Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Review

Higher Education Has Lost Control of Its Own Narrative

By Daniel Seymour November 6, 2016
Higher Education Has Lost Control  of Its Own Narrative 1
Errata Carmona for The Chronicle

The race for the presidency of the United States has highlighted for Americans — and the world — sharply contrasting visions of our nation. Democrats offered an optimistic vision based on the common good and a shared purpose, with slogans like “Stronger together” and “Love trumps hate.” Republicans focused on a different vision. With slogans like “Make America safe again” they chose to dwell on the threats associated with crime, terrorism, and economic uncertainty.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The race for the presidency of the United States has highlighted for Americans — and the world — sharply contrasting visions of our nation. Democrats offered an optimistic vision based on the common good and a shared purpose, with slogans like “Stronger together” and “Love trumps hate.” Republicans focused on a different vision. With slogans like “Make America safe again” they chose to dwell on the threats associated with crime, terrorism, and economic uncertainty.

In many companies, a great deal of attention is paid to vision. For example, the question “What do we want to create?” generates specific actions in industry: board discussions, retreats, product-line changes, website redesigns, new-employee training, and messaging in social media. Nike, Zappos, and Patagonia, among other companies, are thought to excel at articulating a compelling, shared vision. Nonprofit organizations, too, engage in the “vision thing.” Oxfam, Habitat for Humanity, and the Smithsonian, for example, have developed clear and inspiring expressions of their desired outcomes.

In contrast, a recent examination I conducted of 140 colleges and universities suggests that institutions of higher education appear to be much less sanguine about articulating their ambitions.

An initial finding of the study is a lack of appreciation for what a compelling, shared vision can do for a college. It should create structural tension between an actual state (where we are) and a desired state (where we want to be). That tension should lead to strategic actions to resolve the discrepancy. This means vision statements need to be stated in forward-leaning language — “will be,” “aspires to become.” Yet many of the vision statements in the study’s sample use the language of today — “is” or “will continue to be” — to describe tomorrow. It is as though many colleges feel that they have already arrived at their destinations and see no real need to challenge themselves or the status quo.

A second finding involves the practical use of vision statements. They aren’t supposed to be decorative or mere afterthoughts. They function to support decision-making, the allocation of scarce resources, and the emotional spark to drive positive change. They should be the basis for the development and execution of an institution’s strategic plan — “How do we get there?” But too often, strategic plans are found in separate parts of a website, with no mention of an aspirational vision; this reflects an unfortunate disconnect between articulating a future and linking it to a series of concrete steps to get there.

Next, many vision statements also lack distinctiveness. A vision that isn’t distinctive is a vision that isn’t compelling. Much of the language being used by colleges and universities involves words such as “excellence,” “quality,” and “pre-eminent.” Such words are then seemingly cobbled together to develop vision statements. Indeed, the analysis shows that many institutions fail the “Wite-Out Test” — institutional vision statements within Carnegie categories are placed side by side, Wite-Out is applied to the names of the colleges, and they immediately become indistinguishable from one another.

A summary finding is that even if colleges and universities have a vision, most apparently don’t feel the need to communicate their aspirations. While regional accrediting associations require the existence of a mission (“Why do we exist?”), fewer than six in 10 of the institutions in the study had visions that could be located on their websites. When visions were located, they were usually found under a tab that said “About the College” or a similar catch-all category, alongside campus maps, parking, and an events calendar.

Rarely, if ever, are any references made to the future of the institution — what it actually hopes to achieve — on or even near its home page.

Why is this important? Why should a lack of an aspirational vision matter to institutions of higher education? Because we have the responsibility to ourselves and our stakeholders to describe and articulate our own future. A compelling, shared vision enables us to develop coherence around our decision-making, energizes people to take the journey, and convinces others that we are clear and confident about what tomorrow will bring.

Anything less is an abdication of responsibility.

We have simply invested too little time and effort asking and answering the primary visioning question: “What do we want to create?” We either don’t think that articulating a compelling, shared vision is necessary, or we can’t gain consensus on what the future should look like, or we are just too busy with our day-to-day work to reflect on such a challenging question. When we do, there doesn’t seem to be much effort devoted to applying criteria to what makes a catalyzing vision or describing a future that is something truly special.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, the language appears to be reviewed only once every six to 10 years by an internal team, then buried in the pages of a catalog. There is little alignment and energy around specific strategies and the allocation of scarce resources to achieve a collective ambition. Under such circumstances, what was good enough yesterday can easily become good enough for today and even for tomorrow. Inertia and the grip of the status quo dominate.

Unfortunately, the inability or unwillingness to describe a different future is now being interpreted by others as intransigence, arrogance, or aloofness.

That result has helped to usher in an era of accountability in which the locus of control has shifted. Everyone — state agencies, boards, magazines, television pundits — has an opinion about what we should be doing, how we should assess ourselves, and increasingly, in the public sector, states have created budgets with strings attached. The conversation has shifted from the positive societal attributes of higher education to a list of grievances against its institutions.

The mantra of “accountability” has helped fuel a hypercritical environment in which the difference between what we perceive we do and how others perceive us has grown from a small breach to a yawning chasm.

ADVERTISEMENT

Demonstrating responsibility — which begins by articulating a positive future — is about owning change, being self-regarding, and then seeking to thrive. Being held accountable for a future that someone else is specifying is about being changed, becoming a victim, and then merely surviving.

One choice is a commitment to embrace and shape a different tomorrow; the other is complying with someone else’s expectations for you. One is being proactive by describing a desired state and then designing systems and processes to get there; the other is reacting to circumstances by finding and fixing problems.

We in higher education have lost control of the narrative.

It would appear that political parties, companies, and many other types of organizations have determined that a clear vision for the future is crucial to their success. So, should “visioning” also be important to higher education? The answer should be a resounding “yes.” These results suggest that if we can’t describe our future, others will be happy to do it for us — and to hold us accountable for achieving it, too.

Daniel Seymour teaches at California State University-Channel Islands and is the author of Future College Fieldbook: Mission, Vision, and Values in Higher Education (Olive Press, 2016).

A version of this article appeared in the November 11, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Greetings From Wisconsin, Where Higher Ed Is a Love-Hate Affair
A Small College Sells Marketing to Its Cautious Faculty
Brands of Nonsense
The Upside of Selling Your Soul

More News

Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.
lab-costs-promo.jpg
Research Expenses
What Does It Cost to Run a Lab?
Research illustration Microscope
Dreams Deferred
How Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Are Derailing Young Scholars’ Careers

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin