Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Review

How George Mason Will Take the Controversy Out of Its Gift Agreements

By Ángel Cabrera May 15, 2018
Protesters at George Mason U.'s newly renamed law school in 2016 objected to what they saw as undue influence on the campus by the conservative donor Charles Koch.
Protesters at George Mason U.'s newly renamed law school in 2016 objected to what they saw as undue influence on the campus by the conservative donor Charles Koch. Julian Berger, GMU Fourth Estate

News reports on a controversy regarding some past gift agreements at George Mason University have focused on three important, interrelated, yet distinct issues: a demand for increased transparency in agreements between the university and its private donors; opposition to accepting gifts from donors of a given political persuasion; and the question of what rights are appropriate for a university to grant donors.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Protesters at George Mason U.'s newly renamed law school in 2016 objected to what they saw as undue influence on the campus by the conservative donor Charles Koch.
Protesters at George Mason U.'s newly renamed law school in 2016 objected to what they saw as undue influence on the campus by the conservative donor Charles Koch. Julian Berger, GMU Fourth Estate

News reports on a controversy regarding some past gift agreements at George Mason University have focused on three important, interrelated, yet distinct issues: a demand for increased transparency in agreements between the university and its private donors; opposition to accepting gifts from donors of a given political persuasion; and the question of what rights are appropriate for a university to grant donors.

We ought to be responsive to the first, stand firm against the second, and bring additional clarity to the third as a means of facilitating the other two.

The controversy was triggered by the recent discovery of donor agreements that were accepted by George Mason between 2003 and 2011 in support of the economics department, and which afforded donors some influence in faculty selection and review. All but one of those agreements had expired by the time they were made public, as the result of a Freedom of Information Act request, and the one that still had some pending payments has since been voided, with the donor agreeing to transfer the balance of the pledged gift for general support of the university.

Except for the oldest one, the agreements stated that “the final say in all faculty appointments lies in specified GMU procedures.” The issue was that the agreements granted donors the right to participate in selection and evaluation committees, a circumstance that falls short of the standard of academic independence we should expect in every gift. Those provisions are no longer used in our gift agreements, yet the fact that some past agreements did include such terms raises the question of whether there may be others with similar provisions. In order to clear those doubts, we are conducting a thorough review of all active gift agreements involving faculty appointments.

The publication of the controversial gift agreements has amplified the voices demanding open access to the agreements between the university and its private donors. Leaving aside legal issues being addressed in court as to whether the university foundation, which is a private institution, should be subject to FOIA (my view is that it should not), I agree that public access to gift agreements would increase accountability and help dispel doubts about the nature of the university’s relationships with donors. That is why we made public a recent $5-million gift from the Charles Koch Foundation as well as the 2016 naming gifts to the Antonin Scalia Law School.

We are committed to making this level of transparency our norm, so long as we do not compromise our donors’ legal rights to privacy. Donors, for example, may wish to remain anonymous, or they may request privacy about how they wish to satisfy their pledge or transfer property to the university foundation. As a general principle, however, I agree wholeheartedly that we shall provide as much information as possible. And the current debate highlights the need to accelerate changes.

Other critics go beyond the demand for transparency and disapprove of the university’s accepting gifts from donors of a specific political ideology. Some, most notably the supporters of the “UnKoch My Campus” movement, are explicit about their goal. These demands are troubling. The idea that we ought to apply an ideological litmus test to determine who may or may not donate to the university would run counter to the tenets of academic freedom. The suggestion that we should keep certain conservative donors away only helps intensify the growing concern that colleges are ideologically one-sided. We must stand firm against internal and external pressures to reject gifts for ideological reasons and be proud of our diversity and inclusion, not only of people, but also of ideas.

Our responsibility must be to ensure that any gift agreement, no matter who the donor is, provides adequate protection against undue influence in academic affairs. Outside of academia, allowing donors to participate in the business of the charity organization they support is a common and effective form of cultivation and stewardship. In contrast, colleges must balance the benefits of good donor stewardship with the need to preserve the academic freedom and decision-making independence of the faculty. As a general principle, a donor may fund a professorship that is restricted to a specific discipline (e.g., experimental economics or Mesoamerican anthropology) but may not determine what professors the college hires or tenures, or what any professor may teach or publish.

In practice, though, policies as to what constitutes excessive donor involvement in academic affairs are vague and vary by institution, thus leaving ample room for judgment and controversy. For instance, the gift agreements we released are controversial in part because they allowed for representatives of the donors to participate in selection committees — yet some colleges explicitly allow for that possibility in their policies, and our own policies are silent on the matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

I am forming a committee to review our existing gift agreements supporting faculty positions. It will also be asked to propose changes to our gift-acceptance policies that will bring more clarity to both donors and fund raisers as to the forms of donor engagement we are comfortable with. We must be mindful that all of our donors, large and small, are crucial in allowing us to deliver on our mission amid declining public funding. Every year we serve more students and are recognized as leaders across a wide variety of disciplines. This would not be possible without private support built upon our public foundation.

Ángel Cabrera is president of George Mason University.

A version of this article appeared in the May 25, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Here’s Why Politically Motivated Philanthropy Is Dangerous
All College Giving Should Be Held to the Same Standard
Why George Mason’s Agreements With the Koch Foundation Raised Red Flags
George Mason’s President Says Some Donor Agreements Fell ‘Short’ of Academic Standards

More News

Illustration showing a letter from the South Carolina Secretary of State over a photo of the Bob Jones University campus.
Missing Files
Apparent Paperwork Error Threatens Bob Jones U.'s Legal Standing in South Carolina
Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH
Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin