Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Students

‘How Much Will I Make After Graduating?’ College Scorecard Offers Only Clues

By Kelly Field September 15, 2015
Washington

When President Obama announced the release of a new federal College Scorecard in his weekly address on Saturday, he said the website would give Americans “access to reliable data on every institution of higher education.”

“You’ll be able to see how much each school’s graduates earn, how much debt they graduate with, and what percentage of a school’s students can pay back their loans,” he said.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

When President Obama announced the release of a new federal College Scorecard in his weekly address on Saturday, he said the website would give Americans “access to reliable data on every institution of higher education.”

“You’ll be able to see how much each school’s graduates earn, how much debt they graduate with, and what percentage of a school’s students can pay back their loans,” he said.

But prospective students who turn to the revamped tool to estimate their future earnings probably won’t get a realistic sense of what they can expect to make after graduating. And if they’re checking out state websites with wage data as well, they’re likely to end up more confused than enlightened.

To understand why, let’s consider a hypothetical student — Jake, a junior in Virginia who is looking at four-year colleges in his state. Jake doesn’t want to take on large amounts of debt, so he’s leaning toward a public college at which he can pay in-state tuition. He has excelled in STEM classes, so he enters “Virginia Polytechnic Institute” in the search field of the government’s College Scorecard. A graphic tells him that his projected annual “salary after attending” is $57,900, well above the national average of $34,343. He also learns that 80 percent of Virginia Tech graduates earn more than someone who has only a high-school degree.

If he dug a little further, hovering on the “information” icon above the graphics, Jake would learn that the earnings figure accounts for recipients of federal student aid only, and reflects the earnings of students 10 years after they first enrolled. The 80-percent figure, he’d discover, is based on the share of former students who earn more than $25,000 (the average annual income of young high-school graduates) six years after enrolling.

Here’s what the website wouldn’t tell him: how students who don’t receive federal aid fare, or how graduates’ earnings compare with those of dropouts. Nor would it show how majoring in English, rather than engineering, might affect his earning potential. That limitation matters. A wealth of research has shown that “what you study is more determinative than where you study it,” said Mark S. Schneider, vice president of the American Institutes for Research.

As Jeff Strohl, director of research at the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, put it, the scorecard “tells you what people make, on average, but nobody is average.”

“The misleading part is the variation,” he said. “If you’re a French-literature major at Harvard, you’d better not look at these data and think you’re going to earn $87,000" five years out.

Where State Sites Fall Short

For program-level information, Jake could turn to his state’s higher-education website, which provides average earnings at 18 months and five years after completion, by degree. There he’d learn that the median annual wage for Virginia Tech graduates who earned four-year bachelor’s degrees in the five years ending in 2006 was $52,090 five years after graduation.

He’d also discover the wide variation in wages among majors. Five years out, the average English major was earning just $41,094, while the average chemical-engineering major was making $73,889. Those nuances aren’t captured on the federal site, which provides only a single number for an entire institution.

But the state site has some significant gaps, too. Chief among them is the fact that the data are limited to graduates employed in Virginia in positions that are covered by the state’s unemployment insurance. Missing from the data are graduates who work in the neighboring District of Columbia or Maryland (or any other state), along with federal workers, members of the military, and the self-employed, among others. A note on the state’s website cautions users to “exercise great care to understand the limitations of the available data and their meaning.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Wage outcomes of graduates do not measure the quality or effectiveness of any institution,” the note warns.

And while the state site would give Jake a good sense of what he might earn if he graduated and remained in the state, it wouldn’t help him understand the fiscal consequences of dropping out. That’s because, unlike the federal site, it includes only graduates. Tod Massa, director of policy research and data warehousing at the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, said the state was exploring ways to draw distinctions between those who earn a degree and those who drop out.

“Clearly, you get a better return if you finish than if you don’t, but we can’t say that right now,” he said. (The feds can’t either, since they combine everyone who started at a college.)

Meanwhile, the U.S. Education Department has begun collecting earnings data by program level, with plans to include it in future versions of the scorecard.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now let’s imagine that Jake’s college counselor urges him to expand his college search to private institutions, noting that many of them offer generous financial-aid packages. If Jake restricted his search to Virginia, he would be able to view the same earnings information that he did for public colleges.

But if he ventured outside his home state, he would be likely to be out of luck. That’s because most states that publish graduates’ earnings do so only for public institutions, not private colleges, according to Mr. Schneider. And none allow consumers to compare similar programs across state lines.

So what is Jake, as a prospective student, to do with the inconsistent and incomplete earnings data available to him? He could choose to ignore it, as some overwhelmed students no doubt will. Or he could draw what conclusions he can, piecing together a rough picture of whether a college is likely to be worth the investment in time and money.

Kelly Field is a senior reporter covering federal higher-education policy. Contact her at kelly.field@chronicle.com. Or follow her on Twitter @kfieldCHE.

A version of this article appeared in the September 25, 2015, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Collage of charts
Data
How Faculty Pay and Tenure Can Change Depending on Academic Discipline
Vector illustration of two researcher's hands putting dollar signs into a beaker leaking green liquid.
'Life Support'
As the Nation’s Research-Funding Model Ruptures, Private Money Becomes a Band-Aid
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the sculpture, The Thinker, interlaced with anotehr image of a robot posed as The Thinker with bits of binary code and red strips weaved in.
The Review | Essay
What I Learned Serving on My University’s AI Committee
By Megan Fritts
Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin