Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
College Costs

How One State Reduced In-State Tuition for Undergrads

By Sarah Brown September 2, 2015

The rarity of a public-college tuition cut became a reality this year in Washington State, where lawmakers approved a reduction for state residents over the next two years. At some institutions, the price tag will fall by one-fifth for in-state undergraduate students.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The rarity of a public-college tuition cut became a reality this year in Washington State, where lawmakers approved a reduction for state residents over the next two years. At some institutions, the price tag will fall by one-fifth for in-state undergraduate students.

Every campus will see a 5 percent cut this year, and for 2016-17, students enrolled at four-year colleges and universities will see tuition fall by an additional 10 or 15 percent. Lawmakers also will tie tuition levels to the state’s median family income starting in 2017 in an effort to keep college costs down in the future. (Some campuses are raising tuition for nonresidents and graduate students, although the increases vary and are generally small.)

The state’s college officials were cautious about a tuition cut for several months; their support was contingent on the state’s backfilling the millions of dollars in lost revenue with additional financing. But once lawmakers fulfilled that promise with $200 million in state funds over the next two years, college leaders backed the final plan, which the Legislature passed in June.

Given the increasing public attention on college affordability and student-loan debt, including in the 2016 presidential race, Washington State’s move has generated buzz among lawmakers and administrators nationwide. Still, several volatile factors had to align at once — including finances and politics — for Washington’s tuition cut to take place.

In some states grappling with budget deficits, such a reduction is probably out of reach for now, and tuition cuts might not be sustainable in Washington State or elsewhere without new taxes or an economic boom. Some observers also assert that extra state funds should be used as financial aid for low-income and middle-class students, not wealthier students who can already afford to pay.

How the Debate Was Framed

From 2008-9 to 2014-15, Washington State posted the nation’s third-biggest increase in public-college tuition in terms of inflation-adjusted dollars, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Over that time frame, Washington’s average rate statewide went up 58.6 percent, or $4,009, when adjusted for inflation, compared with a 29-percent average increase nationwide.

Keeping that trend in mind, lawmakers in both parties agreed at the start of the legislative session that they needed to make a meaningful investment in higher education, said Rep. Ross Hunter, a Democrat and chief budget writer in the state’s House of Representatives. The debate concerned what that investment might look like; the tuition-cut plan was a top priority for Republicans.

In Washington the Legislature has control over tuition levels, and the governing boards of the state’s college and universities don’t play much of a role. That structure could increase the likelihood of a tuition cut, said Thomas L. Harnisch, director of state relations and policy analysis at the American Association of State Colleges and Universities.

A tuition reduction is a more concrete outcome for lawmakers to tout to constituents than, for instance, improved institutional quality, he said.

Republicans introduced a bill in February to cut tuition. When college officials delivered their first legislative testimony, early in the session, they emphasized that such a cut would harm campuses unless the state made up for the lost revenue, said Chris Mulick, director of state relations for Washington State University. Administrators worked with lawmakers on the development of the tuition legislation as well as the budget bill, Mr. Mulick said, conversing regularly throughout the spring.

ADVERTISEMENT

Democrats initially pushed back against an across-the-board cut, instead proposing to freeze tuition and increase the number of state-financed grants for less-wealthy students, Mr. Hunter said.

An early version of the Republicans’ bill would have cut tuition by 25 percent at four-year institutions but kept it flat at community colleges. GOP lawmakers eventually backed down to secure Democrats’ support for a more modest, but still significant, cut on every public campus.

The final plan requires the state to find about $200 million for public colleges, much of it to make up for lost tuition revenue. Republicans agreed to close some corporate-tax loopholes to raise the funds, Mr. Hunter said.

Doubts Remain

Sen. Andy Hill, a Republican and chief budget writer in the Senate, said he hoped higher-education investments would, in the future, become “baked into the budget” in Washington State. He expressed confidence that tying tuition to the median family income would not only control college costs but make them more predictable.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Mulick wasn’t so sure about long-term funding. He added that lawmakers have enacted higher-education policies in the past, such as a measure granting tuition-setting authority to the colleges’ governing boards, that did not persist for long.

It is difficult to predict the long-term stability of state spending on higher education given economic ups and downs, Mr. Hunter said. Also, the tuition cut was financed in large part by a one-time move to close tax loopholes, he said.

And while tying tuition to income makes sense in many ways, said Dustin Weeden, a policy specialist at the National Conference of State Legislatures, it means that “wild fluctuations” in state funding could be devastating for colleges and universities.

Another lingering question for Washington, and potentially other states, concerns which students should benefit from college-affordability investments. Mr. Hunter said the funds that offset the tuition cut could have been used more effectively, to increase the number of grants given to middle-class and low-income students. A tuition freeze would have provided enough relief to students who could already afford to pay for college, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The tuition cut came with a corresponding reduction in the state’s college-grant program. It made sense from a budgetary standpoint: A decline in tuition meant less money was needed to keep financial aid at the same support levels.

But similar debates about who should benefit from such measures — all students, or primarily less-affluent students — could get heated in other states, Mr. Mulick said. “We had never viewed that as an either-or type of deal,” he said.

Most states have not returned spending to prerecession levels, Mr. Weeden said, but improving economic outlooks are freeing up more funds for higher-education spending. So it is possible that other states will soon look to Washington State’s plan for inspiration, he said, adding that tying tuition to the median family income might be another policy that proves viable elsewhere.

One factor to keep in mind, he said, is that lawmakers in other states might demand that colleges absorb some or all of the costs of a tuition cut, which could be problematic.

ADVERTISEMENT

Also, even if a state provided money to make up for lost tuition revenue from a cut, such a plan may not gain college officials’ support if lawmakers don’t provide money for other higher-education priorities, Mr. Mulick said.

If a tuition cut “crowded out other needed investments in higher education like compensation and enhancing access,” he said, “it would’ve been hard for us to swallow.”

A version of this article appeared in the September 18, 2015, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
SarahBrown2024
About the Author
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is The Chronicle’s news editor. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin