> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

How Sources of Support Divide Scientists

By  Peter Monaghan
November 19, 2017
David R. Johnson
U. of Nevada at Reno
David R. Johnson

The growing phenomenon of tailoring academic science to commercial outcomes is well documented, but little has been written about how that trend affects the way scientists view their work.

In A Fractured Profession: Commercialism and Conflict in Academic Science (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017), David R. Johnson, an assistant professor of higher-education leadership at the University of Nevada at Reno, seeks to remedy that. He explores the experiences and attitudes of “commercialists,” who seek industry funding, obtain patents, and create technology start-ups intended to advance financially rewarding societal goals, and of “traditionalists,” who concentrate on “pure science” that explains how the world works.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

David R. Johnson
U. of Nevada at Reno
David R. Johnson

The growing phenomenon of tailoring academic science to commercial outcomes is well documented, but little has been written about how that trend affects the way scientists view their work.

In A Fractured Profession: Commercialism and Conflict in Academic Science (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017), David R. Johnson, an assistant professor of higher-education leadership at the University of Nevada at Reno, seeks to remedy that. He explores the experiences and attitudes of “commercialists,” who seek industry funding, obtain patents, and create technology start-ups intended to advance financially rewarding societal goals, and of “traditionalists,” who concentrate on “pure science” that explains how the world works.

Commercialism does hold “a risk of suffocating curiosity-driven research that doesn’t have an obvious application in sight,” Mr. Johnson said in an interview. Through his book, he hopes to encourage discussion of how to balance research priorities during a period of reduced federal support for science and what he calls an “unprecedented interface between the academy and industry.” He asks, in effect, “Are universities getting carried away in their emphasis on commercialization?”

During the interviews he conducted with scores of research-university scientists, he said, he was not surprised to hear concerns about such issues as how commercial success may lead to unequal salaries and working conditions for professors, or may even act as a sort of peer review that generates pressure on researchers to seek commercial rather than more-traditional scientific success.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some traditionalists, he found, spoke of feeling as if they were “being pushed out of science because they don’t want to tie their research, or don’t see a way to tie it, to some sort of societal outcome.” Also disheartening for such scholars, he says, is that they know that many societally and commercially profitable discoveries emerge, unforeseeably, from basic research.

Among findings that surprised him, Mr. Johnson said, was that few universities make a significant amount of money from commercial science, even if many administrators believe or hope that it can solve research-funding woes. He cited data indicating that, between 1996 and 2008, the 10 universities with the highest licensing income earned only 0.3 percent to 4.3 percent on their total research expenditures.

Also surprising, he said, was to find that while making money does motivate commercialists, it does so no more than a quest for status. “If you’re in a department of chemistry at one of the top universities in the country,” he said, “one of the things you can do to stand out, if everybody has funding from the National Science Foundation or the National Institutes of Health, and everybody is published in Nature or Science, is through major honors.”

“But another,” he said, “is being able to say that you developed a product that has affected thousands or hundreds of thousands of individuals.”

A version of this article appeared in the November 24, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
The Workplace
Peter Monaghan
Peter Monaghan is a correspondent for The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin