the elimination of tax breaks for students. The bill did, however, introduce a tax on royalties generated from the licensing of a college’s logo as unrelated business income. That proposal appears unlikely to make it into the final bill, if passed by the Senate.

The Senate is expected to hold a final vote on the bill on Friday. A report released Thursday afternoon by the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the bill would add $1 trillion to the deficit.

“We are watching the process unfold, and monitoring amendments to the Senate bill to make sure nothing sneaks in,” said Steven M. Bloom, director of governmental relations at the American Council on Education.

Here’s where things stand on three areas that higher-ed leaders have cited as causes for concern:

Graduate-Student Tuition-Waiver Tax

The most talked-about proposal in the House’s version of the legislation was a tax on tuition waivers for campus employees, including graduate students. The waivers help graduate-student workers who would otherwise be unable to afford tuition. Many students rallied against the provision.

“Increasing the tax burden on students and universities will make quality higher education less accessible and limit groundbreaking research conducted in the United States,” said Samuel L. Stanley, president of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, in a written statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even though the measure didn’t make it into the Senate’s version, it could still be added during reconciliation of the two measures. (Both the House and the Senate have to agree on a single piece of legislation before it can go to the president’s desk to be signed.)

Charitable Giving

A number of measures in the House’s tax plan were said to have potentially negative effects on charitable giving. The bill calls for doubling the standard deduction for taxpayers — as the Senate’s version would — and reducing the number of people who can itemize their charitable contributions. The House bill would cut that figure from roughly 30 percent of filers to 5 percent.

“Donations to universities are highly reliant on individuals who benefit from tax deductions,” wrote F. King Alexander, president of Louisiana State University. “And the proposed tax reform will remove the deductibility on many donations, potentially eliminating an important incentive to give.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“If passed without important modifications, our public universities will be faced with even bigger challenges at a time of increasing state-funding instability,” he added.

(In the final hours of Senate negotiations, some lawmakers floated measures that would alleviate the burden on organizations that rely on donations.)

Endowments

The proposed 1.4-percent tax on investment earnings by endowments at private colleges that enroll at least 500 students and have assets of $250,000 per full-time student drew early ire. Both House and Senate bills include the measure, and there is no indication that it is going away.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Chronicle analysis found that the tax would affect fewer than 65 institions.

But Margaret Spellings, president of the University of North Carolina system and an education secretary under President George W. Bush, argued that the legislation “would siphon millions in donated funds away from crucial priorities and would set a dangerous precedent of taxing nonprofit institutions — a practice that is likely to only escalate in scope and scale as lawmakers seek offsets for other cuts in the future.”

Adam Harris is a breaking-news reporter. Follow him on Twitter @AdamHSays or email him at adam.harris@chronicle.com.

Read other items in What Colleges Need to Know About the Tax Overhaul Poised to Become Law.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Adam Harris - Profile Pic
About the Author
Adam Harris
Adam Harris, a staff writer at The Atlantic, was previously a reporter at The Chronicle of Higher Education and covered federal education policy and historically Black colleges and universities. He also worked at ProPublica.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Tax Reform That Students, Colleges, and Our Country Can’t Afford
If Republicans Get Their Way, These Colleges Would See Their Endowments Taxed
Graduate Students Mobilize ‘to Stop Something That Can Ruin Us’
Senate Bill Would Impose Endowment Tax but Keep Tuition Waivers Tax-Free

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin