Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Academic Freedom

How Should Colleges Respond to Politics in Letters of Recommendation?

By Steven Johnson October 10, 2018
After two faculty members at the U. of Michigan at Ann Arbor declined to write letters of recommendation for political reasons, and one of them was disciplined, it turned out that professors are often unaware of campus policies on the letters — if such policies even exist.
After two faculty members at the U. of Michigan at Ann Arbor declined to write letters of recommendation for political reasons, and one of them was disciplined, it turned out that professors are often unaware of campus policies on the letters — if such policies even exist.U. of Michigan

When two faculty members at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor declined recently to write letters of recommendation for students seeking to study in Israel, the ensuing controversy exposed an ethical tangle involving academic freedom, free speech, students’ rights, and the place of politics in academe.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

After two faculty members at the U. of Michigan at Ann Arbor declined to write letters of recommendation for political reasons, and one of them was disciplined, it turned out that professors are often unaware of campus policies on the letters — if such policies even exist.
After two faculty members at the U. of Michigan at Ann Arbor declined to write letters of recommendation for political reasons, and one of them was disciplined, it turned out that professors are often unaware of campus policies on the letters — if such policies even exist.U. of Michigan

When two faculty members at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor declined recently to write letters of recommendation for students seeking to study in Israel, the ensuing controversy exposed an ethical tangle involving academic freedom, free speech, students’ rights, and the place of politics in academe.

Michigan has penalized John Cheney-Lippold, the first faculty member, withholding a merit raise and sabbaticals for two years. And on Wednesday the university announced a new faculty panel to “examine the intersection between political thought/ideology and faculty members’ responsibilities to students.”

Michigan’s response has reverberated elsewhere. When Katy E. Pearce, an associate professor of communication at the University of Washington, learned the news on Wednesday morning, she thought, “Gosh, I guess I’d better look into if my own university has any policies about this, because I have no idea.”

Pearce routinely declines to write letters of recommendation for students seeking work at another institution some professors disagree with: Teach for America, the organization that sends off new college graduates to teach in underserved urban and rural schools. “When students approach me about Teach for America for letters of recommendation,” which happens about once a year, she said, “if I can talk to them face to face, I will.” But sometimes she’ll send an email explaining her reasons for opposing the organization, with links to an article or two explaining the criticism.

Professors decline to write letters of recommendation for all sorts of mundane reasons: lack of time, unfamiliarity with the student, or the student’s poor performance. The recent cases raise thornier questions: How should professors handle recommendations for students who want to pursue studies or causes the instructors disagree with, and how should colleges respond?

Professors who spoke with The Chronicle aren’t aware of guidance on the matter from their institution. And they cited similar reasoning: The university doesn’t intervene in the content of syllabi, or whom a professor may allow to visit the classroom to speak. Why should it do so for a professor’s decisions on letters of recommendation?

‘A Delicate Process’

“It’s a delicate process, and one that has to be handled with utmost professional and personal care,” said Siva Vaidhyanathan, a professor of media studies at the University of Virginia. “The thing is, nobody tells us this when we start the tenure track.” Recommendations were once a function of the “good-old-boy days,” he said, but now are “a lot more complex.”

In a Facebook post, Vaidhyanathan noted that while he was “rather vehemently” opposed to the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, the Palestinian-rights campaign that led the two Michigan instructors to decline to provide recommendations, Michigan’s punishment of Cheney-Lippold was “unwarranted.”

Professors have a “moral obligation to represent our students in good faith” to the groups students want to join, Vaidhyanathan said. When they can’t do so for organizations they oppose for moral or political reasons, they should explain that to the student, in private. That’s his practice for students seeking to join Teach for America, which some have long criticized for undermining high-need schools by staffing them with inexperienced teachers who rarely stay long. He said he’d never encountered controversy for doing so.

We have a sacred trust with our students to treat them well in these matters.

“I don’t want to stand in the way of the student, but I also feel like I am not the best representative of the student’s interest in that transaction,” Vaidhyanathan said. “We have a sacred trust with our students to treat them well in these matters.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Vaidhyanathan isn’t aware of his university’s policy on the subject, if one exists. “This is a conversation we should have been having years ago,” he said. Professors are “left on our own.”

Faculty members can’t “opt out entirely” of their obligation to write recommendations, wrote Matthew S. Hedstrom, an associate professor of religious studies at UVa, on Vaidhyanathan’s post, but “no professor should be punished for refusing a letter on principle.” He also saw Michigan’s response as unlike any other he’d seen. “That’s part of what’s so startling about” the news of Cheney-Lippold’s punishment, he said in an interview with The Chronicle. UVa and its Faculty Senate’s chair did not respond to requests for comment.

At Michigan, meanwhile, faculty members are divided on the university’s response. “We have a responsibility to support the academic aspirations and goals of our students, regardless of our own personal political or social beliefs,” wrote Paula Lantz, a professor and associate dean at Michigan’s school of public policy, in a letter on Wednesday afternoon to the school’s graduate-student instructors, supporting the university’s sanctions. “How to respond to student requests for letters of recommendation can be challenging,” she added, urging instructors with questions to consult her. Lantz did not respond to a request for comment.

Another Michigan professor, Clifford Lampe, wrote on Facebook that he would start declining all requests for letters of recommendation. Lampe, of the School of Information, declined to comment when reached by The Chronicle.

ADVERTISEMENT

Michigan directed The Chronicle to its Wednesday announcement and did not respond to a request to share its existing policies on the issue. A relevant policy appears to be Michigan’s professional-standards guide for faculty members. “The university will not tolerate conduct which hinders other members of the community in the exercise of their professional responsibilities and academic freedoms,” it reads, promising that Michigan will intervene when behaviors “interfere with, or adversely affect, a community member’s ability to learn or fulfill the individual’s professional responsibilities.”

Correction (11:05 a.m., 10/11/2018): Katy E. Pearce is an associate professor of communication at the University of Washington, not an assistant professor. The text has been updated accordingly.

Follow Steven Johnson on Twitter at @stetyjohn, or email him at steve.johnson@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the October 19, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Steven Johnson
Steven Johnson is an Indiana-born journalist who’s reported stories about business, culture, and education for The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Washington Post, and The Atlantic.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

U. of Michigan Disciplines Professor Who Refused to Recommend a Student Heading to Israel
Academics Who Back Boycott of Israel Practice Activism With Small, Weighty Gestures
U. of Michigan Professor Refuses to Recommend Student Whose Destination Is Israel

More News

Joan Wong for The Chronicle
Productivity Measures
A 4/4 Teaching Load Becomes Law at Most of Wisconsin’s Public Universities
Illustration showing a letter from the South Carolina Secretary of State over a photo of the Bob Jones University campus.
Missing Files
Apparent Paperwork Error Threatens Bob Jones U.'s Legal Standing in South Carolina
Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin