Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Electoral Research

How a College Degree ‘Supercharges’ a Divide Among White Voters

By Steven Johnson November 5, 2018
voters1105
Frederic J. Brown, AFP, Getty Images

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, pundits and academics marveled at how the college degree had become a key political dividing line: Would Donald J. Trump become the first Republican presidential nominee in 60 years to lose among white college graduates? It appears that he did — and the division has only widened heading into the midterm elections, according to a recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, which found an unprecedented divergence between white women with college degrees and white men without degrees.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

voters1105
Frederic J. Brown, AFP, Getty Images

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, pundits and academics marveled at how the college degree had become a key political dividing line: Would Donald J. Trump become the first Republican presidential nominee in 60 years to lose among white college graduates? It appears that he did — and the division has only widened heading into the midterm elections, according to a recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, which found an unprecedented divergence between white women with college degrees and white men without degrees.

A college degree has “supercharged” the split among white voters, the Journal found. (Meanwhile, nonwhite voters of differing educational levels actually grew more closely aligned in their political views.) College-educated white voters prefer a Democratic Congress by a whopping 34-percentage-point margin compared with white voters without degrees.

The gap is even starker when split by gender. White college-educated women favor Democratic control of Congress by a net 33 points, while less-educated men favor Republican control by 42 points — the widest such chasm since the poll first measured it, in 1994.

What is it about a college degree — especially when filtered by race and gender — that so starkly correlates with political beliefs?

Deciphering any political “gap” by education, race, or gender is tricky enough. Layering them on top of one another makes the job even harder. But scholars have chipped away at factors behind those political fault lines in recent years.

In the social sciences, a college degree is more than just a piece of paper, said Tatishe M. Nteta, an associate professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. It’s an indicator of a set of networks and worldviews provided by the campus and classroom experience.

“People who have a college degree tend to be friends with, tend to work with, tend to live in neighborhoods with individuals who also have college degrees,” Nteta said. College students meet peers from all sorts of racial and ethnic backgrounds, he said, and often learn about the histories of sexism and racism in their general-education classes.

In a recent paper, Nteta and his colleagues studied voter samples from the 2016 election to analyze what had driven the so-called education gap among white voters. In the four preceding presidential elections, the gap hovered at five to seven percentage points.

But “the 2016 campaign witnessed a dramatic polarization in the vote choices of whites based on education,” the scholars wrote, such that white voters with degrees split from those without degrees by 18 points, the largest such gap since 1964. (Back then, the party alignments were reversed.)

ADVERTISEMENT

A common narrative attributed that divergence to economic dissatisfaction in the white working class. But the Massachusetts team found that sexism and “racism denial” — a stand-in measure for racist beliefs — were far stronger in explaining why those without college degrees favored Trump.

‘Racism Denial’

One reason for the widening gap could lie in how a college degree mediates one’s beliefs about gender and race. “Those who have a college degree are less likely to express negative views of racial outgroups relative to those who do not,” Nteta said. The 2016 campaign, marked as it was “by exceptionally explicit rhetoric on race and gender,” as the paper noted, could have brought those differences to the fore.

A college degree can signal a person’s access to information and critical-reasoning skills as well as her social class, said Susan J. Carroll, a professor of political science and women’s and gender studies at Rutgers University at New Brunswick and a senior scholar at the Center for American Women and Politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

For instance, a college graduate may be less susceptible to claims that immigrants are “taking our jobs,” as Trump has asserted, not only because she has learned to think critically, but also because she is less likely to end up in a precarious economic circumstance than those without a degree.

Behind the recent split by gender and education is a long history of gender differences in political alignment, Carroll said. Since the election of President Ronald Reagan, in 1980, when men drifted toward the Republicans, women have favored Democratic candidates more often than men have.

There’s “no single straightforward explanation” for that, Carroll said, but she agreed that the hypercharged narratives of the 2016 election — including the possibility of electing the first female president — helped further splinter voter groups by education and gender.

Trump won white voters without college degrees by a net 50 points among men and 23 points among women, according to a recent analysis by the Pew Research Center. Those groups now favor Republican candidates for the House by 39 and 12 points, respectively, according to a Washington Post/ABC News poll.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scholars are still debating the causes and effects of the Trump era’s political shifts. The clearest data points so far will become apparent this week, but that doesn’t portend clear answers. And exit polls, imperfect as they are, may reveal still less.

“I’m just looking forward to seeing where we’re at as a country on Wednesday,” Nteta said. Admittedly, his interest as a social scientist “usually means that the country might not be doing that well.” But “the vote in 2018,” he said, “is symbolic of who we are and who we’re going to be.”

Follow Steven Johnson on Twitter at @stetyjohn, or email him at steve.johnson@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Steven Johnson
Steven Johnson is an Indiana-born journalist who’s reported stories about business, culture, and education for The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Washington Post, and The Atlantic.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

On Election Day, Here’s What Higher Ed Should Watch For
Here’s How Colleges Can Get More Involved in Elections — and Not Just in the Midterms
The Oddest Ballot Measure on Higher Ed? Look to Florida

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin