> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

How One University Revised Its Policy on Faculty-Student Relationships

By  Emma Pettit
February 16, 2020

In 2017, Cornell University’s policy for consensual relationships between students and faculty members needed an update. It had been in place since 1996 and had obvious shortcomings, like its lack of distinction between undergraduate and graduate students and its vagueness about when such relationships were outright banned.

Martha E. Pollack, Cornell’s president, charged a committee to draft a policy that was “easy to understand” and “inspires ethical behavior.” The committee, co-chaired by a Ph.D. student and an emeritus professor, got to work.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

In 2017, Cornell University’s policy for consensual relationships between students and faculty members needed an update. It had been in place since 1996 and had obvious shortcomings, like its lack of distinction between undergraduate and graduate students and its vagueness about when such relationships were outright banned.

Martha E. Pollack, Cornell’s president, charged a committee to draft a policy that was “easy to understand” and “inspires ethical behavior.” The committee, co-chaired by a Ph.D. student and an emeritus professor, got to work.

Of most importance was talking to as many stakeholders as possible, said Anna Waymack, the Ph.D. student. Having those conversations made Waymack realize just how far apart people’s concepts of power imbalances and conflicts of interest are. And for Charles F. Van Loan, the emeritus professor and dean of faculty, the mere act of discussing the policy was the most valuable part of the project, because the issues it raised can be tricky to talk about. For instance, there are faculty members in Van Loan’s age range who, 30 or 40 years ago, married their graduate students, he said.

Both Van Loan and Waymack said that having co-chairs from different disciplines and at different vantage points on the academic hierarchy was important to the process. Some people might not be comfortable telling certain things to a graduate student; others might not want to talk to a senior faculty member. “Anna and I were great bookends,” Van Loan says.

Eventually the committee put forth two policy options for discussion. Both prohibited faculty members from pursuing relationships with undergraduates. Neither allowed faculty members who had a current or past romantic relationship with a graduate student or a postdoctoral student to exercise academic or professional authority over that student.

ADVERTISEMENT

The difference? One proposal also banned relationships between faculty members and all graduate and postdoctoral students who are affiliated with the same field or degree program. The other proposal permitted those relationships so long as faculty members disclosed them and created a plan to limit their own authority over the student.

Everyone from students to staff to faculty members discussed the proposals. Richard Miller, a philosophy professor, argued that the cost of banning intradepartmental relationships was too high, the student newspaper reported. “Ithaca is a small city, in which extremely busy, unattached junior faculty find it hard to develop emotional attachment with those who share their intellectual interest broadly defined,” Miller said. Other professors worried that either option would breach the privacy of the people involved.

The committee recommended that the final policy include the ban on relationships in the same field or degree program. Pollack considered all the feedback and endorsed a compromise: Sexual or romantic relationships between faculty members and graduate or professional students are banned whenever the faculty member exercises direct academic authority or “is likely to in the foreseeable future.” It allows for certain intrafield and intradegree-program relationships.

“I believe that these prohibitions adequately protect the interests of students and faculty while minimizing risk to the university and its mission,” Pollack wrote. Cornell’s policy office ironed out the details, and the new rules became final in December 2018.

For other universities that want to embark on something similar, Van Loan says, make sure you get the people who will be most affected by the policy — students — in the room. Otherwise, he says, you will lose credibility.

ADVERTISEMENT


Back to the 2020 Trends Report
A version of this article appeared in the February 21, 2020, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Graduate EducationLaw & Policy
Emma Pettit
Emma Pettit is a senior reporter at The Chronicle who covers all things faculty. She writes mostly about professors and the strange, funny, sometimes harmful and sometimes hopeful ways they work and live. Follow her on Twitter at @EmmaJanePettit, or email her at emma.pettit@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin