Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Commentary

How Colleges Lost Billions to Hedge Funds in 2016

By Charlie Eaton February 20, 2017

A peculiar thing happened in 2016. While the Dow Jones industrial average grew by almost 5 percent, college endowments saw nearly a negative 2 percent rate of return. The worst endowment performance took place at the nation’s wealthiest private institutions. Harvard’s endowment alone shrank by $2 billion, a 5-percent decline. Out of the 40 biggest endowments, 35 declined in value.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

A peculiar thing happened in 2016. While the Dow Jones industrial average grew by almost 5 percent, college endowments saw nearly a negative 2 percent rate of return. The worst endowment performance took place at the nation’s wealthiest private institutions. Harvard’s endowment alone shrank by $2 billion, a 5-percent decline. Out of the 40 biggest endowments, 35 declined in value.

What’s going on here?

A key factor is poor performance by the hedge-fund gurus that institutions have increasingly paid to manage their investment portfolios. Colleges have reason to be angry because hedge funds charge high fees even when they lose money. Colleges and universities spent an estimated $2.5 billion on fees for hedge funds in 2015 alone. They paid an estimated 60 cents to hedge funds for every dollar in investment returns between 2009 and 2015, according to a report by the Strong Economy for All Coalition. These fees helped each of the top five U.S. hedge-fund managers earn more than $1 billion in 2015 despite mixed performance.

Unfortunately, the disastrous endowment performance of 2016 disproportionately affects public colleges and less-wealthy private colleges, while leaving the most-elite private institutions with their wealth intact. The wealthiest colleges felt relatively little impact from their losses in 2016 because they have benefited from major endowment growth since 1977.

To understand the current situation, it’s helpful to understand the backstory. Endowment wealth increased sevenfold, from $16 billion in 1977 to $112 billion in 2012, at the eight private research universities that had endowments larger than $1 billion in 1977 (all dollar amounts are in 2012 dollars) — Columbia, Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, and Yale Universities, the Universities of Chicago and Rochester, and MIT. Several colleagues and I document the last 10 years of this growth in detail in a recent article for the journal Socio-Economic Review.

Endowment growth at those eight wealthiest institutions benefited from two major shifts related to the increasing importance of financial markets and financial ideas throughout the economy. First, the colleges substantially ramped up donations to their endowments by adding members to their boards from the growing class of very wealthy Wall Street financiers.

Second, starting in the 1970s, the wealthiest universities shifted from a conservative investment strategy centered around bonds to more aggressive investment in stocks and other equities. In the process, they created what amounted to in-house hedge funds. These funds are staffed by top investment managers who are paid millions of dollars annually. Under their stewardship, the eight colleges went from average annual investment returns of just 5 percent in the 1960s and 1970s to average annual gains of 10 percent from 1980 to 2010.

Without sufficient resources to establish their own in-house hedge funds, the rest of America’s colleges and universities have followed the lead of those elite eight by turning over increasing shares of their endowment portfolios to actual hedge funds. Back in 1981, just 15 percent of colleges with endowments were invested in venture capital funds, the forerunner to today’s hedge funds, according to the Nacubo Endowment Survey. Even by 1987, less than 1 percent of all endowment assets were invested in venture capital funds, with only one college investing more than 12.5 percent of its assets with venture capital. In contrast, by 2015, most colleges and over 20 percent of all college-endowment assets — more than $100 billion — were invested in hedge funds.

But after promising higher returns, hedge funds have performed poorly for higher education and investors more broadly in the last two years. This is evident in the losses across nearly all endowments despite strong stock-market growth. Proponents of hedge funds would argue that this is because high-risk hedge-fund strategies can yield volatile returns but produce higher average growth in the long run. However, critics allege that hedge funds are performing worse now because Obama-era financial regulations are requiring them to play by new rules designed to prevent another financial crisis.

Hedge-fund performance may remain volatile even if President Trump succeeds in rolling back Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and other Obama-era regulations. Dodd-Frank required Securities and Exchange Commission registration of hedge funds and the separation of hedge funds and consumer banking to prevent this volatility from bringing down the broader banking system.

Whatever the reason for poor hedge-fund performance, hedge-fund managers are now failing to deliver. And some colleges are pulling their portfolios out of those funds, following the lead of the massive California Public Employees’ Retiree System.

ADVERTISEMENT

Endowment donations and wealth have meanwhile remained concentrated at the elite eight colleges and a handful of other wealthy institutions. Endowment growth has provided substantial surpluses at these institutions in part because they have mostly held undergraduate enrollments flat for the last 30 years. As a result, the wealthiest eight institutions were able to increase spending on university operations just from their endowments from $9,574 per student in 1977 to over $60,000 per student in recent years. This helps to explain a new finding from the Stanford economist Raj Chetty that 38 top private colleges enroll more students from the top 1 percent of the U.S. income spectrum than from the bottom 60 percent combined.

The appeal of hedge funds is understandable for public institutions and less-selective private colleges. These institutions are thirsty for new revenue sources because they have boosted enrollments in recent decades. At the same time, they have struggled with unstable revenue from state appropriations and student loan-financed tuition.

The investment losses of 2016, however, underscore that endowments and hedge funds are not a scalable or reliable solution to their revenue woes. We need to imagine new models for resourcing higher education in the 21st century.

Charlie Eaton is a postdoctoral scholar in the Graduate School of Education at Stanford University. Follow him on Twitter @eatoncharlie.

Correction: An earlier version of this essay showed the Dow Jones rate of return for the 2016 calendar year instead of the 2016 fiscal year. That number has been corrected.

A version of this article appeared in the March 3, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Charlie Eaton
Charlie Eaton is an associate professor of sociology at the University of California at Merced. He is author of Bankers in the Ivory Tower: The Troubling Rise of Financiers in US Higher Education.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

What a $2-Billion Loss Really Means for Harvard and Its Endowment
Congress Again Scrutinizes Colleges With Big Endowments

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin