Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
News

How Real-World Learning Could Help People Compete With Machines

By Scott Carlson November 20, 2017
Joseph E. Aoun
Joseph E. AounAdam Glanzman, Northeastern U

When machines come for our jobs, we will need skills in communication, creativity, collaboration, and complex thinking to compete, says Joseph E. Aoun, president of Northeastern University. It will take a completely different kind of education system, he says — not the current one, created at the height of the farm and factory economies — to prepare people for the future work force.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Joseph E. Aoun
Joseph E. AounAdam Glanzman, Northeastern U

When machines come for our jobs, we will need skills in communication, creativity, collaboration, and complex thinking to compete, says Joseph E. Aoun, president of Northeastern University. It will take a completely different kind of education system, he says — not the current one, created at the height of the farm and factory economies — to prepare people for the future work force.

Consider the numbers: Economists say the United States has lost about five million manufacturing jobs since 2000, twice the losses of the 1980s and ’90s, as offshoring and machines have taken over routine labor. Meanwhile the economy has added tens of millions of service jobs, which require higher levels of education. But white-collar jobs are hardly safe, as artificial intelligence could oust workers from fields as diverse as radiology, accounting, and insurance. We face a churning, unstable labor market, in which everyone is vulnerable to replacement by a robot.

Mr. Aoun, a theoretical linguist by training, is a vocal advocate for Northeastern’s co-op model of education, with students working in real-world jobs related to their studies. Students need training in “humanics": a mixture of data science, technology, the liberal arts, and empathy, he writes in his new book, Robot-Proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (MIT), which came out about a year after he write a similarly titled article for The Chronicle. Colleges should take a broader lens on disciplines, he says, helping students connect disparate issues. He believes that those lessons come best outside the cloister of the classroom, in messy yet engaging real-world environments.

•

Is the future about unexpected combinations?

Yes. “Humanics” is the integration of three literacies not only through curricula and combined majors but also through experiential learning. You can study creativity and entrepreneurship, but you have to practice them, which allows you to test yourself, to see where you are good, where you are not, where your passion is. It allows you to understand how to work with others. It allows you to practice systems thinking.

What are the consequences for higher education, which is dominated by disciplines?

What worked for us over the last 200 years is not going to work for us over the next 50 years. The rewards and grants are going to multidisciplinary, translational research that is impacting society. That, by definition, requires multiple disciplines. At the same time, students are asking for combined majors, for majors in different fields.

Robot Proof

Whenever you have change, there are people who embrace change, people who resist it, and the large majority who wait and see. In higher education, we want to change the world, but we are somewhat reluctant when it comes to changing ourselves. Empower people who want to experiment and innovate. They become the ambassadors. They become the people who will carry the institution. If you believe in academic freedom, you have to allow this culture of experimentation, to make it part of what we do on a daily basis. One mistake would be to prevent it, but another mistake would be to ask everybody to do it.

ADVERTISEMENT

How is the new environment pushing us back to an old model? Instead of memorization and classroom instruction, will we see more apprenticeships, open conversations under a tree, learning through play — forms that predate our modern idea of education?

In higher education, we introduce a dichotomy between learning to live and learning to earn a living. There is nothing sacred about the old, and there is nothing sacred about the new. What is sacred is the learner. Are we making learners robot-proof throughout their lives?

In many ways, the experiential component forces you to do what is needed. You hear about robotics competitions, and that’s advanced manufacturing. You don’t put up barriers, and you are not driven by a curriculum divorced from reality. You are discovering, you are shaping, and you’re making an impact. It’s not only the classroom instruction but the world instruction. The world is going to lead you on a journey where you have to integrate various components.

You say that machines and creative destruction will force people to become lifelong learners. Isn’t it exhausting for people to consider a future of having to constantly retool and reinvent themselves?

ADVERTISEMENT

Yes, but it’s also exhilarating, because you have an opportunity to redefine yourself constantly. That’s the new reality. When I talk to our students, not only are they ready for that, but they embrace it, because they grew up in an environment where things started changing constantly.

If you look at your job as a 9-to-5 job, it means that you are not passionate. You are not excited about your job, but you are doing it because you have to. Lifelong learning provides the opportunities to discover new passions and also to live a meaningful life — not only at work, but to be a productive citizen.

Some people who have creative-class jobs will always be interested in their work, but other people just work to survive.

Those jobs are subject to automation. Everything that can be turned into a process is going to disappear. The opportunity for the human species is to focus on our human attributes and cultivate them. If we don’t do that, then we become obsolete.

ADVERTISEMENT

Young people may be entrepreneurial and excited about a future of reinventing themselves, but reports also indicate that they’re anxious — and afraid of failure. You say failure is essential.

When I talk to people in other countries, I mention that failure is a learning process. They tell me that in their educational system and in their culture, failure is not something that has been accepted. On a global scale, we accept failure. We have the phrase “Fail, fail fast, and start again.” But do we accept failure in schools? The answer is no.

This is why the introduction of an experiential component is important, because not everything you’re going to start on an experiential level is going to work. We say here at Northeastern that there is no failed co-op. Why? Because if a co-op is not what you wanted, if it shows you that you don’t like a field, that’s success, too. That’s meaningful. Failure is a relative term.

Realistically, are you optimistic or pessimistic about the future?

ADVERTISEMENT

I see countries that are focusing a lot on education and lifelong learning. The U.K. is now discussing the possibility of asking each company to set aside a percentage of its margin to educate people, to upskill them or reskill them. When you look at China, the investments in education and in research are at an all-time high, and increasing.

In the United States, we have a system that is extremely diverse, which I value tremendously, because we have private institutions, public institutions, small colleges, community colleges. That allows us to innovate and experiment. In other countries, the minister of education determines what the curriculum is, or even what the research priorities are.

We should embrace experiential education, because it is a humbling experience. It leads you to be in tune with the reality, the changes, and the opportunities that exist. We run the risk of becoming like the railway industry, which said, We are focusing on railway transportation — and they missed the airline revolution.

In some ways, you are seeing that happening. You have companies starting universities. That’s not their core business. Why are they doing that? Because we are not meeting their needs. The opportunity for higher education is to embrace lifelong learning because the companies, when we talk to them, say, Look, this is not our core endeavor, but no one is meeting our needs.

ADVERTISEMENT

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Scott Carlson is a senior writer who covers the cost and value of college. Email him at scott.carlson@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the November 24, 2017, issue.
Read other items in The Future of Work.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Scott Carlson
About the Author
Scott Carlson
Scott Carlson is a senior writer who explores where higher education is headed. He is a co-author of Hacking College: Why the Major Doesn’t Matter — and What Really Does (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025). Follow him on LinkedIn, or write him at scott.carlson@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Robot-Proof: How Colleges Can Keep People Relevant in the Workplace
A New Liberal Art
In Learning, the Lasting Value of Place
When Vocational Education Spurs Students to Strive for College
Want a College Experience That Matters? Get to Work.

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin